Coronavirus Coronavirus: In-Iowa General Discussion (Not Limited)

Status
Not open for further replies.

clonechemist

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2007
1,817
2,233
113
40
Philadelphia
State of New York has pulled back completely from the antibody tests due to the tests not being able to accurately show whether the antibodies are from COVID 19 or a previous COVID infection (common cold) or whether the person even has sufficient antibodies to prevent reinfection down the road...

https://www.politico.com/states/new...ts-on-cuomos-hope-of-immunity-testing-1282219

It’s not accurate to say NY has ‘pulled back completely’ from antibody testing, it’s simply the case that they have stepped back from suggesting the antibody test could be useful for ‘guaranteeing’ that any particular *individual* is immune. I think that’s fair and it’s an important distinction. I can’t speak specifically to the NY antibody test (I haven’t reviewed specificity and sensitivity data for the NY test, not even sure if it’s been released), but the NY antibody testing on a *population level* seems to agree with other independent data such as local fatality #’s, so it’s probably pretty accurate and thus useful for assessing how widely the virus has spread in a given population.

Coming back to another point, it is still a good bet that having antibodies against covid 19 does confer at lest some immunity (there is lots of emerging data consistent with this). But there is a leap from saying ‘yeah, we know this specific antibody prevents coronavirus replication in a lab setting’ to using antibody test results to tell an individual ‘yeah, you’re definitely immune and should feel free to go about your life without any restrictions’. So when WHO and NY come out and say ‘there’s no evidence this antibody test will tell you you’re immune’, that just means that they don’t have enough data yet to provide medical advice. It does NOT mean that covid 19 is uniquely resistant to development of immunity (again, all emerging data I’ve seen suggests many/most people who recover will have some significant immunity).
 

DSMCy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 1, 2013
5,788
7,559
113
West Des Moines
Lifting restrictions won't get people out for large numbers of people. I don't think the 20-25% of people who want the restrictions lifted are going to make a huge economic impact. I'm curious - what occupation do you friends have that you expect a switch to flip and they can go back to full income on Friday?
This is terrible to say and very superficial, but have you seen pictures of the people protesting?
You think those people have money to spend once things open up?

I don't think this is much of a leap to assume the majority of us that are taking this serious are also the ones that are saving every penny.
 

Al_4_State

Moderator
Staff member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 27, 2006
32,443
28,797
113
40
Driftless Region
Visit site
100% accurate. Sure, there will be enough idiots that will drop their guard and go about their daily life but the majority of people will still be cautious. People actually believe that a switch is going to flip and business will thrive, which blows my mind.

Not to mention the effect of the lost income already. Even people who might want to go back to "normal" won't be financially able to do so. Which will in turn create more slow down.
 

Cat Stevens

Well-Known Member
Mar 7, 2017
10,786
7,856
113
55
I've seen a lot of people who I know tend to vote Republican being pissed at Reynolds.

Whether or not that translates to anything in two years is a different question. But she doesn't have the cult-like loyalty that Trump has.

that’s today. And it’s completely driven by economics. Don’t be surprised to see another fed farm bailout this summer.

In 2 years, the new normal will be accepted, and the driving forces will once again prevail.
 

NorthCyd

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 22, 2011
21,147
35,691
113
Approved because of a relaxing of regulations. Approved doesn't mean as much right now. Just look at how the market is being flooded with bad antibody tests. The fact is Utah has shown these tests look like they are producing a lot of false negatives.
The state lab is testing the effectiveness of the machines the tests run through and not the actual accuracy of the tests as far as I know.
I read that article about the tests in Utah and it is a long way from proving anything about those tests. There are plenty of reasons that could explain the discrepancy between positive tests that don't involve the tests being faulty. If memory serves there was something like a 2% difference. I would contend if that was due to the tests being faulty they would have to fail at such a high rate they wouldn't pass any quality assurance anywhere. The testing in India found the tests to be 100% accurate detecting people who had the virus.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,270
55,164
113
This is terrible to say and very superficial, but have you seen pictures of the people protesting?
You think those people have money to spend once things open up?

I don't think this is much of a leap to assume the majority of us that are taking this serious are also the ones that are saving every penny.

They had money to get to the protesting sites, they had money for their guns (at some point), they had money for all of their flags, posters and designer cammo and 'murica-themed clothing, they had money they want to continue donating only within the church walls.

