If I were ESPN I'd worry about myself being relevant in 2023.
Yes, this is the key. We succeed in the next 5-6 years in FB and it increases our place at the table.
And go purchase Cyclones.tv packages!
"The Pac-12's forecast, meanwhile, is less encouraging, and its revenue gap with other Power 5 leagues will widen before the next rights negotiation. Cal's athletic department lost $21.7 million in the 2016 fiscal year. Although the Pac-12's geography and tradition suggests members won't be looking to leave, something needs to shift before 2023."
Ouch. Maybe if Cal paraded Ann Coulter or some other right winger out at half time they could draw a crowd at least til the start of the 2nd half. (Btw, I read recently that Pollard is sitting on a $13M reserve fund. I'm all for cord cutting -- our fan base, enrollment, AAU status, and location in the central time zone might put us in the upper half of the 66 over the long haul, whatever the TV revenue model becomes.)
http://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...may-not-be-an-active-topic-but-its-out-there/
Dennis Dodd says Kansas' $300 million investment in football facilities is a to get on the radar for the next wave of realignment.
Honest question: what does the Big 12 have to gain by merging with the Pac 12? Stability maybe? Theoretically there would be less money per school and schedules would be a joke.
If interested, here's an informative look at ESPN's current situation.If I were ESPN I'd worry about myself being relevant in 2023.
Just go to eight conferences of nine (72) or eight of ten (80).
64 P5
ND and BYU
= 66
Bring up the last few stragglers in the American and MWC who have a case. Cinci, UConn, USF, UCF, Houston, and Boise State might be the list right there.
Reorganize in conferences based on history and geography.
Sign some massive TV deal together.
...done.
Why would they share the money with more schools? And you call yourself a Libertarian....
What will happen is they will pare down the teams that stay in whatever they call the P5 after 2023.
This might be relevant. We are the beggar at the table.
1. Texas: $161,035,187
2. Oklahoma: $129,226,692
3. Oklahoma State: $117,803,302
4. Kansas: $97,681,066
5. Baylor: $86,929,398
6. West Virginia: $77,626,819
7. Texas Christian: $77,068,398
8. Kansas State: $72,935,044
9. Iowa State: $68,170,381
10. Texas Tech: $76,723,413
Baylor should be left out on principle. **** those guys.
It might be relevant with some explanation of what these numbers mean.
Revenue, I thought discussing bring to the table would be clear enough. Sorry for using slang terms.It might be relevant with some explanation of what these numbers mean.
I couldn't find an original thread regarding realignment but wanted to get some thoughts on something...
If the Big 12 had decided to go with divisions for the start of this years football season, I think our chances at a Big 12 title game would be a real possibility, depending how divisions were set up.
Not sure if they would have done it geological or what but,,
ISU, KSU, KU, OSU, OU ???
I'm not sure, but having a tiebreaker of OU would have helped.
I'm just speculating here and trying to have a little fun with a "What If"
I'm going to say they wouldn't have done it geological, but that's just me.
Too bad NE, MO, and CO are still not here...life would be even easier.I couldn't find an original thread regarding realignment but wanted to get some thoughts on something...
If the Big 12 had decided to go with divisions for the start of this years football season, I think our chances at a Big 12 title game would be a real possibility, depending how divisions were set up.
Not sure if they would have done it geological or what but,,
ISU, KSU, KU, OSU, OU ???
I'm not sure, but having a tiebreaker of OU would have helped.
I'm just speculating here and trying to have a little fun with a "What If"