All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

[dexterhawk]

Just messing around.

I know

I’m grumpy after losses.

 

[Gonzo]

Bruh.....O’rien Vance is like, 3rd or 4th in the NCAA in total sacks and you don’t even have him on there?

He's good. I like the 3 I have in there better.

 

[iahawks]

Yeah it seems like you both misunderstood my post that talked about decades of fan reaction and instead thought I was analyzing one or two games.

At least you're polite in your misunderstanding of the meaning of my post unlike your caveman friend Waukee.

For about a decade all ISU fans heard from Iowa was that they hated how ISU would beat Iowa and then not beat anyone good in Big 12 play. They were pretty much right.

Now over the past two years ISU plays one of it's most mistake filled games losing Iowa, then goes on to clean things up, beat ranked Big 12 teams and finish near the top of the Big 12. Basically they're now delivering what Iowa fan crybabies were asking for in years past and also losing to Iowa consistently instead of beating them most of the time like Mac did.

I understand what you are trying to say, but it isn’t like Iowa has been awful after the ISU game these past two years. They have still been better than ISU and have had some nice wins.

 

[Brandon]

5 in a row has y’all losing your minds, not gonna be pretty next year when it moves to six

We're on to conference games, Iowa may want to move on as well.

 

[HFCS]

I understand what you are trying to say, but it isn’t like Iowa has been awful after the ISU game these past two years. They have still been better than ISU and have had some nice wins.

My post was only about ISU.

Freakazoid Waukee freaked out and maybe you got sucked into his freak spaz post.

It's pretty clear ISU lately doesn't play it's greatest all time game against Iowa, loses to Iowa, then goes on to play better than it has in many decades in conference play. Pretty much the exact opposite of Mac years where Iowa fans had a point that we laid an egg after beating them.

 

[iahawks]

My post was only about ISU.

Freakazoid Waukee freaked out and maybe you got sucked into his freak spaz post.

It's pretty clear ISU lately doesn't play it's greatest all time game against Iowa, loses to Iowa, then goes on to play better than it has in many decades in conference play. Pretty much the exact opposite of Mac years where Iowa fans had a point that we laid an egg after beating them.

Sorry, wasn’t following all that. I usually ignore that guy.

 

[CyTwins]

 

[HFCS]

Hopefully we're finally turning the corner at oline after all these years.

It really did seem like one of the better games from them in the 22 years I've been a fan.

 

[dexterhawk]

Iowa and Michigan played putrid offensively today. I get that both have really good defenses but that was tough to watch.

It was putrid for sure.

 

[Cat Stevens]

Both teams are 1-1 in conference so far.

what are your thoughts on waukee representing you as a hawk fan.

 

[Cat Stevens]

I understand what you are trying to say, but it isn’t like Iowa has been awful after the ISU game these past two years. They have still been better than ISU and have had some nice wins.

this is really stupid even for you.

 

[Cat Stevens]

It was putrid for sure.

What are your thoughts on Waukee representing you?

 

[Waukee100]

Now ISU is clearly doing the opposite where we lose to Iowa almost every year, but then go on to beat ranked teams and finish high in the Big 12.
.

9th 7th and 3rd place finishes under Campbell in the big 12 qualifies as finishing high in the big 12? Lol good lord, absolutely delusional.

 

[Dr.bannedman]

9th 7th and 3rd place finishes under Campbell in the big 12 qualifies as finishing high in the big 12? Lol good lord, absolutely delusional.

im sry ur team lost and u will be 7-5 to 9-3, u will play in an ok bowl again but youll never make manger or make the play offs. this is the hight of your life

 

[HFCS]

9th 7th and 3rd place finishes under Campbell in the big 12 qualifies as finishing high in the big 12? Lol good lord, absolutely delusional.

Tied for fourth, 8-5 with several wins vs ranked teams = "7th"

Yeah I'm delusional. I'm kind of mocking '96 - '10 ISU teams but you're too stupid to comprehend it.

 

[DurangoCy]

Lol last 3 years - regular season wins over ranked teams Iowa - 3 Iowa State 4 - oh boy.

Of course it would be tied if you guys didn’t lay a turd against UNI this year and drop out of the rankings.

You also act like Iowa State has beaten a ranked team this year, might want to wait to see how the season plays out before boasting. As of now, it looks like Texas and OU will be your only remaining ranked opponents with the OSU loss today, good luck.

Remind me again where Iowa and Iowa state finished in the top 25 last season?

Iowa has PSU and Wisconsin left on your gaunlet

9th 7th and 3rd place finishes under Campbell in the big 12 qualifies as finishing high in the big 12? Lol good lord, absolutely delusional.

Your 7th place reference was actually a 4 way tie for 4th, but go ahead and continue to be the jerkoff that you are.

 

[clonedude]

Woof. Kind of glad I didn't have to watch all of that **** show. After week 6...

Offense: ISU

DL - Epenesa
DL - Lima
DL - Nixon
DL - Golston
LB - Rose
LB - Spears
LB - Colbert
S - Eisworth
S - Stone
CB - Hankins
CB - Oji

Are you having a bromance with Colbert or what??

Vance is probably having a better year than any defensive player on either team right now.... but not good enough to be in your top 3 LBs? Funny.

 

[clonedude]

Well, Brock now has a better completion %, better QBR, better rating, less ints, more passing yards, better rushing stats, same number of passing TDs, and more running TDs.

Yeah, but Brock is the experienced senior, and Stanley is just a young sophomore, right?

 

[Gonzo]

Are you having a bromance with Colbert or what??

Vance is probably having a better year than any defensive player on either team right now.... but not good enough to be in your top 3 LBs? Funny.

Colbert's a stud. It's a tight call for sure. Vance has great numbers. Phil rarely blitzes with LBs so comparing sack #s is kind of silly. I think Colbert's a more well-rounded LB, much better in pass coverage. But yes, Vance is having a great year so far. Good for him, like seeing local kids do well.

 

[cyrocksmypants]

Are you having a bromance with Colbert or what??

Vance is probably having a better year than any defensive player on either team right now.... but not good enough to be in your top 3 LBs? Funny.

Statistically, I’d put Vance over Rose right now even. And I ******* love Rose.