You are correct a hundred times over.I have to respectfully disagree. I feel its time for us to move beyond making decisions based off how that makes us compare to Iowa (in anything).
Any decision in this situations will affect a very young man, a new coach and his legacy at ISU, a team, a university, and its supporters and fans. These things are way more important to me than how it will make us look compared to the Hawks. No matter how much I appreciate the banter and the rivalry, I think the Hawkeye fans are correct about us being the step child of the state until we grow beyond using Iowa University as our benchmark.
I don't care what people here "claim" is important. If we win and there is subversive activities in the program, no one will say anything because we're winning. The instant we lose a game/match/meet, though, everyone will complain. What Long did as far as has been disclosed is not grounds for being dismissed from the team. Missing the first meet or two? Yea. Losing the scholly? Nope.
IMO, the only people that are saying that he should "get lost" are those that feel that taking a different stance than Iowa FB (ONE SPORT) somehow makes us better than them, which it doesn't.