Viewing Habits Suggests Soccer's Rise. Baseball's Decline.

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
69,102
69,122
113
DSM
Yeah I think that is true in most women's sports, they are usually as technical as the men. In soccer it really shines through because of all the space they have, so the gifted technical players really stand out. And what they do doesn't happen faster than your eye can see. It really helps you learn the nuances of the game. At least in my opinion. I learn a lot more for female golfers for that reason too. They are way better technically than I would ever be, but I can at least see what they are doing and try to emulate it without having to slow it down.

1000000000000%
 
  • Like
Reactions: CychiatricWard

somecyguy

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2006
3,202
3,553
113
Baseball needs to limit the number of pitchers you can carry on the roster. Fewer pitchers fewer pitching changes thus faster games. Also it is really fun to watch a position player pitch and with fewer pitchers that would happen more often.

The extreme specialization of pitching is ridiculous. I know it's all data driven, but holy hell, it still annoys me when a starting pitcher considers 5 innings a quality start. Pitchers from 20 years would call that getting warmed up.
 

SoapyCy

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2012
20,023
9,760
113
grundy center
.

The most die-hard Crew ultras are all like that type. They go and drink as a group, walk to the stadium as a group, throw smoke and bang drums during the game together. Walk out of the stadium as a group, then go drink more as a group.

Honestly I wish I had a group of friends where we did that. That's sounds awesome.
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
61,864
56,502
113
Not exactly sure.
Yeah I think that is true in most women's sports, they are usually as technical as the men. In soccer it really shines through because of all the space they have, so the gifted technical players really stand out. And what they do doesn't happen faster than your eye can see. It really helps you learn the nuances of the game. At least in my opinion. I learn a lot more for female golfers for that reason too. They are way better technically than I would ever be, but I can at least see what they are doing and try to emulate it without having to slow it down.
I don't get much golf knowledge watch paige though.

1614644596424.png
 

jctisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2017
7,634
9,460
113
36
Kids should not start playing baseball before the age of 7. It's too boring for them otherwise. Pushing them to try it at 4-5 yrs old is destroying interest.

Also...tennis is a very underrated sport to watch. Super entertaining IMO.
I am a huge tennis fan. Picked up playing about 14 years ago and the game is so different then it used to be. It’s physical and mental to a high level. The trick with it is not get frustrated and be able to get past the basics of it. Once I started playing at a good to fairly above average level it easily became my favorite activity. You get an insane workout in if you reach 3.5 to 4.0 level. Anything above that and you will shed weight.
 

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
15,397
28,034
113
I think that really depends on the school you're talking about. Baseball is probably right up there with Hockey as being a rich kid sport.

Before anybody gets all bent out of shape about what I'm going to say keep in mind I have had two kids play USSSA baseball at the same time. We're down to one playing travel/freshman ball and one playing rec league right now.

If you're in a relatively wealthy school district baseball is still huge through high school. When I say relatively wealthy I'm thinking West Des Moines, Urbandale, or Cedar Falls. If you live in one of those areas you've probably got several club baseball programs to choose from who will gladly take your $600-$800 for fees, then you need to buy a $300 bat to keep up with the Joneses and a $200 mitt. That bat if you're lucky will last two years before the kid out grows it or if you spent big money on a composite one the damn thing is probably going to crack during one of those cold April tournaments. Then you get to 13U and need a drop 8 bat then again at 14U you need a drop 5 bat and then when he's a freshman you need a drop 3 bat. Maybe you could save some money buying a cheaper glove but then you're probably buying a new glove every year because of the schedule that $80 glove feels like a wet paper towel at the end of the season. If you're a kid from a lower income household you just can't make that work but you can play rec ball and that's a whole lot more reasonable thing but seeing the difference between the two where I live you've got a whole bunch of kids who are unprepared for high school baseball just because their parents didn't have $1500 laying around to drop into their kids making up for the parents athletic failings.

Now you get into the have nots like a Waterloo East where half the varsity bench is made up of 8th graders. Baseball needs to figure out a way to get those lower income kids involved or in another 50 years it'll be a super niche sport that ends up on some 3rd tier channel where MLB is buying the air time rather than getting paid for their games.

