A lot of Purdy's deep throws to Butler (and everyone) were right on the money. It wouldn't matter who was on the receiving end.
The pass to Jones in the back of the endzone against Baylor (?) comes to mind. In his 5th game as a TRUE FRESHMAN.
Clearly Butler's big plays and the threat he posed had a major positive impact. His astronomical drop rate (over 18%) offset that to some degree.Agree, I am hesitant to read too far into that stat as I feel Butler's big play ability really skews that average upwards and Purdy is the benefactor. I would anticipate that average coming back down to earth this year if I was putting money on it.
Where did you get that number? I thought the number was 15 and some change. Can you link your source?Clearly Butler's big plays and the threat he posed had a major positive impact. His astronomical drop rate (over 18%) offset that to some degree.
I think the narrative that Butler "bailed out" Purdy a lot is pretty clueless. There were a lot more catchable balls that were dropped than bad throws that ended as great catches. In addition to drops there were a couple balls that were on the money to Akers that bounced off of him and ended as picks. There were great catches that were also great throws (the TD to Butler vs. OSU). The second TD vs. KU and the amazing catch in the Alamo Bowl were plays that Hakeem made that were amazing on balls that were not great.
Shocked the Hawkeye fans are avoiding this thread
You're right, I've seen PFF quoted in articles at both 16.7% and 15.5%. Maybe one includes the bowl and one doesn't.Where did you get that number? I thought the number was 15 and some change. Can you link your source?
Has anyone else noticed in interviews that every question Purdy begins his answer with "yeah." That's weird.
Campbell does it all the time. Wonder where Brock got it?Ya, I’ve noticed that.
Campbell does it all the time. Wonder where Brock got it?