And we played the majority of the conference slate not even close to full strength. Did we do that last year too?Ok, well unless we win the Big 12 tournament and National Championship we will end up with more losses than last year.
And we played the majority of the conference slate not even close to full strength. Did we do that last year too?Ok, well unless we win the Big 12 tournament and National Championship we will end up with more losses than last year.
The possibility of playing 4 games in 4 days in KC probably wouldn’t bode well for the NCAA tournament. Maybe I’m overthinking it
This is why i disagree with anyone saying it's a good effort. Of course the team is trying, but we're soft. We tried but by playing pat-a-cake We don't make the toughness plays with consistency, despite it being our "culture". Same old sh*t with this team.
This is why you can’t really put a ton of stock into a conference championship now. Houston absolutely ran it this year but there will be years where the champ benefits from the schedule.of the top 4 teams in the league, Houston, Tech, Arizona, and ISU we only had home games against AZ. I WANT home games against the other teams, that is what makes me mad about the unbalanced schedule that the other contenders got to avoid Hilton (minus arizona). Agree to disagree then.
Hate to say it but this team peaked around the first go through in the conference, and has been coasting since because of injuries and poor play. To be a great team, you have to bring your A game every night or close to it, Kansas used to be able to do that, Houston does it now. We go through stretches where we look lost and start throwing up 3 pointers that are not even close.
This seems to be a recurring theme with this coaching staff. TJ is hitting on a 75% rate of falling apart once the calendar flips to February.Hate to say it but this team peaked around the first go through in the conference,
Full strength or not, good teams don't look that completely inept against Oklahoma St and Kansas St. Those are two terrible basketball teams that took us to the woodshed.And we played the majority of the conference slate not even close to full strength. Did we do that last year too?
That technical (awful call) was the difference in the gameI think we got a favorable whistle overall, but the T on Gilbert was awful.
I mean that's one of biggest ass whoopings I've ever seen on a stat sheet.I’m sure this has been brought up many times in this thread, but the 52-24 rebounding margin pretty much explains how they did it.
Full strength or not, good teams don't look that completely inept against Oklahoma St and Kansas St. Those are two terrible basketball teams that took us to the woodshed.
Houston wouldn't have lost those games missing a starter. Last night we were at full strength. How do you explain getting down 21? How do you explain blowing an 18 point second half lead vs Auburn at full strength?
Very true, every team is going to have injuries, it's how you play through the injuries is what counts. Looked like BYU was doing a lot of pushing in the back to get rebounds last night, not trying to take anything away from them, they rebound well, but it would be interesting to watch the tape and see if they were getting away with as much pushing as it looked like last night.Full strength or not, good teams don't look that completely inept against Oklahoma St and Kansas St. Those are two terrible basketball teams that took us to the woodshed.
Houston wouldn't have lost those games missing a starter. Last night we were at full strength. How do you explain getting down 21? How do you explain blowing an 18 point second half lead vs Auburn at full strength?
I agree with all of that, though I don't really think they have a ceiling. All the pieces are there. Just need to tighten things up and catch fire a bit.Morning after.
Defensively I thought they played with great energy and effort. Great to see the defense get into lock down mode again
Offensively was not a great night for the first 25 or so minutes. ISU had a great opportunity early in the game to create separation but just couldn’t get anything going on offense.
The metal toughness is still there with this group. They are playing well as a team
I still think this team can make a run in the tournament; however, I still feel a sweet 16 might be their ceiling. But it is also great to have a program where some fans may feel disappointed with a sweet 16 exit.
The program is nationally relevant, and shows no sign of slowing down.
But that doesn’t fit the narrative.I mean they have 2 losses at full strength. If, last year, they had to play 9 games down at least 1 of their top players in the middle of conference play, they probably don’t finish above .500 in conference.
They are not worse than last year.
That technical (awful call) was the difference in the game
So much this.It's been a problem for a few years, we dribble around and then get nothing, not an even a good shot at the basket.
So much this.
They have come up with some good in-bounds and OTO plays this year, which is an improvement. But when they need that last shot bucket... its "Morgan-esque" by which I mean it looks like they haven't practiced at all.
They just force stuff into the lane, or chuck a 3 if they cant get around anyone.
Maybe we just lack the 1st round type talent guy who can make it happen on his own, or miss having Monte and Georges who were the world champion pick-and-roll/pop guys.