Yeah you pretty much nailed everything what's wrong with youth baseball and really youth sports to a certain degree. It's amazing how blind people are that people are profiting from the privatization side of youth baseball and IMO that's really gross. The other big issue I have with baseball is that people have bought in to the idea that baseball needs to be a year rounds commitment for a frickin 10 year old. It's literally a pony up or get off the bus arrangement. I get that kids learn certain skills at different ages but puberty is a hell of an equalizer.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mramseyISU

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
11,126
16,986
113
When I was a kid my favorite players were guys like Ricky Henderson and Vince Coleman, he’ll even Barry Bonds with the Pirates. Stealing bases is one of the most exciting plays in baseball regardless of the result. No one steals anymore.
This x 1000. Baseball used to fun because different styles could win. Now everybody plays in little league stadiums and it works too well to sit there and take backwards Ks looking for a mistake pitch. As a result you also had great defensive plays. Now you might have a few legit players on a team, but usually a lineup has a few guys that are just B- designated hitters that they throw out in the field.

Baseball has so thoroughly screwed itself. Blackout rules, tiny stadiums that have led to this walk/k/hr approach that is a snooze fest, terrible marketing, and the refusal of baseball until now to start tweaking rules to have less downtime. It seems like baseball is either trying to tank, or at best is just appealing to its old base and trying to make some money as it dies.

As has been said in this thread and the youth sports thread, it’s become a sport of die hards only. But it makes sense. Like golf and hockey, it is so skill dependent, that training, practicing and doing sport-specific activities get results. It isn’t like football where a big or athletic kid can show up in 9th grade and quickly become a good player. If you never play baseball or have rarely played more than rev league, you are so far behind in HS that it’s damn near impossible to catch up. If your kid loves baseball and you are willing to shell out a couple grand a year, your kid is going to be a good baseball player almost for sure.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mramseyISU

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
69,102
69,122
113
DSM
This x 1000. Baseball used to fun because different styles could win. Now everybody plays in little league stadiums and it works too well to sit there and take backwards Ks looking for a mistake pitch. As a result you also had great defensive plays. Now you might have a few legit players on a team, but usually a lineup has a few guys that are just B- designated hitters that they throw out in the field.

Baseball has so thoroughly screwed itself. Blackout rules, tiny stadiums that have led to this walk/k/hr approach that is a snooze fest, terrible marketing, and the refusal of baseball until now to start tweaking rules to have less downtime. It seems like baseball is either trying to tank, or at best is just appealing to its old base and trying to make some money as it dies.

As has been said in this thread and the youth sports thread, it’s become a sport of die hards only. But it makes sense. Like golf and hockey, it is so skill dependent, that training, practicing and doing sport-specific activities get results. It isn’t like football where a big or athletic kid can show up in 9th grade and quickly become a good player. If you never play baseball or have rarely played more than rev league, you are so far behind in HS that it’s damn near impossible to catch up. If your kid loves baseball and you are willing to shell out a couple grand a year, your kid is going to be a good baseball player almost for sure.

That’s an interesting point about the stadium size. Golf courses have lengthened and adapted via other intelligent designs to the longer play of today’s game. Baseball hasn’t done anything to adapt to the juiced balls and players.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
11,126
16,986
113
Yeah you pretty much nailed everything what's wrong with youth baseball and really youth sports to a certain degree. It's amazing how blind people are that people are profiting from the privatization side of youth baseball and IMO that's really gross. The other big issue I have with baseball is that people have bought in to the idea that baseball needs to be a year rounds commitment for a frickin 10 year old. It's literally a pony up or get off the bus arrangement. I get that kids learn certain skills at different ages but puberty is a hell of an equalizer.
Yes the extent that some of the USSSA teams go is idiotic. It was great when my sons team with volunteer dad coaches, 4-5 local tournaments under their belt, and a bunch of kids that play multiple sports beat the pants off the local baseball big $ program that plays tons of games.
 

clonehome

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2006
1,565
2,899
113
Baseball has been trending south for the last 2o years but what parents have done to youth baseball has really sped up the slide. We have taken the fun out of baseball and trained are kids that you are either really good or you can't play. So many kids are getting pushed out of baseball before their bodies even have a chance to to grow/mold to the game. It's actually really sad.
Man, you nailed it. I first coached my daughter for 4 years (age 7-10) in a competitive rec softball league and was told early on by the older coaches that tournament ball was cannibalizing rec softball leagues. 2 years later softball was done at our complex, around 2012. The young girls had a choice after that of either diving full tilt into a tourney team or not playing. Many opted not to play and others had a miserable experience and quit after a year.

