NFL Votes to Change Rules for Kickoffs

Cyballz

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2009
1,214
818
113
not a surprise the teams wanted this. Less returns = less injuries and less guys like Cribbs and Hester that command a big salary for mostly returning kicks.
 

RING4CY

Well-Known Member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2010
8,582
1,417
113
Ames, IA
not a surprise the teams wanted this. Less returns = less injuries and less guys like Cribbs and Hester that command a big salary for mostly returning kicks.
Hester is mainly a punt returner anyways.
 

hawkeyeh8r

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2010
2,159
46
48
35
Ames
**** you goddell. he's a power hungry mother****er. i cant wait to see him finally leave, he has ruined the game in more ways than one. first having the pro bowl before the super bowl and now kicking off from the 35. this must be there way of trying to justify adding 2 extra regular season games
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
41,117
29,329
113
**** you goddell. he's a power hungry mother****er. i cant wait to see him finally leave, he has ruined the game in more ways than one. first having the pro bowl before the super bowl and now kicking off from the 35. this must be there way of trying to justify adding 2 extra regular season games

I don't like Goodell any more than the next guy, but you can't blame him for something that wasn't his decision. This had to be approved by the owners. Goodell couldn't just decree that these rule changes were going to happen, and I haven't seen any evidence that these kickoff changes were even his idea. The team owners own the game. They can make whatever rule changes they want.

What I do think is funny is that it hasn't been all hat long since kickoffs were on the 35. I think the rule change to put them at the 30 came in the late 80's or early 90's.
 

RING4CY

Well-Known Member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2010
8,582
1,417
113
Ames, IA
I don't like Goodell any more than the next guy, but you can't blame him for something that wasn't his decision. This had to be approved by the owners. Goodell couldn't just decree that these rule changes were going to happen, and I haven't seen any evidence that these kickoff changes were even his idea. The team owners own the game. They can make whatever rule changes they want.

What I do think is funny is that it hasn't been all hat long since kickoffs were on the 35. I think the rule change to put them at the 30 came in the late 80's or early 90's.
1994. The same year the 2-point conversion was introduced.
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
41,117
29,329
113
I'm a walking NFL encyclopedia. :smile:

Not going to argue with that. My point is that hawkeyeh8r's anger toward goodell is misplaced, in this instance. And the notion, that it is some kind of attempt to secure an 18 game season doesn't have a lot of merit either.

And while Billy Cundiff had about a 50% touchback percentage, the rest of the league averaged about 15%, so it's not like everyone was kicking it out of the park. Teams averaged less than 1 touchback per game in 2010. So, yeah five extra yards is going net some more touchbacks. Guys like Billy Cundiff are going to have gaudy stats as a result, but it's not like every kickoff is going to be sailing out of the endzone.
 

Mr Janny

Welcome to the Office of Secret Intelligence
Staff member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
Mar 27, 2006
41,117
29,329
113
Here's another good stat. The average kickoff last season landed at the 6.5-yard line. Again, I'm not saying I'm in favor of the new rule change, I just don't think it's going to result in a statistically huge increase in the number of touchbacks.
 

CYdTracked

Well-Known Member
Mar 23, 2006
17,021
7,731
113
Grimes, IA
They discussed this on Mike & Mike this morning and one of the things brought up was some teams might start using "mortar kicks" which are high short kickoffs that will fall shy of the goal line. Those types of kicks could be even more dangerous because there will be more hang time with a shorter field for the gunners to get down and hit the return man and teams would have to field those kicks else risk the kickoff team recovering it before it would become a touch back.

Don't like this rule change at all and I'm sure the elite kickoff return guys aren't happy with it either.
 

jbhtexas

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2006
14,128
4,083
113
Arlington, TX
They discussed this on Mike & Mike this morning and one of the things brought up was some teams might start using "mortar kicks" which are high short kickoffs that will fall shy of the goal line. Those types of kicks could be even more dangerous because there will be more hang time with a shorter field for the gunners to get down and hit the return man and teams would have to field those kicks else risk the kickoff team recovering it before it would become a touch back.

I'm not so sure I buy this. I don't recall these "mortar kicks" being used back before the kickoff was moved to the 30 in 1994. If there was some advantage to this, wouldn't kickers have been doing this pre-1994 instead of just booting the ball into the endzone?

Don't like this rule change at all and I'm sure the elite kickoff return guys aren't happy with it either.

The need for their position was eliminated/diminished by corporate big-wigs...welcome to the world the rest of us live in...
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
59,506
21,024
113
Macomb, MI
I'm not so sure I buy this. I don't recall these "mortar kicks" being used back before the kickoff was moved to the 30 in 1994. If there was some advantage to this, wouldn't kickers have been doing this pre-1994 instead of just booting the ball into the endzone?

(note- I have the argument in my head, I may botch it putting it down in words)

Kickers also didn't have "the leg" that back then that a lot of kickers have today. The whole reason why the kickoff was moved back to the 30 yard line in 1994 was because there were too many touchbacks. If they were to "mortar" a kick back then, the returner would likely field the ball at the 5-10 yard line and easily get past the 20 - statistical advantage to kick a line drive and put it into/through the end zone. Move the ball back 5 yards - if you kick a line drive kick into the end zone your coverage has no chance to get down the field, so even a kick that goes 5 yards deep into the end zone has a chance to be returned to the 25-30.

With stronger legs, a kicker can "mortar" a kick and get it to fall between the 5 yard line and the goal line - much harder to advance it past the 20 yard line, especially since the wedge has been outlawed.
 

besserheimerphat

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
10,331
12,638
113
Mount Vernon, WA
The kickoff is kind of a weird concept in sports. What other sport gives a team the opportunity to score while playing neither offense or defense? It's like giving a baseball team 3 pitches to get a guy on base before starting to count outs. Or giving a basketball team a free shot from half court after each basket. I couldn't care less if they just eliminated the kickoff all together and gave them the ball on the 20.