With our front court next year being so thin...How does everybody feel about moving WJ back to the 4 spot? Just curious.
You can call Wes whatever number... he will still shoot outside.. play as a wing...
He can guard different types of players... So it really doesnt matter what 'position he is' right?
I mean it's not like he would go to being a low post scorer. Not with his ability.
I think we'll see him at the 3 / 4 next year, rather than the 2 / 3 he is playing this year. He is a better rebounder than Brackins, and we'll need him to be in better position to rebound next year with Clark and Jiri gone.
I would not be suprised at all to see DG at the point and Buckley at SG. I know Buckley has been playing SG this year, you think maybe he suggested that knowing where we wanted him? If he is a better shooter than DG then I think this would be a great move based on Garrett's ability to drive and dish...
Buckley will be at the point...guaranteed. Maybe a backup to Appleton if we get him, but at the point non the less. Point is why he was recruited. Only switched on his high school team because they needed points.
Buckley will be at the point...guaranteed. Maybe a backup to Appleton if we get him, but at the point non the less. Point is why he was recruited. Only switched on his high school team because they needed points.
You can call Wes whatever number... he will still shoot outside.. play as a wing...
He can guard different types of players... So it really doesnt matter what 'position he is' right?
I mean it's not like he would go to being a low post scorer. Not with his ability.
I think position labels are a waste of time.
Buckley will be at the point...guaranteed. Maybe a backup to Appleton if we get him, but at the point non the less. Point is why he was recruited. Only switched on his high school team because they needed points.
Why couldn't Garrett and Buckley be on the floor at the same time? You can never have too many ballhandlers.