The same this is now happening for our sons in baseball. If Little League didn’t offer the aspiration of making it to Williamsport at age 12 it wouldn’t exist. It’s all USSSA tourney ball now, which has the expectation of near year round training and games on lots of weekends. It’s great for families that are really into it but it’s killing participation. The rec players were baseballs future fans.
 

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
11,126
16,986
113
That’s an interesting point about the stadium size. Golf courses have lengthened and adapted via other intelligent designs to the longer play of today’s game. Baseball hasn’t done anything to adapt to the juiced balls and players.
It was worse than not adapting. They went all in on the home run when having a lineup of multiple power guys was a cool novelty.

I know I’m in the minority, but it’s sort of like football and how the rules are such that different styles can’t win. You have to have an elite QB or you really have no chance. I hate that throwing up a ball into coverage while a WR initiates contact is a really good strategy.
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
45,770
35,133
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
It's phenomenal. Have you been to games there yet? I've been to 6 in the supporters section, always right behind goal. Never leave with a voice.
We have been to at least 4. The first we were in the SE corner right down by the pitch. That was the game in Allianz's inaugural season where the Loons scored to draw it even in about the 90th minute and then proceeded to win it in stoppage time. There was pic of Adrian celebrating the goal right in front of us that seemed to be used everywhere.

Haven't sat in the Wonderwall yet. We did sit in the supporter's section at US Bank a couple of times, though.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
25,734
18,482
113
As has been said in this thread and the youth sports thread, it’s become a sport of die hards only. But it makes sense. Like golf and hockey, it is so skill dependent, that training, practicing and doing sport-specific activities get results. It isn’t like football where a big or athletic kid can show up in 9th grade and quickly become a good player. If you never play baseball or have rarely played more than rev league, you are so far behind in HS that it’s damn near impossible to catch up. If your kid loves baseball and you are willing to shell out a couple grand a year, your kid is going to be a good baseball player almost for sure.

IMO this is why football is never going away. It's a game that isn't so skill dependent. Baseball, soccer, basketball, are just so skill driven that kids need to start the grind early. Football I'm not even sure how beneficial it is to start early because the body types are so different.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0u812

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
11,126
16,986
113
IMO this is why football is never going away. It's a game that isn't so skill dependent. Baseball, soccer, basketball, are just so skill driven that kids need to start the grind early. Football I'm not even sure how beneficial it is to start early because the body types are so different.
My in laws have a bunch of old HS football coaches. They said tackle before 7th is counterproductive. They even said they don’t care if a kid plays in JH. As long as the kid is in sports in JH they don’t think it matters. Member of ISU staff told me essentially the same thing a couple years ago when our kids were playing basketball together.
 

NoCreativity

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
10,826
9,761
113
Des Moines
I've been to a few Iowa Cubs games the last few years and the pitch clock does help speed up the game. It seems it's more of a suggestion than a rule though.

I would rather watch a random Tuesday game between the Pirates and Marlins before I'll watch a soccer game.

Soccer is just too frustrating for me. It reminds me of basketball if the players dribbled and passed around the entire court and once every 5 or 6 minutes someone actually takes a shot.
 

agrabes

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2006
1,665
493
83
One that football can give you though is, you may have only been able to see the ball, but you missed the great pancake block of the outside receiver breaking loose and not being noticed. They will show those replays and fills the void. You may see a substitution that intrigues you. The big then is also that third down creates a little suspense, if they will convert or not. Soccer doesn't have that.

