Judge OK's $2.8B settlement, paving way for colleges to pay athletes

cyclone87

Well-Known Member
Apr 6, 2011
3,318
1,540
113
Ames, IA
Going to need some type of legislation now to prevent future lawsuits (mostly regarding antitrust).
 

Sparkplug

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 9, 2008
3,019
1,956
113
Central Iowa
All athletes from 2016 to present will get paid. Did I read this right?

Will they pay into IPERS?
 
Last edited:

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,770
13,410
113
How will this eventually affect ISU? So athletes will be paid by the university - employees. Iowa State and much of the P3 and 4 conference members still do not have near the money as anyone in the P2, and the gap compounds and widens every year.

How will this change the current inequity? Will there ever be a type of profit sharing and or payroll caps like in the NFL?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hoosman

ISUinOR

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2007
341
307
63
Portland, OR
I would like to see the formula they use to determine each athlete's VALUE. If all athletes are getting paid, I wonder what walk-ons get simply for being part of the team. Some are more valuable and do more than scholarship athletes.
 

Clonedogg

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2009
2,511
1,860
113
CR, IA
biblehub.com

cyclone1209

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2010
3,856
2,524
113
Denver

I don’t love a baseball guy being tapped for this. Baseball has a ton of issues right now
 

exCYtable

Well-Known Member
Apr 15, 2010
4,760
8,438
113
How does this keep a billionaire from still paying a bunch of superstars to come play basketball or football for his/her favorite team through true Name/Image/Likeness money?
 

SCNCY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 11, 2009
10,688
8,502
113
37
La Fox, IL
How does this keep a billionaire from still paying a bunch of superstars to come play basketball or football for his/her favorite team through true Name/Image/Likeness money?

Supposedly Deloitte will monitor the value of NIL deals for each athlete. So one school wouldn’t be able to out bid for a particular athlete as their value will be the same regardless where they play. Doesn’t mean that a bunch of superstars couldn’t all go to the same school; but the playing field should be a little more level as players won’t be incentivized to chase dollars.

Personally, I have little faith in Deloitte being able to manage and determine an athletes NIL value that doesn’t correlate to a teams historical success, especially at the blue blood level. I think we’re going to see the same correlation of an ADs revenue/budget to success as we do in NIL value.
 

Clark

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2009
18,434
4,696
113
Altoona
Supposedly Deloitte will monitor the value of NIL deals for each athlete. So one school wouldn’t be able to out bid for a particular athlete as their value will be the same regardless where they play. Doesn’t mean that a bunch of superstars couldn’t all go to the same school; but the playing field should be a little more level as players won’t be incentivized to chase dollars.

Personally, I have little faith in Deloitte being able to manage and determine an athletes NIL value that doesn’t correlate to a teams historical success, especially at the blue blood level. I think we’re going to see the same correlation of an ADs revenue/budget to success as we do in NIL value.

That's not the problem, pretty sure they're plenty capable of doing the job. The issue is someone is going to sue over this and I don't see how that holds up.
 

hoosman

Well-Known Member
Sep 4, 2006
2,126
1,618
113
Davenport
At this point , I would be ok if robots were developed to take over playing the game. Then the targeting, hands to face, taunting, roughing the passer, injury delays, substituting can all be eliminated.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: t-noah and Cloneon

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,770
13,410
113
I don’t love a baseball guy being tapped for this. Baseball has a ton of issues right now
Kinda like the fox being in charge of the chicken coop?

"Hmm, I'll have the Rhode Island Red for supper tonight, save the Leghorn for tomorrow..."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kinch

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,770
13,410
113
At this point , I would be ok if robots were developed to take over playing the game. Then the targeting, hands to face, taunting, roughing the passer, injury delays, substituting can all be eliminated.
Injuries would be a thing of the past. Simply insert next clone-robot. LOL
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,770
13,410
113

So, in other words, no equity. Schools will have to pay athletes (past and present) at least 20.5 M/year, and NIL continues, probably unabated. The "enforcement arm" for the allocation of monies to the players will likely be 'all lime and salt and no tequila'.

The rich will continue to pay their way to the top. Congress passing antitrust exemptions should help, but I don't see how the Big 12 or ISU can thrive in this environment. The only significant rules will benefit the haves, the schools who have most of the money.

What a country. The only way ISU survives is if the Iowa Board of Regents supplements our athletic department and school. Iowa will want equal time /pay from the State, but do not need as much, if any, to survive, under the current media deals. That will not go over well.

How do others see this in one to two years? Does ISU continue with big time college athletics, or is that going to be a thing of the past?
 
Last edited:
  • Sad
Reactions: drmwevr08

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron