I was able to watch the Creighton-Nebr. game last night and it was shocking. Nebr. has a good looking fr. G in Anderson , Maric and Richardson and very little else. Creighton has everybody back but one and Funk back for a fifth year, and they go about 10 deep. They shot about 35%, never took the ball inside, were outrebounded badly in the second half by a team with 1 guy over 6'5". Nebr. shot about 65% despite a good defense by Cr. and made several desperation 3's as the shot clock expired. I thoght Creighton got jobbed by the refs several times, and I'm pretty sure nobody on this board cares one way or another. I just thought it was worth mentioning, because of the Altman- connection.
Creighton at Lincoln
- Thread starter Oldgeezer
- Start date
I wish they could both lose. :biggrin9gp:
I don't ever like to see a nearby mid-major have success when we're struggling. And I certainly don't want Nebraska to turn nothing into something.
A Husker grad told me at work recently that they had a top-10 class coming in next year. I haven't seen anything to that effect online...anybody else hear that? I'm thinking he misheard something.
I don't ever like to see a nearby mid-major have success when we're struggling. And I certainly don't want Nebraska to turn nothing into something.
A Husker grad told me at work recently that they had a top-10 class coming in next year. I haven't seen anything to that effect online...anybody else hear that? I'm thinking he misheard something.
Nebkraska has 7 recruits for 07. Four of them are JC's. Four three stars and three two star's. Not a top ten class by talent. Some of the recruiting site's define a top class by total star's, and having seven players they can add up even if they are average player's.
