Johnson, Polk, Linn, and Dubuque.No. I'm saying if we tested more we would know who had it and where the hot spots were.
Johnson, Polk, Linn, and Dubuque.No. I'm saying if we tested more we would know who had it and where the hot spots were.
She needs to tell essential workers to stay home unless they are in an emergency field. You have constructions sites with 100 people on them and 3 pissers.Pretty much what we already have in place. I don't see the point.
The word of people testing positive twice is bad
She needs to tell essential workers to stay home unless they are in an emergency field. You have constructions sites with 100 people on them and 3 pissers.
No. I'm saying if we tested more we would know who had it and where the hot spots were.
Construction company lawyers will have exemption papers drafted for them if they haven't already.
I'm already carrying the legal paperwork for my industry.
Weitz try's throwing you off a job if your safety glasses aren't on straight but have no concerns about this virus. It's nuts dude.No one outside of China has reported that happening.
So you're part of the problem that thinks they are essential?
Johnson, Polk, Linn, and Dubuque.
No one outside of China has reported that happening.
The number of tests in a certain area or county is dependent upon the number of people who present with symptoms and the attending determines should be tested. We know where our hot spots currently are. There isn't a cluster of people somewhere in Iowa going untested and dying off or being hospitalized.But how many tests have occurred in the other counties?
The key to getting control on this is mass testing.
CIA?Nope, I am essential for several reasons that I'd prefer not to discuss on a forum.
That being said, I go to my job and am in contact with no additional people and then come home where my family has been sheltered in place for 3 weeks now. Only leave the house for the essential nature of my job and once every other week to the grocery store.
You'll be disappointed. Everything that would be closed under "stay at home" is already in place in Iowa.
You'll be disappointed. Everything that would be closed under "stay at home" is already in place in Iowa.
She could order it and say the only reason you can leave your house is for essential needs.
I've said before we have a de facto stay-at-home order in place. But an official order might still have some substance in keeping more workers at home.
Ultimately the surrounding states (MN,WI,IL,now KS) implementing these is why I think she might feel obligated to issue an official order. She has said in her pressers a stay at home order isn't necessary yet, but has never ruled it out.
If she doesn't announce it tomorrow, I'm more inclined to think we won't get one. But things are still changing every day, so who knows
Wouldn't a stay at home order include all nonessential employees?