I think the whole "liability if you catch it thing" is so overdone. Sure, people may try. But I can't see someone being held liable for someone catching an airborne virus.
Coronavirus Coronavirus: In-Iowa General Discussion (Not Limited)
- Thread starter Jer
- Start date
- Status
I think the whole "liability if you catch it thing" is so overdone. Sure, people may try. But I can't see someone being held liable for someone catching an airborne virus.
Agree to an extent. Once the "groups over XX people" are lifted there wouldn't be a basis, but while those are in place there is a basis to sue.
You might be able to, but when the country is looking at 25% or more unemployment, it cannot keep up these distancing measures indefinitely. It goes far beyond just wanting to be around people again. Most people can deal with that. Most people can with deal staying at home unless they need to leave to go to the grocery store. I'm guessing you wouldn't think the same if you managed a restaurant, or almost any other store. That type of unemployment is going to have negative impacts on pretty much every business eventually.
Lol this isn't your typical run of the day virus.. It's literally shut down the world.
I’m already sick and tired of not being sick and tired. Better than the alternative though I guess.
Yup I have happily gone along with all of this but several months without seeing friends and family or hanging out in any public area and I am going to start losing it
Okay so can someone explain this to me.. I know some of you have already discussed this, but Reisetter and Reynolds were claiming this data is wrong, however the model literally states this data is being based on the assumption these places are going to institute social distancing measures? That means the social distancing data is already built in right?
If that's true, then this data is in fact true right? Or at least a somewhat credible projection?
If that's true, then this data is in fact true right? Or at least a somewhat credible projection?
Does Covid-19 even make the top 5 list of bad things you could get at the fair?
I mentioned this earlier. Reynolds's entire team either didn't bother to read the FAQ or assumed nobody else would bother.
https://cyclonefanatic.com/forum/th...sion-no-politics.255342/page-171#post-7096458
So apparently they can't do the thermometer thing because nobody wants to get up early enough to meet contractors in the morning so we had to fill out a questionnaire asking us if we had a fever and felt okay. That was the extent of temperature taking today.
Yes, these are done online now all the time. The vast majority of producers that raise breeding bulls or registered seed stock broadcast the sale in real time on the internet and have options for online bidding, and have been doing this for quite awhile.
Producers can also sell large groups of calves online through video marketing. Superior Livestock started video marketing cattle in the late 1980's and transitioned it to the web. Great option to sell directly off the farm without having to take calves through a sale barn, reducing the transfer of infectious disease and also saving the producer from paying yardage and some commission from the sale.
My dad is 68 and has bought a dozen bulls online; watches a lot of sales during the winter without buying as well. 10 years ago I would've described him as technologically inept and I'm still a little amazed he can pull this off.
They assume we will do that 7 days from the current model. However, we've been doing all those things for ~14 days. So the model will still be flawed in its assumptions for at least 7 days into the model until they have our current conditions accurately reflected in the model. If the IDPH doesn't reach out to get the conditions corrected, the model will still continue to be incorrect 7 days at a time.
CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
Working from home full time for the past three years has prepped me for this. It’s actually annoying that I can’t be by myself more now.
- Status
