I'm assuming some others like me are coping by simply following non-ISU football and kind of pretending yesterday didn't happen.
Some #s using today's sagarin vs the CFP Big Ten Selection Committee, notice how Baylor's "HORRIBLE" schedule is now a typical Ohio State or Iowa schedule and every other Big 12 team is playing better competition even according to the CFP's own SOS ranking. Ohio State should be 10th like Baylor is now in the next CFP since they are 0-1 against good teams and have been playing close with lots of bad ones as opposed to Baylor who has curb stomped the weaklings.
Oklahoma Sagarin: 2 (32 SOS)
Oklahoma BigTen Committee: 7 (34 SOS)
Baylor Sagarin: 4 (65 SOS)
Baylor BigTen Committee: 10 (62 SOS)
TCU Sagarin: 8 (44 SOS)
TCU BigTen Committee: 18 (45 SOS) (about to fall as insane as that is)
Ohio State Sagarin: 5 (61 SOS)
Ohio State BigTen Committee: 3 (58 SOS)
Iowa Sagarin: 17 (62 SOS)
Iowa BigTen Committee: 5 (67 SOS)
Michigan State Sagarin: 15 (48 SOS) (up to the minute)
Michigan State BigTen Committee: 9 (50 SOS) (about to rise)
NW Sagarin: 34 (31 SOS) (up to the minute)
NW BigTen Committee: 20 (40 SOS) (about to move up)
That is some staggeringly consistent 100% upward movement vs a computer for one conference and 100% downward movement from computer for another. I'll agree that the truth could very will be somewhere in between, but there's simply no way that Sagarin is overvaluing every single Big 12 team and undervaluing every single Big Ten team.
Some #s using today's sagarin vs the CFP Big Ten Selection Committee, notice how Baylor's "HORRIBLE" schedule is now a typical Ohio State or Iowa schedule and every other Big 12 team is playing better competition even according to the CFP's own SOS ranking. Ohio State should be 10th like Baylor is now in the next CFP since they are 0-1 against good teams and have been playing close with lots of bad ones as opposed to Baylor who has curb stomped the weaklings.
Oklahoma Sagarin: 2 (32 SOS)
Oklahoma BigTen Committee: 7 (34 SOS)
Baylor Sagarin: 4 (65 SOS)
Baylor BigTen Committee: 10 (62 SOS)
TCU Sagarin: 8 (44 SOS)
TCU BigTen Committee: 18 (45 SOS) (about to fall as insane as that is)
Ohio State Sagarin: 5 (61 SOS)
Ohio State BigTen Committee: 3 (58 SOS)
Iowa Sagarin: 17 (62 SOS)
Iowa BigTen Committee: 5 (67 SOS)
Michigan State Sagarin: 15 (48 SOS) (up to the minute)
Michigan State BigTen Committee: 9 (50 SOS) (about to rise)
NW Sagarin: 34 (31 SOS) (up to the minute)
NW BigTen Committee: 20 (40 SOS) (about to move up)
That is some staggeringly consistent 100% upward movement vs a computer for one conference and 100% downward movement from computer for another. I'll agree that the truth could very will be somewhere in between, but there's simply no way that Sagarin is overvaluing every single Big 12 team and undervaluing every single Big Ten team.