Thamel: The lean towards a 12-team playoff

ISUTex

Well-Known Member
May 25, 2012
9,884
9,630
113
Rural U.S.A.
One of the issues with the 4 team format is that the games aren't even guaranteed to be competitive. Since the beginning of the playoff, the average margin of victory in the 1v4 game is 18 points, in the 2v3 is 24 pts, and in the Championship is 15 pts. The largest margins of victory in each round is 35 (LSU v OU 2019) points, 39 points (Oregon v FSU 2014) , and 28 points (Clemson v Bama 2018, Bama v OSU 2020) respectively. In fact, the only year where 2 of the playoff games were decided by less than 1 score was 2017 where Georgia when into OT against OU, then Bama.

So that criticism is kind of moot, because stomps happen already and even in the Championship game. Football will always have an "Any given Saturday" where the final score isn't always representative of the quality of the team.

The four team system with the highly subjective selection committee just doesn't give enough opportunity for surprises, or dark horses. It has resulted in the stale playoff that we have come to know, where 5 schools make up 22 of the 28 participants.

You will just see more blowouts in the second rounds. Huge blowouts. Not Notre Dame losing by 17 to Bama blowouts. Think Iowa vs Stanford first half Rose Bowl type of blowouts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: agentbear

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,878
13,962
113
I really think it wont matter. Most every year the top 1-4 teams will win it all. Same thing occurs in FCS.

This.

There's a reason the AP just picked the 2 best teams every year for decades. Because half the time, there was only ONE great team. Half the time there were two great teams, or at least a 2nd that was close enough to contend. And maybe 10% of the time, there was a 3rd team good enough to debate who should get a shot at #1. And of course that is what drove the playoff and the BCS to resolve the arguments.

Which of course it didn't. Now the argument is over 4th-5th-6th. LOFL.

I only see 3 benefits of going to 12:
1. you might get an upset of a paper tiger now and again in the first round. e.g. Florida last year vs OU, or a undefeated team that has only played 1 tough game all year.
2. you might get to include a team that is really playing at a high level right now and could win it, but might have lost a couple games early because of injuries or just fluke losses
3. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
 
  • Like
Reactions: awd4cy

MeanDean

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jan 5, 2009
14,632
20,880
113
Blue Grass IA-Jensen Beach FL
I wonder if it's possible the proposal for 12 teams is a door-in-the-face strategy to expand to 8.
I would like to see someone suggest going back to an 11 game season, thus reducing "meaningless" non-conference games. There's the loss of revenue from fewer home games for teams but with some creative profit sharing from the expanded play-off game revenue that could be offset. Fewer total amateur games overall = actual reduction in injuries and time away from studies. Make it a 12 team play-off and only 4 teams play one more game than now.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,507
74,254
113
Ankeny
I would like to see someone suggest going back to an 11 game season, thus reducing "meaningless" non-conference games. There's the loss of revenue from fewer home games for teams but with some creative profit sharing from the expanded play-off game revenue that could be offset. Fewer total amateur games overall = actual reduction in injuries and time away from studies. Make it a 12 team play-off and only 4 teams play one more game than now.

This actually makes me wonder if we might see more meaningful non-conference games with a larger field.

With 4, one loss can eliminate you and two definitely does. So there's somewhat of a disincentive to schedule up, particularly if you get plenty of respect from your conference schedule as-is. With 8\12, that potential loss hurts less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclones500

DarkStar

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2009
10,190
12,624
113
Ames
This will just end up killing the NY6 bowl games. It also maintains the same rigged system to get into the ESPN Invitational.
 

MeanDean

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
Jan 5, 2009
14,632
20,880
113
Blue Grass IA-Jensen Beach FL
This actually makes me wonder if we might see more meaningful non-conference games with a larger field.

With 4, one loss can eliminate you and two definitely does. So there's somewhat of a disincentive to schedule up, particularly if you get plenty of respect from your conference schedule as-is. With 8\12, that potential loss hurts less.

I can see that thinking too.

I was thinking of the UNLV type games and the SEC games late against South Georgia and UAB. Those don't add any usable 'data points' to the season 99% of the time.

And early season games often get heavily discounted by the end of the season - which non-conference games are most of the time. We almost got into the 4 team playoff last year with a loss in the non-conference to Louisiana.

JMHO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclones500

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,811
26,827
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
I can see that thinking too.

I was thinking of the UNLV type games and the SEC games late against South Georgia and UAB. Those don't add any usable 'data points' to the season 99% of the time.

And early season games often get heavily discounted by the end of the season - which non-conference games are most of the time. We almost got into the 4 team playoff last year with a loss in the non-conference to Louisiana.

JMHO.

Agree. It could be as simple as dropping the FCS opponent. I wouldn't suggest a "ban," each school could do non-conference however it wants. But that'd be a convenient starting point.
 

CloneIce

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
37,768
21,149
113
I really think it wont matter. Most every year the top 1-4 teams will win it all. Same thing occurs in FCS.

It’s the journey that matters though, not the destination. Just like in March Madness. Yeah we got Baylor vs Gonzaga in the championship. No surprise there. But that didn’t diminish all the excitement of the previous rounds.
 

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,507
74,254
113
Ankeny
It’s the journey that matters though, not the destination. Just like in March Madness. Yeah we got Baylor vs Gonzaga in the championship. No surprise there. But that didn’t diminish all the excitement of the previous rounds.

It'll never happen for football because it'd take too long and too many games for players' bodies, but there's something magical about early march how technically almost every team is still alive for the national championship in early march if they go on a run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CloneIce

NWICY

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2012
35,489
31,636
113
It's 4 more teams then it needs to be, but whatever it'll be an improvement over 4 where the committee, spent way to much time trying to get The OSU in no matter what.
 

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,908
8,397
113
Overland Park
This will just end up killing the NY6 bowl games. It also maintains the same rigged system to get into the ESPN Invitational.

Wouldn’t it make the non-playoff NY6 games a lot bigger? Since they would all be playoff games now? Teams who normally don’t make the playoffs have a chance to prove it against other teams who also think they should have made the playoffs, then get their shot at said Top 4 if they win. Literally last year Florida had a bunch of guys sit out their NY6 game.

I really think there should be a limit to 2 teams per conference, with 3 as a rare possibility if losing a conference championship ends up dropping you below a same conference team who didn’t make the championship game for example.