S.I.: Wichita State to AAC, early as 2017-18

carvers4math

Well-Known Member
Mar 15, 2012
20,441
16,137
113
Wichita is rumored to be getting 60% of what the full member's get to make up for not having football.

Son in Wichita has said there have been rumors about this for a while, as well as the possibility of adding football again at WSU, although he thinks their stadium is pretty small. Guessing they could get some corporate sponsor to cough up some money if they wanted to go that route though. They would have much better basketball competition though.
 

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
21,796
22,774
113
Gotta think the ADs office is pushing to get them on TV anymore. Need some additional revenue to help with that massive contract.
 

Cyballzz

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2010
3,184
2,861
113
Move to where? UNI is not going anywhere.

Exactly. A Move to the MAC sounds like a fine plan for UNI but what does the MAC actually gain by adding them?

If you are going to divide an already meager pie even further you damn well better add some value ($$$$) to the conference.
 

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
14,446
10,403
113
35
Dubuque
As a UNI alum (but Cyclone fan first!) I'd be thrilled to see them join the MAC. But unless the school has fallen into some money that I haven't heard about it, I don't know how it would be possible.

Hard to see what the MAC could stand to gain from it, a footprint into Iowa recruiting perhaps? Not that there's a hot bed of talent, but certainly there are MAC-level athletes all across the state.

UNI could move up to FBS football, which I think would help with the attendance issues. FBS is way more interesting than FCS (duh) I think I went to just two football games (both homecoming) in 3 years of being a student there, and one I left at halftime because it just didn't interest me a whole lot. Think of the fact, too, that when they beat ISU as they occasionally do, we aren't losing to a freaking FCS school at least....not that losing to a MAC school makes you feel that much better.
 

FarminCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 14, 2009
4,437
2,449
113
Nowhere and Everywhere
This could begin a mid-major domino-effect, if NDSU/SDSU reach for The Valley. As much as P5 football-driven realignment annoys me, the musical-chairs team-shift in D-1 bball sometimes fascinates me.

My friend/fellow ISU fan in Fargo said UND is on a push to move from Big Sky to Summit. So, if ND State and SD State both moved to MVC, and UND landed in Summit, who fills the Big Sky vacancy?

UND is already headed to Summit. It was announced awhile ago. UND's hockey program is by far the biggest program in the state and will be the biggest program in that conference even though Summit doesn't host hockey. Their hockey program brings in money.
 

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
9,357
9,145
113
39
Tough blow for the Valley. I really like that conference and hate to see it shredded. Regardless, in my mind, they 100% need to add NDSU to replace them. It was stupid they didn't last time and went with Loyala instead. Also, I'd almost go out and say that this makes UNI the headliner team of the conference now.
It's a tough blow for the Valley but a good move for all the teams in the Valley imo. It was already effectively a 1-bid league to anyone other than WSU. Now instead of needing to beat WSU in the MVC tournament to get an invitation they just need to beat each other.
 

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,252
4,479
113
It's a tough blow for the Valley but a good move for all the teams in the Valley imo. It was already effectively a 1-bid league to anyone other than WSU. Now instead of needing to beat WSU in the MVC tournament to get an invitation they just need to beat each other.

It is not good for the Valley, it is awful for the Valley. The Valley drops from one of the best-of-the-rest conferences to a run of the mill mid- to low-major now. This will cost all of their schools money and exposure. I would doubt CBS will continue to show the Arch Madness final when that contract comes back up.
 

cygrads

Well-Known Member
Jul 27, 2007
4,969
2,727
113
Altoona, IA
Am I the only one that thinks WSU probably won't do that much better (seeding wise) than what they have gotten? Instead of having a gaudy record with only 2 or 3 losses in the MVC they will probably have 6 or 8 losses which will put them round the same seeding they have always gotten. Should be interesting to see how this works out.
 

LLCoolCY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 28, 2010
9,766
15,732
113
Minneapolis
It would be terrible blow for the MVC to lose their only national program. That said it could easily be a positive for UNI and Drake IMO. Currently WSU is so dominate in the conference it is essentially a one bid league, due to the money and recruiting advantage they have over the rest of the league. They are/were set up to be the only relevant program for the next decade.
Them moving would allow for the instate schools to build and realistically fight for the NCAA bid and exposure. Someone would need to take over the crown may as well be UNI or Drake..
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FinalFourCy

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
9,357
9,145
113
39
It is not good for the Valley, it is awful for the Valley. The Valley drops from one of the best-of-the-rest conferences to a run of the mill mid- to low-major now. This will cost all of their schools money and exposure. I would doubt CBS will continue to show the Arch Madness final when that contract comes back up.
They were already run of the mill. That's why WSU jumped to the best of the rest.

Bad for the conference, good for the teams in the conference. The MVC was already a wasteland. Nothing is better for those type programs than consistently getting to the tournament.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 21, 2009
15,520
12,685
113
44
Way up there
Baring a $100 million donation to UNI, I don't see anyway they can go FBS. Plus the MAC doesn't exactly need UNI. The MAC tried expanding with UMass a few years ago and it was a disaster. Since then, they kicked UMass out and went back to 12 teams. If the MAC doesn't want UMass, they sure as **** don't want UNI.

The only thing UNI would have on UMASS is UMASS wasn't a full member, I think they were a football only member due to being so far off the MAC footprint. UNI would bring all sports and at least borders a state already in the leagues footprint. I think the move would be a ways down the line but UNI would be a better fit IMO. UMASS was a half assed member, who didn't even bring the best programs to the MAC. UNI would be all in and has programs that would compete from day one.
 

CyForPresident

Well-Known Member
Mar 28, 2006
8,335
3,138
113
37
Cornlands of Ayuxwa
The only thing UNI would have on UMASS is UMASS wasn't a full member, I think they were a football only member due to being so far off the MAC footprint. UNI would bring all sports and at least borders a state already in the leagues footprint. I think the move would be a ways down the line but UNI would be a better fit IMO. UMASS was a half assed member, who didn't even bring the best programs to the MAC. UNI would be all in and has programs that would compete from day one.

Fair enough, but there is no way the MAC wants UNI. That is a Michigan/Ohio conference (9 teams in those 2 states)
 

DesMoinesCy

Active Member
Oct 10, 2012
203
79
28
Des Moines
Think of the fact, too, that when they beat ISU as they occasionally do, we aren't losing to a freaking FCS school at least....not that losing to a MAC school makes you feel that much better.
Losing to a MAC school looks a lot better perception-wise than losing to a FCS school, even though the Top 10 or FCS schools are better than some of the lower-division MAC teams.