I’m beginning to think (hope) the debate isn’t as much political as it is one group thinking everything possible should be done to limit each individual’s potential exposure vs another group that wants to take a more pragmatic approach.
Nice strawman!
Clearly competent preparation, starting years ago, particularly in 2017, but extremely heightened in December is the real answer. I put most of that failure at the federal jurisdiction, but states aren’t without some cutting of corners to appease their favorite constituents.
1.) do basically nothing
2.)slowly dipping our toes in/taking 5 seconds to rip the band aid
3.) swift, drastic actions to minimize the total disruption while buying time to recover from the past federal failures
4.) do everything possible
Between those 4 options, I don’t think many would start with 4.), I believe we have too much of 2.) rather than 3.). We’re going to end up with a lot of economic pain without really doing much imo.
It may not be popular (lacks humanity), but I’d actually lean towards 1.) before 4.) or even 2.) if we knew more about the actual mortality rate and long term impacts (reoccurrence, lasting damage).