ISU was 3-9 on 3rd down. They don’t hit the long ball, chances are those drives stall.
It is still a Hawkeye State
- Thread starter DuneFan
- Start date
I'll let people judge for themselves. I don't think there was enough there to call.
Here's a much more obvious missed holding call IMO (I know CyTwins and clonedude disagree):
I will say that the holding call in the 4th quarter against ISU was clearly a bad call.
First play Bailey is literally trying to get up field running to his right and Iowa RT has his left hand ahold of Bailey jersey pulling him... lmfao that’s an obvious hold..
2nd play was a hold on Meeker as well.. case in point officials wait until game is on the line to throw only holding call all game..
So you're really going all in on blaming the refs, huh?
Or not? We won’t know. Our offense likes to hit those so it’s not uncommon.
Nope. We peed the game away ourselves. Can’t turn the ball over and need to finish drives. Just mentioning there were more and the trend was not to call them all game on either side. Then out of the blue the hawk bench demands one and get the only holding penalty all day on a good block by out tackle and an *** whooping hit from our guard.
Not when two plays accounted for 120 yards
So we only count plays under 10 yards now? If a runner breaks loose he should stop after so many? Very dumb take.
What was your average of you take those plays out....two big plays skewed your yards per play
What’s more pathetic? Blaming the refs? Or running over to an opposing teams board and try to diminish them after you were given a gift because you’re too much of a douchebag to give the other team actual credit for their play?
As I was saying @Gonzo. What’s more pathetic?
Acknowledging that they made a terrible call on a hold that didn’t exist that would have given us a 1st on the hawk 24?
Or what this ******* moron is doing?
- Jun 20, 2006
- 38,265
- 22,537
- 113
Do you not have math?
In case you do have math, figure it out. Then take Iowas largest two plays out and math that.
Otherwise ... idiotic post.
It's like you're trying to say we should apologize for having playmakers. I'd rather have a one play 75 yard drive than chipping away at blown coverages down the field
You must've missed my first post after the game saying it was, as usual, a weird game and that the teams were pretty evenly matched. I know you're an angry guy in general but how much do you need that taint smooched exactly?
You must've missed my first post after the game saying it was, as usual, a weird game and that the teams were pretty evenly matched. I know you're an angry guy in general but how much do you need that taint smooched exactly?[/QUOTE]
Hey, if it gets your mind off of yesterday's "L" I'm going to chalk it up as a "W".
Not sure, don’t feel like going through drive charts and taking out anything that is considered to be a bigger than normal play.
It’s like winning a 100MM in a lotto and only keeping a mil since it’s not fair to win more than most.
Remember, they aren’t the STEM college. Especially Kirkwood. Or whatever HS he probably graduated from at best.
