Agreed, particularly in basketball - it doesn't do either school any good for the other one to be horrid.
Plus, I kinda like Lickliter to this point. His game's not flashy, but I don't think that's such a bad thing. And he has the stones to discipline his players and keep things in line.
Hopefully they get better. (but not at our expense :wink
There is a difference between being patient and with slowing the game down, making it ugly, and keeping it close. Lick's teams, at Iowa, have tried to make it ugly, hold the ball, shorten the game. Thats fine, if thats his game plan, but I hope it doesn't continue. There is a difference between a defensive struggle and playing keep away to keep it close. Iowa was in a lot of games, people still didn't show up to Carver.
I am all for tough, physical, defensive battles. You find out a lot about the coaches and the players in those games. There were times I would watch Iowa games last year and they would have opportunities to score early in the shot clock and they would pass them up, regularly, and then settle for something contested as the shot clock wound down.
I guess, my thought is, in order to attract talent to a BCS conference school...no matter the tradition...the system must be fun to play in. The kids he has currently on the roster are not kids who will give you a chance to make a run in the Big 10 and get yourself to the post-season, atleast what I have seen. Gatens is a very good player, but he doesn't have a complementing scorer to go with him.
My opinion is of a philosophy difference, in recruiting and system. Some of these kids are very good role players, but you need the horses to go with them. Cougill and May are both going to get baptized in the fire before they are ready. Some of the pieces are there, but I'm not convinced yet that he is getting the other pieces or just getting the same pieces.