Coronavirus Coronavirus: In-Iowa General Discussion (Not Limited)

Status
Not open for further replies.

ClonesTwenty1

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2018
17,803
21,820
113
Not going to shut down all non essential businesses yet because they're able to manage it so far.

Seriously? So you're going to wait until the situation gets out of hand before doing it? That's completely irresponsible governor.
Yup. All the medical experts have said this thing isn’t going to get any better without basically isolating everyone as much as possible. Why will no one listen to them?!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BigCyFan

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
33,325
39,359
113
Not going to shut down all non essential businesses yet because they're able to manage it so far.

Seriously? So you're going to wait until the situation gets out of hand before doing it? That's completely irresponsible governor.

I sort of understand her position. But it seems like we will be headed to a complete shutdown soon enough. The sooner we do it, the sooner it is over.
 

jdcyclone19

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2017
3,548
4,876
113
Iowa
Not going to shut down all non essential businesses yet because they're able to manage it so far.

Seriously? So you're going to wait until the situation gets out of hand before doing it? That's completely irresponsible governor.

Asking Iowans to stay home is not working. They have their heads in the sand if they think that’s actually happening. Especially with all the spring breakers coming back.
 

RealisticCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2014
1,692
2,710
113
Ames, IA
Yup. All the medical experts have said this thing isn’t going to get any better without basically isolating everyone as much as possible. Why will no one listen to them?!

$$$$$$$$$$$

Trying to balance the short and long term economic impact with the number of deaths. Not saying the decision is right or wrong, just trying to explain the decisions.
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
I see we are doing our regularly scheduled thing in the non political coronavirus thread where people with zero relevant information act like they are in a position to judge these obviously difficult decisions being made with respect to people's livelihoods.

Carry on.
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
7,315
12,173
113
I see we are doing our regularly scheduled thing in the non political coronavirus thread where people with zero relevant information act like they are in a position to judge these obviously difficult decisions being made with respect to people's livelihoods.

Carry on.

If this board had a "wanking motion" rating, this post would get it.
 

clonedude

Well-Known Member
Apr 16, 2006
33,027
29,265
113
I see we are doing our regularly scheduled thing in the non political coronavirus thread where people with zero relevant information act like they are in a position to judge these obviously difficult decisions being made with respect to people's livelihoods.

Carry on.

I just wonder why the state of Iowa can't afford to shut down all non-essential businesses, but Illinois can, among many other states.

California didn't wait until they couldn't manage it any longer, they were proactive. This governor wants to be reactive. That doesn't work in these situations.

Reynolds wanted to do the same thing with the schools initially. She didn't want to close a school down until they had a verified case at the school. She doesn't understand the science at all obviously on this matter.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: isufbcurt

RealisticCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2014
1,692
2,710
113
Ames, IA
Actual question: has any of Iowa's congressional reps said anything in the last two weeks? Not saying they should or shouldn't have, just legitimately wondering if our senators and representatives have commented on anything...
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
I just wonder why the state of Iowa can't afford to shut down all non-essential businesses, but Illinois can, among many other states.

California didn't wait until they couldn't manage it any longer, they were proactive. This governor wants to be reactive. That doesn't work in these situations.

Reynolds wanted to do the same thing with the schools initially. She didn't want to close a school down until they had a verified case at the school. She doesn't understand the science at all obviously on this matter.

California is on their third escalation of their shutdown status. First, schools, then service economy businesses like sit down restaurants, now a broader closure of non essential businesses. How is that different from what has happened in Iowa? It isn't.

And that is in a state with a much more widespread problem than we have here, by at least an order of magnitude.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.