The whole thing is absurd. A professional man goes about his career. Shirley is defining himself by his time playing basketball in college. It's pathetic.
I liked Paul as a player and now. I have no doubt he's saying what will benefit him, and when it's the truth so be it if it hurts some feelings. Is he beating a dead horse or are we just older sports degenerates reading and listening to every ISU post or sound bite?
The whole thing is absurd. A professional man goes about his career. Shirley is defining himself by his time playing basketball in college. It's pathetic.
Jeez Paul, stop living in the past. Don't you know what really matters to people?
How Woody Hayes' punch screwed over Iowa State Football.
How Donnie Duncan and Jim Criner messed up Iowa State Football.
How awful person Hayden Fry was.
How big of a doucebag Bret Bielema was.
How terrible Missouri was for talking about Grayer's mother.
How bad of an AD, BVD was.
Anonymous posts on a fan website vs. using a public platform to publicly and repeatedly trash another individual. If Paul Shirley thinks Larry Eustachy is a bad person, fine. Either address it with him man to man so you can move on or just don't comment on it.
did anybody actually listen to the podcast? shirley was asked about the larry situation. do you expect him to say, 'oh, i'm not going to talk about that because a few people on cyclone fanatic might call me a whiner'.....? same podcast asked seneca wallace if he thought he was 'in' on the touchdown against florida state and nobody was on here telling seneca to get over it. i agree that it seems like shirley may need some closure on this larry stuff but some of you are acting like he's seeking out the spotlight just so he can get some attention and bash larry.
Or apparently he can come on cyclone fanatic and publically trash him anonymously.
When do you see Shirley in the news? About every six months when he brings up Eustachy. It's all that moves his professional needle.
Grow up. Someone asks Paul about a topic and he responds honestly. I'm sorry that his response paints a negative image of a former coach of your favorite team, but Paul is a little more invested in it than you. So what if he utilizes repeatedly stating how bad things were behind the scenes to sell himself, as long as it's true? Would you feel the same if he repeatedly gave glowing reports? Of course not, so just plug your ears if a little negative bothers you so. This is a you problem.It feels like he has an axe to grind with Eustachy, and it bothers me that he continues to go public with it without trying to get any resolution. I wish he would either speak to Eustachy privately to clear the air and get some things off his chest or stop constantly bringing it up in an effort to stay relevant and sell books.
He knows his audience well.When do you see Shirley in the news? About every six months when he brings up Eustachy. It's all that moves his professional needle.