Exactly - this is why football is still exciting despite the fact that it really is mostly downtime. Each play is distinct and you and the announcers build up to each play. There are so many moving parts and pieces that contribute to a successful play. So leading up to a big 3rd and long you can look at the positioning of the offense and defense, watch the pre-snap reads and adjustments made by each team, and then look at the replay afterward from 2-3 different camera angles to show what different players were doing to contribute.

Compare that to baseball - leading up to each pitch really all you can do is wonder if it will be a strike or ball. Maybe if you're a highly educated fan you can think about what pitch type will be thrown. In a few rare situations you can think about or wonder if the batter will try to bunt or hit a sac fly.

The big difference is that between football plays there is a lot to talk about and think about because there's a lot that could be done by either the offense or the defense. There isn't only one optimal strategy. In between pitches there's not much that can happen. The pitcher will throw a pitch, the batter will swing or not swing and hit or not hit. In rare cases a runner might try to steal. Other than the pitcher, catcher, and batter, the rest of the players are not doing anything interesting the vast majority of the time. Now imagine if the rules were different and the pitcher could toss the ball back to the second baseman and let the second baseman throw the pitch from his position, resulting in an automatic strikeout if it is a strike that would be an interesting game. You could talk about what the pitcher was going to do on any given play. Maybe the rules are changed so that the batter has some way to do something other than swing or not swing. Maybe if he can run halfway to first base before being tagged he gets to steal first? Baseball needs more variety and more possibilities for something unexpected to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCClone

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
11,126
16,986
113
Exactly - this is why football is still exciting despite the fact that it really is mostly downtime. Each play is distinct and you and the announcers build up to each play. There are so many moving parts and pieces that contribute to a successful play. So leading up to a big 3rd and long you can look at the positioning of the offense and defense, watch the pre-snap reads and adjustments made by each team, and then look at the replay afterward from 2-3 different camera angles to show what different players were doing to contribute.

Compare that to baseball - leading up to each pitch really all you can do is wonder if it will be a strike or ball. Maybe if you're a highly educated fan you can think about what pitch type will be thrown. In a few rare situations you can think about or wonder if the batter will try to bunt or hit a sac fly.

The big difference is that between football plays there is a lot to talk about and think about because there's a lot that could be done by either the offense or the defense. There isn't only one optimal strategy. In between pitches there's not much that can happen. The pitcher will throw a pitch, the batter will swing or not swing and hit or not hit. In rare cases a runner might try to steal. Other than the pitcher, catcher, and batter, the rest of the players are not doing anything interesting the vast majority of the time. Now imagine if the rules were different and the pitcher could toss the ball back to the second baseman and let the second baseman throw the pitch from his position, resulting in an automatic strikeout if it is a strike that would be an interesting game. You could talk about what the pitcher was going to do on any given play. Maybe the rules are changed so that the batter has some way to do something other than swing or not swing. Maybe if he can run halfway to first base before being tagged he gets to steal first? Baseball needs more variety and more possibilities for something unexpected to happen.

That's a very important point and distinction between football and baseball. While the downtime might be similar, football plays are pretty unique and widely varying. For the most part, seeing a ball, strike, double, homerun, etc. there's nothing to unique or exciting. Only great defensive plays are really exciting highlights in my opinion. And unfortunately as mentioned earlier, that has really been drastically reduced due to the emphasis on taking walks and hitting HRs.

In my opinion baseball HAS to be dramatically faster in pace of play if it has any hope of staying as a major sport in the US over the next few decades. It's not going to be good enough to say, see the games aren't really THAT much longer. They need to contract the games so they are shorter than they have been in decades in my opinion. Also, I think they should bite the bullet and reduce number of games by quite a bit. Raise the stakes of the games. Expand the playoffs to get more teams in contention.

I do think they need to figure out a way to get more action - more balls in play, more swings, more defensive plays. I have no idea how you might do that in a realistic way other than deadening the balls to make it much harder to hit HRs. A really wild idea might be to take a page out of the extra innings rule and start some innings with a guy on 1st. To make it even more exciting, allow the team to put any guy they want in that role. He wouldn't be in the lineup necessarily, it would be almost like a designated runner. Then you could have a base stealing specialist on the roster that has an impact.