Because Stanley, while not the best QB at Iowa, found a way to win when it mattered. Purdy does not do that yet. He still has time.
So Stanley was the reason Iowa beat Nebraska. Lol OK
Because Stanley, while not the best QB at Iowa, found a way to win when it mattered. Purdy does not do that yet. He still has time.
So Stanley was the reason Iowa beat Nebraska. Lol OK
The QB's have an inordinate influence on a game, but aren't the sole reason's for Wins and losses.
Yep. Life of playing the 4th hardest schedule in the entire country
Not according to 4 of the 6 reputable metrics. That is pretty bad though, if you are going to not even care about 3 games, you'd probably better win more than 5 games against the teams you do care about. Heck Kirk Ferentz went 1-0 in the games he cared about.
In all honesty it's pretty unfair to Nate Stanley to credit those wins to Kirk Ferentz instead of him
Coaches have to carry around all wins and losses, no matter if it is a punt return team blunder, or a QB fumble that causes a loss.
So is Stanley winning games or Ferentz?
Congrats! What does he win?
Honest question since you are rational. Will Purdy go down as the greatest QB in the state of Iowa's history when it's all said and done? It will come down to him or Chuck I assume
If you aint first you're lastSecond team All Conference award I guess
If you aint first you're last
Yet.....7-6
At least he got his yards