Bracketology...women jump to a 9 after win

Discussion in 'Women's Basketball' started by acoustimac, Mar 9, 2020.

  1. acoustimac

    acoustimac Well-Known Member

    Jan 8, 2009
    3,806
    672
    113
    Male
    Professor of Education
    Lamoni, IA
    Ratings:
    +1,694 / 73 / -0
    B1D900C0-CB64-4ED4-B464-9EE6A96F781A.jpeg
     
    • Like Like x 3
  2. UNIclonefan

    UNIclonefan Member

    May 1, 2018
    86
    23
    8
    Male
    Ratings:
    +161 / 14 / -3
    That's awesome! Those girls have worked hard to be where they're at and deserve nothing but the best. Btw, how amazing is it to upset Kim Mulkey? She embodies the Baylor way by which I mean she's garbage.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. BenEClone

    BenEClone Well-Known Member

    Mar 21, 2006
    2,457
    83
    48
    Lincoln, Ne
    Ratings:
    +152 / 8 / -0
    Official RPI jumped to 39, solid 8-10 range and a good chance to get a W in the dance. BU dropped to 5, might lose a one seed but Charlie still has them as a one headed toward a regional semi with outclassed Stanford.
     
  4. twojman

    twojman Well-Known Member

    Jun 1, 2006
    5,866
    347
    83
    Male
    Being awesome
    Clive
    Ratings:
    +1,218 / 112 / -7
    Yesterday was an awesome win for ISU, I loved it. I was clapping pretty loud in our living room!

    I was trying to read Mulkey's lips with the foul. I thought she basically said you can't call that foul at that point in the game. IMO, if it is a foul 3 minutes into the game, it is a foul at the end of the game. Her meltdown made me happy.

    As far as seeding I really hope they can get to a 7. We shall see, would be pretty tough.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Ms3r4ISU

    Ms3r4ISU Well-Known Member

    May 7, 2008
    5,411
    597
    113
    Communication specialist
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +1,769 / 16 / -0
    All I kept saying was, that already happened here on this court. Yes you can call a foul in that situation at that time.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. GT25Ump

    GT25Ump Active Member

    Oct 24, 2009
    576
    106
    43
    Male
    Publication Editor
    Sioux City, Iowa
    Ratings:
    +495 / 78 / -10
  7. Buster28

    Buster28 Well-Known Member

    Dec 3, 2011
    2,587
    615
    113
    Male
    Ames
    Ratings:
    +1,247 / 12 / -0
    She has Iowa State listed as the Big 12's "automatic qualifier" at the bottom of the article, which is unlikely, since they'd have to beat Baylor a second time in a week (and I don't see Baylor dropping two games in one week to the same team). Maybe that's why she has ISU as a 5? The numbers just don't add up for that good of a seed as of today. Maybe if ISU actually was the AQ come Sunday afternoon.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. mred

    mred Well-Known Member

    Oct 19, 2006
    6,208
    805
    113
    SE WI
    Ratings:
    +1,362 / 15 / -0
    There's no way an AQ would get us a 5. I think we're a 7 max (and probably a 9 worst case, although I'd rather be a 10 than a 9).
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. BoxsterCy

    BoxsterCy Well-Known Member
    SuperFanatic

    Sep 14, 2009
    30,369
    8,889
    113
    Living the Dream
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +22,355 / 437 / -1
  10. acoustimac

    acoustimac Well-Known Member

    Jan 8, 2009
    3,806
    672
    113
    Male
    Professor of Education
    Lamoni, IA
    Ratings:
    +1,694 / 73 / -0
    To get a five seed we would have to destroy everyone in the tournament. That would include beating Baylor by 20 or 30 points. That is about as likely as the conference reopening the stadiums to fans.
     

Share This Page