thank u chris. i love u
thank u chris. i love u
We don't need more RB's, in fact, we need less of them.why didnt we go after a juco rb?
they had to know david m was leaving.
it may not have helped.
we have to have someone that can get 2-3 yards on command.
baylor had it which is a simple explanation also why we lost.
why didnt we go after a juco rb?
they had to know david m was leaving.
it may not have helped.
we have to have someone that can get 2-3 yards on command.
baylor had it which is a simple explanation also why we lost.
We don't need more RB's, in fact, we need less of them.
You mean like when Lang was running well and making people miss? Yeah, we put Croney in then....Need one to emerge and then keep them on the field when it's going well.
RB doesn’t mean a whole lot if the o line can’t run block.
We don't need more RB's, in fact, we need less of them.
The OC and Purdy were the issue yesterday.RB doesn’t mean a whole lot if the o line can’t run block.
The two best backs averaged over 5 yards a carry. The problem isn't the backs. There was room to move. It was throwing the ball 50 times. If we keep running and make them commit to stopping it, we can be more effective throwing. We need to take what the d is giving us