Unfortunately, 200 attempts in the scenarios we found ourselves in last season is too small and irrelevant of a sample size.
I'm looking forward to seeing how he plays if/when he gets us to 3-0 playing on a big stage. Say, this year vs Texas.
Things are just different when your back isn't against the wall and you're just out there slinging it with nothing to lose.
As a baseball metrics guy, I had thought this too. Finding proper a sample size in football in general is sort of a fool's errand (13 games max) BUT as I looked over the B12 QBs, these seemed to normalize quickly.
Since I couldn't sleep in today, decided to run the B12 numbers on a per game and cumulative basis. Skipped KU since they had 3 QBs >100 atts and skipped Baylor because...I honestly forgot about them.
Color conditioned on the per game AY/A to show their good games and bad games. Green conditioned on the cumulative
to try to show when the numbers normalize.
Baker and Rudolph were solid throughout. Mahomes blew up against some terrible teams in the first 4 weeks but then tapered off. The QBs with >400 yards rushing were pretty average throughout. Hill and Shane tapered off as the schedule got difficult.
Now Park did not play against UNI or Baylor. Those games should have been a boon to his final result (and whole game against San Jose). TTech was a boon and he did okay against KSU + Oklahoma. We'll see if he can improve against Iowa, OK St and Texas.
I'd be hard pressed to call Park's 200 attempts irrelevant.