My opinion, any discussion of raiding the PAC needs to start with Colorado.
I'd love to have Colorado back, but don't know how many bridges they burned from being the first ones to leave back in 2010.
My opinion, any discussion of raiding the PAC needs to start with Colorado.
It would be interesting to know if they regret the move now.My opinion, any discussion of raiding the PAC needs to start with Colorado.
No thanks to Colorado. I'm not sure that does much for the conference.
Colorado always would have rather been in the Pac 12 than the Big 12. When the offer was made, and even after the other 5 schools pulled out. The Buffs still went ahead with the switch. Let them live with their decision, and do not offer UC.
There is ZERO reason to add anyone. Expansion for expansion sake is a loser.
Az schools bring squat to B12 brand except half full football stadiums with mediocre teams at best.
Idiots abound.
There is ZERO reason to add anyone. Expansion for expansion sake is a loser.
Az schools bring squat to B12 brand except half full football stadiums with mediocre teams at best.
Idiots abound.
If OU and Texas are happy then there is no sense expanding, but if they want division play and we could get a couple of the Pac 12 schools, then the conference would be silly not to do it.
As always, it comes down to what OU and Texas want to stay in the conference. I am NOT talking about taking Memphis, Houston or any G5 school, but P5 schools like Arizona and Arizona St, see if UCLA or another school or two is interested. Take anywhere from 2 to 4 and stop there.
Hell the Arizona schools, Utah and say UCLA would look really nice in the conference.
If OU and Texas are happy then there is no sense expanding, but if they want division play and we could get a couple of the Pac 12 schools, then the conference would be silly not to do it.
As always, it comes down to what OU and Texas want to stay in the conference. I am NOT talking about taking Memphis, Houston or any G5 school, but P5 schools like Arizona and Arizona St, see if UCLA or another school or two is interested. Take anywhere from 2 to 4 and stop there.
Hell the Arizona schools, Utah and say UCLA would look really nice in the conference.
Just wondering but didn't we eliminate west coast teams as a possibility when we let in WVU? We can't expect them to travel so far to play other conference teams.
No thanks to Colorado. I'm not sure that does much for the conference.
10 is best.
I don't remember any agreement with WV, if they do not like it, then they can vote NO, and then leave the conference if it should happen.
I have said for a couple of years, if the Big 12 goes down in flames, there is not a school in a worse position that WV. If the ACC was going to invite them, they would be playing there now. The did not have the academics for the Big 10, they bring little or nothing to the SEC beside geography. They could be screwed and end up in the AAC, just another G5 school.
It would be interesting to know if they regret the move now.
You think WV's position is worse than Baylor's?