Thamel: The lean towards a 12-team playoff

BigJCy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
24,947
21,796
113
Wonder if this would finally make Notre Dame join a conference? If I'm reading this right they could never be higher than a 5 seed and thus never get a bye if they stay an independent.
 

theshadow

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
19,975
19,636
113
Based on the new info, the 2019 setup would have been:

9 FLA at 8 WIS -- winner vs 1 LSU*
12 MEM* at 5 UGA -- winner vs 4 OKLA*
11 UTAH at 6 ORE* -- winner vs 3 CLEM*
10 PSU at 7 BAY -- winner vs 2 OHST*
 
  • Like
Reactions: CYTUTT

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,811
26,827
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com


I like pretty much all of this, but I think quarterfinal round should be at campus sites.

I realize it's set up as bowl sites because with 12 teams instead of 4, the "off-year" major bowls would have watered-down appeal.

Just seems like (as mentioned earlier in the thread), if teams advance that's a lot of bowl-site hopping for fans. Travel + expense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBHMagic

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,811
26,827
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
Wonder if this would finally make Notre Dame join a conference? If I'm reading this right they could never be higher than a 5 seed and thus never get a bye if they stay an independent.

Excellent question.

If I were to design it, I wouldn't guarantee the top 4 slots to the "auto bid" -- seed the tournament in exact order of the standings. You're still guaranteed a slot if you're a top 6 definitive league champion (which makes winning your league "matter") but it also values overall body of work (so "the regular season matters").

Many years, the top 4 auto-bids WOULD be 1-2-3-4, but "my plan" allows for outlier seasons.
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,811
26,827
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
I'm shocked they decided to go with 1st games at on school sites. SHOCKED. That is also the most awesome part of this expansion.
Nothing was going to be perfect but on campus games are just a home run IMO.

I'm almost as shocked there's a proposal to go straight to 12 this soon -- instead of incremental 6 or 8 -- I assumed it'd go to 6, stay that way for like a decade, then increase, or such.

Not saying this plan will get approved, or how many years it'll be to launch it, but that's for another day ...
 

BigJCy

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
24,947
21,796
113
Wonder if this would finally make Notre Dame join a conference? If I'm reading this right they could never be higher than a 5 seed and thus never get a bye if they stay an independent.
 

cyclones500

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2010
38,811
26,827
113
Michigan
basslakebeacon.com
It would depend on what preference is given to champs #5 and #6.

If the 4 highest-ranked conference champs get byes, that's:
1 Alabama
2 Clemson
3 Ohio State
4 Oklahoma

If all of the rest go in order:
12 CCU at 5 ND
11 IND at 6 A&M
10 ISU at 7 FLA
9 UGA at 8 CIN

But, if the #5 and #6 champs get a home game, you can either just flip H/V...
5 ND at 12 CCU

...or seed them as #5 and #6, and shuffle the rest down so the at-larges are all seeded #7-12:
12 IND at 5 CIN
11 ISU at 6 CCU
10 UGA at 7 ND
9 FLA at 8 A&M

However, I wouldn't use the data from 2020 as an exercise in prediction.

Good roundup.

Now that you've done the legwork :) ... Only change I would make, as I proposed in a previous post, I’d prefer seeding based strictly on ranking. Also, in my scenario, quarterfinal round is at campus sites, too, instead of bowls (I know that won’t happen, but what the heck).

If so, 2019 would be this - auto bids in parentheses - others at-large:

First round
Madison, Wis.
8. Wisconsin
9. Florida
Athens, Ga.
5. Georgia
12. Memphis (American)
Eugene, Ore.
6. Oregon (Pac-12)
11. Utah
Waco, Texas
7. Baylor
10. Penn State

Quarterfinal round
Baton Rouge, La.
1. LSU (SEC)
(8 vs 9 winner)
Norman, Okla.
4. Oklahoma (Big 12)
(5 vs 12 winner)
Clemson, S.C.
3. Clemson (ACC)
(6 vs 11 winner)
Columbus, Ohio
2. Ohio State (Big Ten)
(7 vs 10 winner)
 

theshadow

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2006
19,975
19,636
113
I'm almost as shocked there's a proposal to go straight to 12 this soon -- instead of incremental 6 or 8 -- I assumed it'd go to 6, stay that way for like a decade, then increase, or such.

We already have 12 teams, between the CFP and NY6 games. This just consolidates it, and effectively gets rid of the contingency agreements for a league's #2 team.

How would the previous CFP/NY6 participants have changed under the proposed setup?
2014: #11 Kansas State in; #12 Georgia Tech out
2015: #10 North Carolina and #11 TCU in; #12 Ole Miss and #16 Oklahoma State out
2016: #10 Colorado in; #14 Auburn out
2017: No change, top 12 all made it
2018: #12 Penn State in; #15 Texas out
2019: #11 Utah in; #24 Virginia out

All of the above teams that got bumped out only got in to an NY6 game in the first place from a contingency agreement.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,462
19,624
113
There are going to be some interesting, hardcore winter weather games played if this all pans out. Can only imagine the SEC starting to complain when they have to come north of the mason dixon line to play outdoors in late December.

It could help level the playing field when considering all the bowls are always in the south for them too. I think this effectively saves the Big 12 as well, because it would guarantee the champ in the playoff and they do not want to give that up.