Riley seems to me to be the best NFL fit. He's not into the 'family' stuff like Matt Campbell, who I doubt would work well with the NFL's mindset. He's just too gung-ho for that. Reminds me of Lou Holtz in that way.
Riley, on the other hand, is much more the technician than the father figure. And Riley has had far more success than Campbell, if this thread is about in some way comparing the two for that platform.
I agree with you as long as the coach enjoys dealing with recruiting, boosters, academics, 18-year olds, the NCAA, CFP, and all that goes with the college game. Some do not. Guys like Saban, Ferentz, and I believe Matt Campbell clearly do.College HC jobs are far better. You win 8,9,10 games a year... go to bowls... Get paid great... and everyone loves you.
The NFL is "what have you done for me lately"... ask Doug Pederson. He wins a Superbowl and 3 years later he's unemployed.
I would go NFL personally. Recruiting can be a grind.You also have to deal with egos and a salary cap in the NFL. Both have their downsides, but if I was established in college and making tons of money, I personally would stay in college. The pay difference is not as big as it used to be and the pressure/turnover in the NFL is crazy.
I believe you are overestimating how much control coaches have in the draft. They have input but they don't have control.And egos are all about selection. Coaches control that in the draft just as they do in college when recruiting. It's something I admire about Saban. He seems to have fine youngsters in his program.
Exactly, unless they're the GM.I believe you are overestimating how much control coaches have in the draft. They have input but they don't have control.
And egos are all about selection. Coaches control that in the draft just as they do in college when recruiting. It's something I admire about Saban. He seems to have fine youngsters in his program.