Big 12 Champion Computer Projection

CySmurf

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2011
4,025
5,101
113
I think the champion will come from the state of Kansas. I think K State is the best team in the conference. I think either them or KU will win the league.
It's not Kansas. K-State looks like the best team at this point. However, so much can change. Just keep winning ISU. Everything else will take care of itself.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: ComCY and surly

cyclone101

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2009
4,564
4,292
113
Dez Moinz
tenor.gif
 

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
45,766
35,131
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
It's not Kansas. K-State looks like the best team at this point. However, so much can change. Just keep winning ISU. Everything else will take care of itself.
Literally - since ISU still has game(s) against each of the teams one game ahead of them in the loss column ISU controls its own destiny again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonepride

BillBrasky4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 10, 2013
15,386
28,023
113
K-State who struggles to score still has KU twice, Baylor twice, @TCU, and @WVU. I can see purple Kansas falling back to 4th.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NazLongDoesItAgain

RonBurgundy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 5, 2017
3,163
4,324
113
41
Nerd question.
Why run 100,000 simulations? Shouldn't it just be statistical math based on odds?

While there are probabilities, there are also standard deviations around those probabilities, which differ for every team. So a Monte Carlo simulation can be used to evaluate the overall expected results. And with today's computers, would take only a minute to run once all the inputs are in.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Doc

Dale

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2010
363
1,137
93
Chicagoland
Nerd question.
Why run 100,000 simulations? Shouldn't it just be statistical math based on odds?

Great question. Yes, the ideal solution would be to work out the odds of every possible W/L combination scenario in the remaining (at this point) 53 conference games. But that means you'd have have to figure out the odds of 2^53 ≈ 9 quadrillion different scenarios, which—back of the envelope estimate—would take my computer a few centuries to finish. So the Monte Carlo simulations give you a reasonable estimate (within a couple tenths of a percent) of the real answer in two minutes or so.

When it gets closer to the end of the season, it becomes a lot more reasonable to do it the "right way"...but still, the extra accuracy it would give over 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations is very minimal.
 

fsanford

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 22, 2007
6,688
4,794
113
Los Angeles
ISU probably has the easiest road because they only have 3 games against the other contending teams Baylor, Tech, KU, KSU and 2 of them are at home.
Tech has 4 and the other 3 have 5 games.

KSU, KU and ISU have beating another contender on their home court.
All contenders but KU have lost at home.

Whoever finish 5-4 on the road probably wins this thing. KU might be able to slip by with 4-5

KU is what 1-3 with games at Tech, KSU, and TCU still to go.. This might be the year they go down
 

huntt26

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2006
10,570
2,231
113
po' dUnk
I think the Cyclones have a real good shot of at least a share of the conference title IF they stay healthy and no suspensions.
 

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
96,787
57,965
113
53
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Great question. Yes, the ideal solution would be to work out the odds of every possible W/L combination scenario in the remaining (at this point) 53 conference games. But that means you'd have have to figure out the odds of 2^53 ≈ 9 quadrillion different scenarios, which—back of the envelope estimate—would take my computer a few centuries to finish. So the Monte Carlo simulations give you a reasonable estimate (within a couple tenths of a percent) of the real answer in two minutes or so.

When it gets closer to the end of the season, it becomes a lot more reasonable to do it the "right way"...but still, the extra accuracy it would give over 100,000 Monte Carlo simulations is very minimal.

If that makes sure it's right, then do it. Get back to us when it's complete.
 

NoCreativity

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2015
10,817
9,759
113
Des Moines
Everyone plays the same schedule.

I assume he's smart enough to realize that and I assume he meant remaining schedule. K-State actually has the 6th easiest schedule left so they don't have a gauntlet by any means so Im not buying that excuse.

Of course the teams at the top are usually going to have an easier schedule left because they don't have to play themselves twice. Iowa State has the 8th easiest left.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: isutrevman

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
96,787
57,965
113
53
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
I assume he's smart enough to realize that and I assume he meant remaining schedule. K-State actually has the 6th easiest schedule left so they don't have a gauntlet by any means so Im not buying that excuse.

Of course the teams at the top are usually going to have an easier schedule left because they don't have to play themselves twice. Iowa State has the 8th easiest left.

I'm sure he did, though it's silly to complain about in a round robin.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NoCreativity

VeloClone

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2010
45,766
35,131
113
Brooklyn Park, MN
ISU probably has the easiest road because they only have 3 games against the other contending teams Baylor, Tech, KU, KSU and 2 of them are at home.
Tech has 4 and the other 3 have 5 games.

KSU, KU and ISU have beating another contender on their home court.
All contenders but KU have lost at home.

Whoever finish 5-4 on the road probably wins this thing. KU might be able to slip by with 4-5

KU is what 1-3 with games at Tech, KSU, and TCU still to go.. This might be the year they go down
To take it to the next level here is what each team within 2 games of the lead have left:

BU 5-2 (.500 remaining games teams' combined winning percentage)
5 road - 4 winning record, 1 @ .500 (.605 remaining road game teams' combined record)
6 home - 1 winning, 1 @ .500, 4 losing record (.409)

KSU 5-2 (.481)
6 road - 2 winning, 1 @ .500, 3 losing (.455)
5 home - 3 winning, 2 losing (.514)

TTU 5-3 (.459)
5 road - 2 winning, 3 losing (.459)
5 home - 2 winning, 1 @ .500, 2 losing (.459)

KU 5-3 (.451)
5 road - 2 winning, 3 losing (.486)
5 home - 3 winning, 2 losing (.500)

ISU 4-3 (.451)
5 road - 1 winning, 1 @ .500, 3 losing (.432)
6 home - 2 winning, 1 @ .500, 3 losing (.467)

UT 4-4 (.514)
5 road - 3 winning, 2 losing (.486)
5 home - 3 winning, 2 losing (.543)

TCU 3-4 (.494)
5 road - 2 winning, 1 @ .500, 2 losing (.444)
6 home - 4 winning, 2 losing (.533)