Some lady on the news was upset that Pence wasn’t wearing a mask and going on about it..............while standing outside the business without a mask.
Should be plenty of outrage on here.
You may be correct about the backside of the curve, but the upside was so accurate nationally that I'm waiting to see it pan out before claiming it's wrong. And if you recall I'm referencing that very first IHME forecast.The "backside" slope of their fitted curve was never reasonable - even when ignoring that any social distancing and restrictions would naturally be eased once it was perceived as being "past the peak". My biggest issue is their "uncertainty" area going to zero along with cases/deaths. That's just bad presentation.
Minnesota loosening things up next week.
We are delaying our late May fishing trip. Our county in Iowa has 1000 times more cases than the county we go to in Minnesota. The hospital situation in Northern Minnesota is not as good as here. Probably will try a fall trip.I’m going fishing up there
Should be plenty of outrage on here.
We are delaying our late May fishing trip. Our county in Iowa has 1000 times more cases than the county we go to in Minnesota. The hospital situation in Northern Minnesota is not as good as here. Probably will try a fall trip.
I am from the top tier of counties in Iowa. The county cases are anywhere from 1-3 in mine and most of the counties that I can recall in that line. The three counties on the MN side that would border mine and the adjoining Iowa counties all are in the 30s last I checked, I think one is into the 40s also. They have been at that level for awhile. Odd that a few miles makes that much difference.
State of New York has pulled back completely from the antibody tests due to the tests not being able to accurately show whether the antibodies are from COVID 19 or a previous COVID infection (common cold) or whether the person even has sufficient antibodies to prevent reinfection down the road...Finding out where immunity is would also help if antibody tests become more reliable and accessible. How many antibodies are needed for protection, for how long, etc.
I'm not sure how they study that--do people who've recovered volunteer to be infected again to see if there's protection?
This landlord is screwed
https://www.portlandmercury.com/blo...landlord-for-tracking-covid-19-stimulus-check
Reynolds is going to end up being one of the most unpopular governors in the country when this is all done.
State of New York has pulled back completely from the antibody tests due to the tests not being able to accurately show whether the antibodies are from COVID 19 or a previous COVID infection (common cold) or whether the person even has sufficient antibodies to prevent reinfection down the road...
https://www.politico.com/states/new...ts-on-cuomos-hope-of-immunity-testing-1282219
really? What would you do different?
Reynolds is going to end up being one of the most unpopular governors in the country when this is all done.
really? What would you do different?
really? What would you do different?
What part of the university testing capabilities are you talking about? SHL, which is part of the U of I, is running the tests. Did you want them to manufacture the tests as well? I could be wrong, but I don't think they have that capability. We were going to have to the buy tests somewhere.And she decided not to use the testing capability at our universities and instead outsource it to a startup from Utah with no track record on a no-bid contract at the suggestion of an actor.
What part of the university testing capabilities are you talking about? SHL, which is part of the U of I, is running the tests. Did you want them to manufacture the tests as well? I could be wrong, but I don't think they have that capability. We were going to have to the buy tests somewhere.
And everyone keeps bringing up no bid like its some kind of underhanded deal. There is no other option in this case unless you want to wait until the pandemic is over to respond. I doubt very much no bid means no oversight. I don't know for sure in this case, but every state contract I'm aware of has to get approval from some kind of board or commission. Maybe it is as simple as Kim whipping out her state of Iowa checkbook and cutting a check for millions, but I doubt it.
I posted a version of this yesterday - but I think it's clear.
Leaving the politics side out of it (there's much to critique there), she should lead by example and use data driven metrics to make decisions. She is either not doing this or not fully explaining the metrics for how decisions are being made. I would make very clear what data is being used to "shut down" and "open up" and realize that headlines and perception are the most important things. People need to be told that this is a dangerous disease and will be affecting our lives for a long time to come and clearly told and shown how we should all deal with it - being told we don't need to stay at home and that we just need to "live with it" is the wrong message in my opinion
And she has been entirely reactive in her response. There has been no apparent attempt to proactively cut off potential hot spots like meat packing plants and care facilities.
And she decided not to use the testing capability at our universities and instead outsource it to a startup from Utah with no track record on a no-bid contract at the suggestion of an actor.