K
Matt Thomas on fire
- Thread starter kucyclone
- Start date
I thought a recruit couldn't be any good unless he was from Chicago or New York or other 'urban' areas?
CycloneErik
Well-Known Member
Since we've already derailed, I don't know why anybody is worried about bigs. It's 2 years out before we have to be concerned about it in the least.
Regardless, I am very excited about the future of this program.
Regardless, I am very excited about the future of this program.
I agree that we shouldn't panic. We will undoubtedly take big(s) with the '13 class. However the fact that we took 3 guards and 1 post with the '12 class, and that our top priorities (and first two commits) of '13 are guards, it has people curious as to the staff's philosophy.
Now, I don't agree that we "2 years out before we have to be concerned about it in the least." After Booker graduates, we'll have Ejim (6'-6"), Niang (6'-7") and Gibson (6'-9") to play two spots. That's not much depth. We'll need (and get) more depth for the '13-'14 season.
It is crucial to find 2 post players that can contribute at a winning level in the B12 this class.
I think we'll get them. I see us getting Hassan Martin and one more big that is 6'8" or taller.
K
KFitzy87
Guest
Bring back Railey.
I'd be interested in knowing if people would be more pumped if we got another top 150 guard as our next commit, or (considering we have no idea how he'll play/develop) a freshman Jordan Railey... I guess when I say I'd be interested in people's opinions, I mean the people that constantly scream we need big men... And no using the "well Fred's recruiting better talent now anyway so this is a stupid question" way to answer... Tell the truth: top 150 guard, or 6'10" Jordan Railey?
K
KFitzy87
Guest
K
KFitzy87
Guest
28 points... 28 starzzzzz. That's more stars then everyones stars on the current football roster combined
