There was an article the Wall Street Journal put out a few years ago where they concluded that there's a strong correlation between the number of starts on the OL and wins. Unfortunately this doesn't bode well for ISU next year.
There was an article the Wall Street Journal put out a few years ago where they concluded that there's a strong correlation between the number of starts on the OL and wins. Unfortunately this doesn't bode well for ISU next year.
Let's face it, the OL needs to be improved next year, or we'll be looking at 6 or 7 wins again.
So can it be improved after losing 4 starters next year? I do think there's hope that it can be, but I wonder if CMC is considering adding a JUCO or a transfer? Thoughts?
You have to figure the starters (and a few backups) will look something like this....
T- Ramos/Foster
G- Hudson
C- Newell/Schweiger
G- Downing
T- Treiber/Foster
..... and then others in the mix will be... Hufford, Remsburg, Kleinow, Ross, Simmons... with true freshman coming in... Tyler Miller, Pauls, Petersen, and Rengert.
I just think looking at the youth and inexperience of that starting 5 that CMC might be thinking of adding a more experienced JUCO or transfer into the mix?
Yep, kinda shows how not good we were on the OL.We had a shitload of starts returning this year...
The problem is the O-line. Has been for a long time. I / we say it every year...
When they get push, open holes, and protect the QB -- many happy points are scored.
When they get bullied around - whether thru scheme (UNI every gd year) or thru physicality (Iowa this year, Texas last year, K St 2 nights ago) then the offense really struggles.
Clones got beat up front saturday night, and that is still how you win/lose football games. Plus 2 on turnovers, and lost by 10??? They got manhandled by K State, period.
Iowa State was one of the least penalized teams in the country... Friday was an anomaly but false starts tend to happen frequently when you are absolutely getting your *ss kicked in the trenches.
The O-line was better than last year.All season the media wrote about how great and improved our O line is. I couldn't stand it. Not once did we control the game with the run, or take over with it. Breece had his moments but a lot of those were on him, not gaping holes. There are two players that are Big 12 level starters on that line. Downing and Knipfel. Everyone else is replaceable.
We were literally one of the least penalized teams in the country this season. JFC 6-7 false starts was not the norm.
Did it against WSU, Baylor and KSU. That is plenty of times for me to be concerned.
We were literally one of the least penalized teams in the country this season. JFC 6-7 false starts was not the norm.
Well that's not saying much...The O-line was better than last year.
Did it against WSU, Baylor and KSU. That is plenty of times for me to be concerned.
All season the media wrote about how great and improved our O line is. I couldn't stand it. Not once did we control the game with the run, or take over with it. Breece had his moments but a lot of those were on him, not gaping holes. There are two players that are Big 12 level starters on that line. Downing and Knipfel. Everyone else is replaceable.
Thanks for putting this together - I think it is safe to say the 6 in those two games may have impacted the outcome. With the youth of next years line if they can avoid having games like this they could be just as good as this year's line but will have more years ahead of themselves rather than this being the pinnacle.Breakdown of false starts in each game:
UNI 0
Iowa 2
ULM 1
Baylor 0
TCU 1
WVU 2
TTech 1
OSU 1
OU 6
Texas 0
Kansas 1
KSU 6