From what I saw of them in our game, they're still too streaky to say they go too far. I'll give them still the the Sweet 16m then the 3's etc. run out and a quality team can put a defender on Beasley and sends them home. Good team though.
Is Beasly another on those one and done players just to reach the requirements of teh NBA?
I'm an definately not a huge fan of this rule now. Its completely unfair for the other players who work hard all 4 years.Um, yeah. I think that was "decided" the second he hit campus. His play is just moving him up higher on the food chain.
I'm an definately not a huge fan of this rule now. Its completely unfair for the other players who work hard all 4 years.
Just let them go Pro and showboat all they want. I don't need to be rewarded by the NCAA to see it for one year in college.
I guess I look at it in the respect of building a team and not a one man show. When a player is solely coming in for one year and then gone, this builds nothing. I like the story of dynasties. Get dominate teams for mulitple years instead of just one. I really think its changing the way of college basketball. Plus it takes scholarships away. Maybe not from someone who really needs it, but then again maybe it does.
Difference of opinion I guess.
I would take Beasley or Durant for one year over not at all, 1000 times over.
If a kid deserves a scholarship he'll get it somewhere. Dynasties are pretty much a thing of the past anyway - it really doesn't happen anymore. Great players win games and so they try to get the best players regardless of how long they stay. If Brackins improves a ton next year and goes pro, does that mean it was a mistake to recruit him? No way.
Stuff like Florida winning it 2 years in a row just doesn't happen anymore because 99% of those guys all go pro after they win the first one.
If Walker keeps playing this well, he's probably gone after this year too.