New Riot Buster?

RubyClone

Active Member
Mar 21, 2014
3,110
17
38
I think it is completely ridiculous to militarize our domestic police force.

Agreed. If this thing ever shows up anywhere short of a sniper situation......

At least it was free. Of course, I'm sure the upkeep is ridiculous.
 

Stewo

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2008
16,856
14,812
113
Iowa
I called bull **** as soon as I heard them say that they needed it. Uhh, no, you don't need a vehicle in Ames, Iowa that can withstand massive IED blasts, RPG's and small arms fire. Is it cool to have? **** yes it is, but it's not a necessity.
 

EYEoftheSTORM

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 3, 2009
3,073
446
83
34
Ames, Iowa
Preparation for the upcoming zombie outbreak stemming from an incident at the USDA building on 13th St.? Seems like a good expense to me...
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
22,100
17,867
113
I think it is completely ridiculous to militarize our domestic police force.

But the recent trend of citizens wanting military style weapons is not ridiculous? As long as citizens are allowed to carry assault weapons, the police will need equipment like this to protect themselves from those weapons.
 

Acylum

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2006
12,903
13,309
113
I think it is completely ridiculous to militarize our domestic police force.

Somewhat agree.

But the recent trend of citizens wanting military style weapons is not ridiculous? As long as citizens are allowed to carry assault weapons, the police will need equipment like this to protect themselves from those weapons.

Somewhat agree.

Puts me smack-dab in the middle on this issue I guess. :confused:
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
41,087
29,242
113
But the recent trend of citizens wanting military style weapons is not ridiculous? As long as citizens are allowed to carry assault weapons, the police will need equipment like this to protect themselves from those weapons.

I agree with this point, but think it's more indicative that military grade arms and ordinance shouldn't be in the hands of anyone, police force included.
 

Rhoadhoused

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2010
11,211
245
63
32
Ames, IA
Just to be clear that article didn't mention the word "riot" once. They said it was for shootout/gunman type situations.
 

Wesley

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
70,923
546
113
Omaha
But the recent trend of citizens wanting military style weapons is not ridiculous? As long as citizens are allowed to carry assault weapons, the police will need equipment like this to protect themselves from those weapons.
The Homeland Security (i. e. Overloads) recently bought a billion bullets and thousands of armadillo buster vehicles just for occasions like VEISHA to try them out for training purposes.
 

RubyClone

Active Member
Mar 21, 2014
3,110
17
38
Well, free now that we all paid for it.

True, but I have no problem with paying for it for the military to use. In fact, what I recall seeing on the news during the height of the Iraq war - with our soldiers getting IED'd constantly - I'm ticked we didn't pay for more of them.

I suppose that leads to an interesting question. Why is this no longer serviceable for the military, yet functional enough it can be given away to a police force with a population of about 100K in Iowa?
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron