This is a surprise to you?
Nah...it's just fun watching someone not get to the root of what they're saying.
Like that ISU25/jereis dude who kept making the 'Prohm/Hoiberg obsession' argument when it wasn't even mentioned as a thing.
This is a surprise to you?
Tuco is trying to tell us that missed goaltend is a normal occurrence.Please tell me we aren't still talking about the officiating in a game we lost by 20.
That's childish. I dont keep a notebook by my couch writing down lists of grievances. I leave that to you guys.I'm not talking about general missed calls.
Tell me what specific games that you've seen a defender foul an offensive player, then hang on the rim, and then not get called for the goal tend.
Otherwise you're just making **** up.
I 100% agree with this statement. It allows less physical teams to get away with a disproportionate amount of fouls. As a fan of a very physical team, it results in an artificial leveling of the playing field.Refs miss calls in every game. They miss them against ISU and against the team ISU plays. I think the real problem is that the refs have let way too much physical contact go this year. Freedom of movement is dead this year.
Agree that it was a bad miss. I dont recall if the refs made any effort to "make up for it" by calling a ticky tack foul afterwards or not. But make up calls absolutely get made all the time.Tuco is trying to tell us that missed goaltend is a normal occurrence.
That was one of the worst no-calls I've ever seen. It was obvious at full speed to everyone watching, including the announcers on TV mentioning it in real time.
It didn't change the game much, no, but it was still absolutely pathetic. And is certainly not an everyday occurrence in many games. That's a braindead defense.
That folks are still whining about the refs in a 20 point drubbing is classic ISU.Classic Tuco.
That folks are still whining about the refs in a 20 point drubbing is classic ISU.
That's childish. I dont keep a notebook by my couch writing down lists of grievances. I leave that to you guys.
Ever seen a player jump up to block a shot and have his hand go through the net but not have it called? Yes, I have seen it multiple times. And I am sure that you have as well. I am also sure that you could probably only name the times where it was done by a Kansas player vs. Iowa State. It's part of your persecution complex.
That folks are still whining about the refs in a 20 point drubbing is classic ISU.
Eh, I have stated that it was a bad call probably five times already. My argument is that there is no greater conspiracy to give KU that call. It's just a missed call like it is in other games, no more.actually, people are just telling you you’re a dumb ****.
you could actually just be honest, and say hey it was a bad call. Instead you try to obfuscate with walls of words.
there’s a reason your boys always lose in the tournament
Always? Maybe fresh off 2 Elite Eights and a Final Four in 4 years isn't the time to talk about KU "always " losing early in the tourney.actually, people are just telling you you’re a dumb ****.
you could actually just be honest, and say hey it was a bad call. Instead you try to obfuscate with walls of words.
there’s a reason your boys always lose in the tournament
Always one of my favorites...
What does it say about someone who infests the forums of a rival team to make sure nobody talks mean about "his" pet basketball team?Exactly. I swear that ISU fans get a list of these at birth and links to the youtube videos. The dead ball three, the Niang/EJ foul and the Young/Withey foul switch.
Never seen a fan base that thinks the world is out to screw them like the ISU fan base. Truly unique.
Never seen a fan base that thinks the world is out to screw them like the ISU fan base. Truly unique.
That’s ridiculous. Freedom of movement was created to level the playing field. To allow shooters rather than solely physical players to thrive. West Virginia and Kansas benefit the most by freedom of movement being limited.I 100% agree with this statement. It allows less physical teams to get away with a disproportionate amount of fouls. As a fan of a very physical team, it results in an artificial leveling of the playing field.
Exactly. I swear that ISU fans get a list of these at birth and links to the youtube videos. The dead ball three, the Niang/EJ foul and the Young/Withey foul switch.
Never seen a fan base that thinks the world is out to screw them like the ISU fan base. Truly unique.
Not sure where you came up with that but it is not accurate. It was created to allow better offensive players the ability to achieve their potential, thus making the game "more appealing to watch (aka higher scoring). The better teams have better player who, when not clutched and grabbed, would in theory achieve better results.That’s ridiculous. Freedom of movement was created to level the playing field. To allow shooters rather than solely physical players to thrive. West Virginia and Kansas benefit the most by freedom of movement being limited.
My apologizes. There is so much anti Prohm sentiment on here that I just assumed you were part of the “I hate Prohm and refuse to give him credit for anything he does well, while holding him to a standard higher than any previous clone coach” crowd.Obviously you either haven't been reading this site much lately and know my position with Prohm.....or don't recognize sarcasm. Because I was laying it on real thick with that post.