LOL.....is this a serious question? Yeah, there have been some former disgruntled employees who have given us big stories, and there have been just as many if not more that have come forward with stories that were complete b.s. To me, personally, I have a hard time really trusting a story when none of the sources are named, none will go on record with their comments being quoted, and the writer (and apparently many readers) just seem to accept what the writer presents as facts. Plus, the writer barely even attempts to present the other side of the story, or what information he did gather from the other side in his article.
For all anyone knows.......Hines could very easily have made up every single "source". Can you guarantee that he didn't? Like I said before, everything he wrote was based on hearsay.....with virtually no factual information. The whole damn story is written from an "I heard" perspective.
Maybe you and others are naive enough to just accept it even though it has been refuted by the two principal parties named in the story (although of course their side is never presented) and parts of it have now been proven to be incorrect, but I need a little more proof if I am going to believe this writer on this story, or anything else he writes from this point on.