So I can assume they're responsible enough financially to be able to support local businesses and tip the servers very, very well.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,270
55,164
113
It’s not accurate to say NY has ‘pulled back completely’ from antibody testing, it’s simply the case that they have stepped back from suggesting the antibody test could be useful for ‘guaranteeing’ that any particular *individual* is immune. I think that’s fair and it’s an important distinction. I can’t speak specifically to the NY antibody test (I haven’t reviewed specificity and sensitivity data for the NY test, not even sure if it’s been released), but the NY antibody testing on a *population level* seems to agree with other independent data such as local fatality #’s, so it’s probably pretty accurate and thus useful for assessing how widely the virus has spread in a given population.

Coming back to another point, it is still a good bet that having antibodies against covid 19 does confer at lest some immunity (there is lots of emerging data consistent with this). But there is a leap from saying ‘yeah, we know this specific antibody prevents coronavirus replication in a lab setting’ to using antibody test results to tell an individual ‘yeah, you’re definitely immune and should feel free to go about your life without any restrictions’. So when WHO and NY come out and say ‘there’s no evidence this antibody test will tell you you’re immune’, that just means that they don’t have enough data yet to provide medical advice. It does NOT mean that covid 19 is uniquely resistant to development of immunity (again, all emerging data I’ve seen suggests many/most people who recover will have some significant immunity).

If there weren't some form of immunity or protection, wouldn't confirmed cases be much higher as people continually got reinfected? Like, couldn't it then just keep recirculating around households and workplaces?
 

DeereClone

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2009
8,281
9,648
113
This is terrible to say and very superficial, but have you seen pictures of the people protesting?
You think those people have money to spend once things open up?

I don't think this is much of a leap to assume the majority of us that are taking this serious are also the ones that are saving every penny.

LOL. Most of my friends, family, and neighbors look like those folks and their average net worth would make most posters on this board look like peasants.
 

dahliaclone

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2007
16,174
24,992
113
Minneapolis
100% accurate. Sure, there will be enough idiots that will drop their guard and go about their daily life but the majority of people will still be cautious. People actually believe that a switch is going to flip and business will thrive, which blows my mind.

I keep telling people this and it doesn't stick with them...they don't get it. Blows my mind.
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
7,315
12,173
113
For the Workday thing I would be shocked if it is remotely on schedule. I know that the current implementation at DOT and Iowa State has gone horribly. I think at the end of the day something like it is long overdue but how they got there is really questionable.

I think you are correct in all of this, and "questionable" is putting it mildly. The state's entire relationship with Workday, or perhaps more specifically the people who facilitated it, are shady.
 

isufbcurt

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2006
27,526
44,483
113
46
Newton
I just drove by the Test Iowa site at Wells Fargo Arena and there were no one there getting tested. The workers all looked bored.
 

Urbandale2013

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2018
4,789
5,930
113
30
Urbandale
I think you are correct in all of this, and "questionable" is putting it mildly. The state's entire relationship with Workday, or perhaps more specifically the people who facilitated it, are shady.
I left it at questionable because I actually think there’s a decent possibility that Workday would have been the choice even if they did competitively bid it. Also my understanding is it wasn’t technically a no bid contract even if it really was.

That said you are right how they got there is shady as ****.
 

GrappleCy

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2018
566
912
63
I do wonder if this wee
100% accurate. Sure, there will be enough idiots that will drop their guard and go about their daily life but the majority of people will still be cautious. People actually believe that a switch is going to flip and business will thrive, which blows my mind.

I'm wondering what'll happen this coming weekend. Will more people decide to venture out to sit in restaurants and stuff? The same group of people? Or will fewer come out after getting the novelty out of the way and maybe deciding it isn't worth continuing for now?
 

CascadeClone

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2009
10,878
13,959
113
100% accurate. Sure, there will be enough idiots that will drop their guard and go about their daily life but the majority of people will still be cautious. People actually believe that a switch is going to flip and business will thrive, which blows my mind.

Beyond that, a lot of people have been financially damaged/scarred by this, and will basically give up to some extent.

Get ready for the new normal: 15% unemployment (higher among under 30s), combined with reduced GDP and soaring government debt. Read up on your Greek, Italian, and Spanish recent economic history, because that's where we are headed. The solutions are hard, and neither party has any interest in promoting or pursuing them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron