CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
Just look at the facts.
I did. Thanks.
Just look at the facts.
Yeah he has had some lows but for a five year period he has more tournament champions than Floyd and has a more difficult schedule. And I doubt anyone thinks Prohm has a better resume than Morgan. And if you look at Floyd’s resume it was only four years his percentage would have went down after that fifth year.Disagree.
last 6 ISU coaches win %
Hoiberg .673
Floyd .633
Eustachy .631
Morgan .585
Prohm .580
McDermott .456
yes I know Steve has taken teams to ncaa tournament, yes I know he has 2 big 12 tournament championships. Steve has had incredible highs, he’s also had some astounding lows, let’s weigh all those things when viewing Steve Prohm as a coach
if we had LW or THT this year......we would still suck. both of those guys were turnover prone, took bad shots, and were horrendous on defense.
prohm is actually getting a break with those guys leaving. we'd be much more angry had one of those guys stayed.
We need another Deandre Kane who can run the team, provide leadership and toughness and just be a little nasty.
It’s looking like Young could have a big Senior year.
woof think of how good Fred would have been had he inherited what prohm did. Instead of DG and a bunch of C team allstars.Disagree.
last 6 ISU coaches win %
Hoiberg .673
Floyd .633
Eustachy .631
Morgan .585
Prohm .580
McDermott .456
yes I know Steve has taken teams to ncaa tournament, yes I know he has 2 big 12 tournament championships. Steve has had incredible highs, he’s also had some astounding lows, let’s weigh all those things when viewing Steve Prohm as a coach
The only surprise early departure that affected this year was THT leaving after 1 year. LW was always thought to be 2 and done. TH leaving early doesn’t hurt till next year. Lard couldn’t have been a surprise within the program and was a gamble since before he got here.Prohm's had a really unlucky combination and bad timing for really good players leaving early or busting on freshmen that never really develop at any point.
It is ultimately his fault, yes, but most a few players around 1-2 years to stagger the talent gaps or have one or two of the early departures stick around, and this roster looks really different and we are probably at least competitive right now.
This is true. Everyone has elevated their play, not drastically but it's at least a start. Jackson is looking more fluid, Grill made some nice passes in the last few games, Lewis has scored his highest to date, Young is looking stronger by the day, Jacobsen has had a bit of a resurrection. Not good enough obviously, this team has gaping holes from all the people that left last season. Hoping this new class will be ready to go, and Prohm can find a way to get more out of his guys early in the season.Hated to lose Haliburton as he was a fun player to watch but I think this team improves more the rest of the year without him. The other guys have to step up and not expect Tyrese to do it all. Thanks Tyrese you are a great Cyclone!
woof think of how good Fred would have been had he inherited what prohm did. Instead of DG and a bunch of C team allstars.
I am pretty sure I read something that when THT committed he said he would like to be a 2 and done. If he stays ISU is the team we have minus Grill...So you would have 2 (most likely) 1st round picks. THT would be the ball dominate go get a bucket player, TH gets to be the facilitator and spot up guy...Bolton is the third option and everyone else drops in the pecking order....not sure what I am getting at but with how CSP thought this roster was going to look last fall it didn't really give him a chance to get a replacement player. Instead he got a more than likely 4 year role player in Grill.The only surprise early departure that affected this year was THT leaving after 1 year. LW was always thought to be 2 and done. TH leaving early doesn’t hurt till next year. Lard couldn’t have been a surprise within the program and was a gamble since before he got here.
If one player leaving early causes your program to crater you’ve got a problem.
Ok well if the don’t count when you are the one coaching, when do they count?
This is also something to consider and it's an excuse...CSP had zero freshmen and only NWB as a underclassmen on hisf team at ISU... SOLO amd T Lew( if he stays) will be the first guys CSP will have go all the way through the program in 6 years. The 17-18 was a short sighted down year but until this program gets 4 years guys in the system we will struggle.Fred also inherited four years of Ejim which was pretty huge.
I am pretty sure I read something that when THT committed he said he would like to be a 2 and done. If he stays ISU is the team we have minus Grill...So you would have 2 (most likely) 1st round picks. THT would be the ball dominate go get a bucket player, TH gets to be the facilitator and spot up guy...Bolton is the third option and everyone else drops in the pecking order....not sure what I am getting at but with how CSP thought this roster was going to look last fall it didn't really give him a chance to get a replacement player. Instead he got a more than likely 4 year role player in Grill.
When this class was signed it seemed to me that he was getting guys that would be the 7-10 guys of the bench and be able to be able to develop this year and contribute next year and beyond and be more the staple in the program. Again not sure where I am getting at but these are my thoughts.
The only surprise early departure that affected this year was THT leaving after 1 year. LW was always thought to be 2 and done. TH leaving early doesn’t hurt till next year. Lard couldn’t have been a surprise within the program and was a gamble since before he got here.
If one player leaving early causes your program to crater you’ve got a problem.
The only surprise early departure that affected this year was THT leaving after 1 year. LW was always thought to be 2 and done. TH leaving early doesn’t hurt till next year. Lard couldn’t have been a surprise within the program and was a gamble since before he got here.
If one player leaving early causes your program to crater you’ve got a problem.