All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

[Statefan10]

Think you guys get the call?

Iowa State's not leaving the Big 12.

 

[CyTwins]

Purdy or Stanley @Lemmiwinks ?

 

[JP4CY]

FWIW, Rutgers has scored 6 total touchdowns this year in 9 conference games.. 6. Lol

LOL, 6? That is bad

Have you checked out NW?
Their QBs account for 6 passing TDs, 15 INTs for the entire year.

 

[Statefan10]

Have you checked out NW?
Their QBs account for 6 passing TDs, 15 INTs for the entire year.

That's terrible lol. I guess Rutgers are a little better: 3 QB's accounting for 7 TD's and 15 INTs. Lol

 

[Gonzo]

Thinking about who the big ten has been getting for teams. Rutgers and Maryland were the last two, neither would be considered good teams. Before that Nebraska, they were on a downward fall for 10 years or so before the picked them up. Think maybe a wake forest will be the next team they take, maybe Syracuse. Then again they might be better than what they have been taking lately.

Nebby's final 10 years prior to joining B1G:

2001: 11-2 1st T (Big 12 North)
2002: 7-7 4th
2003: 10-3 2nd
2004: 5-6 3rd
2005: 8-4 2nd T
2006: 9-5 1st
2007: 5-7 5th T
2008: 9-4 1st T
2009: 10-4 1st T
2010: 10-4 1st T

If anything they were trending up.

 

[TRYHARDER]

Yup.. 6 is absolutely terrible, and the funny thing is that they scored half of those against Ohio State, which is ranked the top defense in the country. I'm not dogging Ohio State either, it was 35-7 at half and I'm sure OSU started playing their backups and played with far less intensity.

Nobody can or will defend Rutgers terribleness. Maybe they can get back on track with Schiano. I thought at the time it was a mistake to bring them into the conference and I still do. They alone drag down everybody who plays them SOS.

 

[Lemmiwinks]

Oh I'm sorry, I mistakenly confused you of using the transitive property on one game, not all of them...

But then again, weren't YOU the one that claims to be a subject expert on the matter, while all the time demonstrating you don't understand the principle at all by taking it to a new level each and every time.

I wouldn't call myself an expert on the subject of the transitive property (not sure how one would get that status to be honest) but I understand how it is applied. I even gave two examples of how its commonly used. Me saying Iowa would not lose to UNI this year is my informed opinion, not because I'm deducing the outcome from the ISU/Iowa game. That is a really bad take, even for the ISR forum.

 

[Statefan10]

Nobody can or will defend Rutgers terribleness. Maybe they can get back on track with Schiano. I thought at the time it was a mistake to bring them into the conference and I still do. They alone drag down everybody who plays them SOS.

It's not all about winning either.. it's about making a team competitive and Rutgers just isn't competitive.. at all.

 

[Lemmiwinks]

Purdy or Stanley @Lemmiwinks ?

Deuce Hogan

 

[Statefan10]

Deuce Hogan

Felipe Franks?

 

[CyTwins]

Deuce Hogan

Is he the starter next year? Not gonna lie I'm worried Iowa might get a good QB soon

 

[JP4CY]

Nebby's final 10 years prior to joining B1G:

2001: 11-2 1st T (Big 12 North)
2002: 7-7 4th
2003: 10-3 2nd
2004: 5-6 3rd
2005: 8-4 2nd T
2006: 9-5 1st
2007: 5-7 5th T
2008: 9-4 1st T
2009: 10-4 1st T
2010: 10-4 1st T

If anything they were trending up.

Remember, 4 noncons in those days though and getting to skip half of OU/Okie St/UT/aTm every year.

 

[Lemmiwinks]

Is he the starter next year? Not gonna lie I'm worried Iowa might get a good QB soon

Not sure. I just hope we can hold on to him until signing day. Shunning Georgia, Baylor, OSU, and ISU is one thing, but if some other big programs come calling it might get interesting.

 

[CyTwins]

Not sure. I just hope we can hold on to him until signing day. Shunning Georgia, Baylor, OSU, and ISU is one thing, but if some other big programs come calling it might get interesting.

Try having to sweat out a battle with Bama for a QB recruit. That was insane

 

[JP4CY]

Not sure. I just hope we can hold on to him until signing day. Shunning Georgia, Baylor, OSU, and ISU is one thing, but if some other big programs come calling it might get interesting.

I would safely assume that Baylor will be getting negatively recruited against a lot. Rhule is not a long term guy there.

 

[Lemmiwinks]

I would safely assume that Baylor will be getting negatively recruited against a lot. Rhule is not a long term guy there.

True, but with the mess Texas is in, where Tech is currently, and TCU being meh or worse the meh for 3 of the last 4 seasons, I still think they're an attractive option for Texas kids.

 

[JP4CY]

True, but with the mess Texas is in, where Tech is currently, and TCU being meh or worse the meh for 3 of the last 4 seasons, I still think they're an attractive option for Texas kids.

I don't think Texas, Baylor, and possibly TCU/Tech (who knows) will have the same head coaches 4 years from now.
The whole State is kind of a football mess right now. If Riley didn't appear to be the next Cowboys HC he could totally clean house recruiting down there.

 

[Lemmiwinks]

I don't think Texas, Baylor, and possibly TCU/Tech (who knows) will have the same head coaches 4 years from now.
The whole State is kind of a football mess right now. If Riley didn't appear to be the next Cowboys HC he could totally clean house recruiting down there.

Will be interesting to see what happens at Texas. There are only so many assistant coaches on the market. Herman might be pulling double, or triple duty in the next few years.

 

[TRYHARDER]

Is he the starter next year? Not gonna lie I'm worried Iowa might get a good QB soon

I'm worried that the Cyclones might take the CyHawk game seriously again at some point and actually think that it's important to win.

 

[herbicide]

I wouldn't call myself an expert on the subject of the transitive property (not sure how one would get that status to be honest) but I understand how it is applied. I even gave two examples of how its commonly used. Me saying Iowa would not lose to UNI this year is my informed opinion, not because I'm deducing the outcome from the ISU/Iowa game. That is a really bad take, even for the ISR forum.

Then why do you keep bringing it up?

Your own words:

I think you should brush up on the transitive property, you’re not using it correctly here.

.....

Making an inference that Iowa wouldn’t lose to UNI based off watching the teams play other games and utilizing data since the Cleveland/Harrison administrations isn’t using the transitive property. You might not agree with it, but it’s not the transitive property.

What you are describing here is an application of the transitive property; observing the results from one set of data and applying to a different set of data.