demoncore1031
Well-Known Member
I knew he was announcing the day before signing day, but I got my days mixed up. Working graveyard shift throws me off sometimes.I'm just going off the 247 countdown clocks
I knew he was announcing the day before signing day, but I got my days mixed up. Working graveyard shift throws me off sometimes.I'm just going off the 247 countdown clocks
They give extra credit points. for players ranked really high.Jones moves average player rating up to 50. Interesting Rutgers has same # of commits and lower average rating than ISU but is higher in the total.
If I had to rank remaining prospects left and likelihood of choosing ISU:
1. Milton
2. Lubin
3. Onyemaobi
4. Cumberlander
5. Munford (only because there really isn't anyone else)
Maybe a flip by a player already committed, but I think we're basically looking at 1-3 on my list.
Put this guy as warm because of his final 4, new name.
Why not?I don't think ISU is really an option for him. I'd be chocked if he doesn't choose Indiana.
Why not?
I was looking at RB depth on the scholarship chart, it is lighter than I thought, only 4 scholarship RBs......
which we have filled that need pretty well with this class, I can't imagine we would turn an athlete away when we are that light on the scholarship chart in this position.... Lets imagine worst case, we hit the injury bug like Iowa a couple years ago when they were injured through the top 4, would you want Nick Leach or Mensah being your primary ball carriers?Because it's been reported for awhile that ISU would not take a RB in this class and instead use that scholarship for an offensive or defensive line.
which we have filled that need pretty well with this class, I can't imagine we would turn an athlete away when we are that light on the scholarship chart in this position.... Lets imagine worst case, we hit the injury bug like Iowa a couple years ago when they were injured through the top 4, would you want Nick Leach or Mensah being your primary ball carriers?