It's Possible......

chuckd4735

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2006
28,825
10,558
113
40
Indianola
It's not true. Prohm was Pollard's choice. And what exactly does "the story lines up/makes sense" mean?

The fact that Jamie was meeting with TJ prior to Hoibergs departure (when he knew it was highly likely Fred was leaving), the fact that TJ "randomly" came back to ISU knowing Hoiberg was likely leaving, as well as other things that happened between Leath/Pollard/TJ during the hiring process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xboxfever

harimad

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2016
7,381
11,777
113
50
Illinois
Not sure why, but I saw this thread title and thought Kim Possible before opening it. Disappointed at the lack of Shego.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jcyclonee

ISUCubswin

Well-Known Member
Mar 3, 2011
23,304
6,350
113
My Playhouse
For starters, he did what we wanted him to do. Who ever complained when Prohm got raises or extensions? Nobody.

I was very against it - dude went 9-9 in conference play with a loaded roster and was given a raise and extension for having 3 good days of coaching as opposed to 5 months of mediocre coaching. Then sucked against Ohio State.

I stand by he was given a raise/extension because JP was afraid of Prohm leaving.

Now we’re probably going to be a bottom 2 team in the Big 12 3 out of 4 years, but **** he won’t a Big 12 Tournament the lone year, so lets extend him!
 

IcSyU

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2007
27,752
5,942
113
Rochester, MN
It is Pollards fault. He had an out last spring. Hoiberg put Nebby on hold watching the ISU situation. Bama had eyes on Prohm (ended up with Oates). This could have happened. Pollard chose Prohm over Freddy, plain and simple.
There was no "situation." You're out of your damn mind if you think Jamie was going to fire a coach who just won the Big 12 tournament and made the tournament. That would've been suicide for ever hiring another quality coach.

"Go coach at Iowa State...they think so highly of themselves despite not actually accomplishing anything that they canned a coach who went to the tournament."
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
24,971
22,034
113
Dez Moy Nez
Well if the best winning pct in program history doesn’t qualify as better than “good”, I guess that speaks to our program.
We could have and probably should have won more games was all I was getting at. Prohm's performance is awful right now no doubt, but plenty of people complained about Fred on here as well. Tons of revisionist history around here.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: CycloneVet

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
9,357
9,145
113
39
For starters, he did what we wanted him to do. Who ever complained when Prohm got raises or extensions? Nobody. Same as how nobody complains when Campbell gets them now.

As it happens, tonight I stumbled into Pollard's tweet from last March announcing Prohm's extension. It's full of replies, almost universally positive, including people I follow on Twitter who praised the move at the time and have since checked out entirely.

This is a total hindsight bias situation, and we're as much to blame as Pollard.
Wrong.

There were many fans that had doubts. Of course the normal herd of idiots here attempted to drown them out, but to say nobody complained is false.
 

IcSyU

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2007
27,752
5,942
113
Rochester, MN
I was very against it - dude went 9-9 in conference play with a loaded roster and was given a raise and extension for having 3 good days of coaching as opposed to 5 months of mediocre coaching. Then sucked against Ohio State.

I stand by he was given a raise/extension because JP was afraid of Prohm leaving.

Now we’re probably going to be a bottom 2 team in the Big 12 3 out of 4 years, but **** he won’t a Big 12 Tournament the lone year, so lets extend him!
Coaches are always going to be preemptively extended so none are ever in lame duck territory sitting in a recruit's living room.

When extensions are offered, Pollard has the wallets of the people who actually matter behind him. He can fire Prohm tomorrow and have the buyout taken care of with a couple phone calls. His job isn't to be knee jerk like people on a message board.

In Pollard's position, hiring is more or less a crapshoot. Iowa State isn't a destination job where we get to pull a proven commodity from a similar institution... we're rolling the dice and hoping for the best. Look at the college AD landscape and you won't find many ADs who nailed every hire.

In some ways, Prohm is a victim of his own success recruiting. Getting guys like Wigginton and THT on campus is awesome...until they both leave and you're now left with a huge hole in your roster that's not exactly easy to fill because you couldn't plan on them leaving because they were underclassmen. Then they leave and the players who you would've liked to fill the spot are already signed elsewhere because you didn't have spots open.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: MeowingCows

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
54,100
62,261
113
Ankeny
Man, how far Scott Drew has come in the eyes of CF.

Since establishing his program he's had a floor of NIT (one being an NIT championship), so he's never bottomed out like we did a couple years ago and appear to be now, a couple elite 8s, a couple more trips to the sweet 16, and he's done that at Baylor, a terrible place for basketball.

Its not going to happen, of course, but i mean, if you were offered an even trade, Prohm for Drew, you'd have to take it, right?
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
24,971
22,034
113
Dez Moy Nez
Since establishing his program he's had a floor of NIT (one being an NIT championship), so he's never bottomed out like we did a couple years ago and appear to be now, a couple elite 8s, a couple more trips to the sweet 16, and he's done that at Baylor, a terrible place for basketball.

Its not going to happen, of course, but i mean, if you were offered an even trade, Prohm for Drew, you'd have to take it, right?
I'm not after Prohm's head like others. I acknowledge things are not good but I also think some of that is out of Steve's control. Based on experience obvious that Drew is more qualified.
 

CloneIce

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
36,575
19,419
113
Just guessing, but I imagine it has something to do with turning our dumpster fire of a men's basketball program into a relevant, nationally recognized program and ushering in one of the best eras Iowa State basketball has ever seen.

Yep. I’m sick of hearing fans downgrade what he and his Cyclone players accomplished because they are mad at him.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
17,473
27,576
113
Just guessing, but I imagine it has something to do with turning our dumpster fire of a men's basketball program into a relevant, nationally recognized program and ushering in one of the best eras Iowa State basketball has ever seen.
Ok... but you are still pining for someone who left you for a millionaire and is now dating the meth head at the trailer park.
 

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
24,996
37,025
113
Waukee
Since establishing his program he's had a floor of NIT (one being an NIT championship), so he's never bottomed out like we did a couple years ago and appear to be now, a couple elite 8s, a couple more trips to the sweet 16, and he's done that at Baylor, a terrible place for basketball.

Its not going to happen, of course, but i mean, if you were offered an even trade, Prohm for Drew, you'd have to take it, right?

Baylor ha$ certain other advantage$ if you know what I mean.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Cy$

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
21,796
22,774
113
Ok... but you are still pining for someone who left you for a millionaire and is now dating the meth head at the trailer park.

I don't think I'm pining for anyone. I don't care if he comes back. I just think it's crazy some people hold him in disregard given what he was able to do for our program.