Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'In-State Rivals' started by YeahBuddy, Jan 2, 2018.
You'd still rather have Nate instead of Brock?
He'll be back after his "new job training" in the big city making lots of money.
Yes...but I’m faithful to a fault.
You agree with my current all Iowa team?
Hey Kirk, what’s up?
Its okay to admit Purdy is better than Stanley. I don't really know how you could think otherwise look at the numbers.
The offense is bad. If Duncan wasn’t making his kicks unlike us, Iowa would be hurting real bad.
A little cyclone heavy but reasonable...
That wasn’t the question I responded to...
I think Iowa is undefeated if they had Purdy. Not trolling either
Possibly. Is Brian Ferentz still calling the plays though?
Shut up. My Civic has turbo.
Yeah but Purdy would be able to improvise
fixed it for you
Are we ignoring the fact that Kirk would immediately pull any quarterback that tried to improvise? Or the fact that he’d never start a younger, more talented quarterback over a senior? Are those things being ignored in this hypothetical?
He let Banks do it that one year