COACHING SEARCH: Campbell up, Fleck down

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,502
74,237
113
Ankeny
I totally agree with this. What do you have to lose?

Despite our record, i dont think we're all that far from at least mediocrity. The past few years we've just been a few plays from being a bowl team, and this year were pretty competitive against Iowa, OSU, TCU, and KSU. Pretty easy to fall farther from that to not being competitive at all, when we really just need the next step. Get that next step and then take advantage on the recruiting side and then things can improve.
 

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
Cyclone Fanatic is a pretty risk-averse bunch. When you haven't sniffed the top of the conference ever, I'd take a higher variance coach. Sometimes, there's a fine line between high-variance and unqualified, but I am a little confused by the hate for Fleck.

It isn't Fleck hate at all. Obviously the guy would bring in a better quality football recruit. His oddities notwithstanding, Fleck has won just four games against teams with winning records in three years. If Jamie is willing to spend the money to make the right choice, Fleck seems like more of a fallback option.
 

cygrads

Well-Known Member
Jul 27, 2007
4,969
2,728
113
Altoona, IA
Been there, doing that as we speak. We've perfected lost years and now we're cutting multi-million dollar checks to say babye.

Exactly, time to break the cycle. People think its time to take a risk and what they don't realize is we have been taking risks with every hire - time to examine each candidate and hire the one with the best experience and reduce the amount of risk for once.
 

D UP Clones

Well-Known Member
Oct 25, 2006
1,447
48
48
Fritz is out of the running then?

Campbell would make sense from a religious point of view. I believe he got into a bit of trouble at Toledo for talking religion too much with his players or something? Not saying he wouldn't be a good choice because I think he could be really good, I'm just saying he definitely fits the JP mold, that's for sure.


Chizik 2.0.

That's what I would expect from campbell. My goodness please tell me we get someone who understands.
 

cc1091

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2007
1,146
305
83
Minneapolis
Everyone needs to remember that ALL this info should be "taken for what it's worth". Just enjoy the rumblings until our new guy is hired.

As a guy who is not impressed by the vast majority of names in the lists I've heard, I think THIS is the best bit of info on this thread.
 

Rogue52

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 20, 2006
8,968
3,606
113
Cedar Rapids, IA
Out of curiosity, how much can be put into these updates of "one candidate up, one down"? I assume this is JP speaking to a donor to CW.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,625
23,880
113
Macomb, MI
Chizik 2.0.

That's what I would expect from campbell. My goodness please tell me we get someone who understands.

So you're saying Chizik was a failure because he was a Christian - get a grip. Chizik was a failure because he was a poor football coach - which became evident when Malzahn quit being his OC to become a head coach and he sunk that program.

I couldn't care less whether our next coach is a born-again Christian or a Pastafarian - just win.
 

WastedTalent

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2012
7,195
4,425
113
40
Coaching searches are exciting, but I can't stand the random clueless posters that only come around at big times like these, and proclaim the most absurd opinions.

I do appreciate the daily updates from CW, and other posters that actually have creditable info.
 

Jer

CF Founder, Creator
Feb 28, 2006
23,580
23,427
10,030
I think there is a difference between being risk adverse and just plain not liking a particular person. When you talk to donors, they like the idea of Fleck but don't like Fleck himself. As one donor put it "he may be the shiny new toy, but he comes across as an arrogant ****** both on the field and off, from what I've seen and heard and would have a very short shelf life".

Ive heard more than one person compare him to Kiffin 2.0, fwiw.

Personally, I would tend to share some of those opinions, though maybe not to the extreme. I think he may be a good coach but I don't think he'd fit well here for many reasons. You don't need to take the least proven or most odd to make a case for the highest risk/reward.
 

Rhoadhoused

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2010
11,211
245
63
34
Ames, IA
I think there is a difference between being risk adverse and just plain not liking a particular person. When you talk to donors, they like the idea of Fleck but don't like Fleck himself. As one donor put it "he may be the shiny new toy, but he comes across as an arrogant ****** both on the field and off, from what I've seen and heard and would have a very short shelf life".

Ive heard more than one person compare him to Kiffin 2.0, fwiw.

Personally, I would tend to share some of those opinions, though maybe not to the extreme. I think he may be a good coach but I don't think he'd fit well here for many reasons. You don't need to take the least proven or most odd to make a case for the highest risk/reward.

The highest reward part is that he's by far the best recruiter of the bunch, and has a history of stealing recruits from B10 teams at Western freaking Michigan, which is what we would need.

And how many boosters have actually met the guy?