HN IOWA vs ISU Simulation

[superdorf]

Scout.com: Iowa/ISU: Simulation Results

Apparently Bueker is gonna be our QB tomorrow... And we lose 16-14. Money gets a TD from Bueker and Smith returns an INT for a touchdown.

Seems likely!

 

[tman24]

Looks like we never get in field goal range except for the 4th quarter that really makes sense

 

[CycloneJoe]

28 passes closer to 45

Iowa will never be ahead!

21-17 Cyclones lead wire to wire

My only fear is the weather

 

[djcubby]

Scout.com: Iowa/ISU: Simulation Results

Apparently Bueker is gonna be our QB tomorrow... And we lose 16-14. Money gets a TD from Bueker and Smith returns an INT for a touchdown.

Seems likely!

They must have confused us with Iowa. Unlike the Hoks, our best QB is actually on the field and not on the bench.

 

[CycoCyclone]

-51 rushing yards on the game

 

[tman24]

-51 rushing yards on the game

All our running backs must get hurt and they have me come in from the stands to finish the game.

 

[superdorf]

All our running backs must get hurt and they have me come in from the stands to finish the game.

I think you are good for atleast one nice run tman.

 

[tman24]

Also we ran 50 offensive plays and Iowa ran 80 plays. we must have a lot of 3 and outs

 

[Clonebydesign]

Wow, the group that put that together is just attempting to make the hawk fans feel good about somthing. ISU only has 7 first downs, come on maybe after the first few drive at worst. Those stats are so BS that I dont even know why they bothered to publish that article. I understand that its HN but be real and not such a homer.

 

[The_Architect]

My only fear is the weather

A perfect day in the high 60s, mid 70's?

 

[The_Architect]

Wow, the group that put that together is just attempting to make the hawk fans feel good about somthing. ISU only has 7 first downs, come on maybe after the first few drive at worst. Those stats are so BS that I dont even know why they bothered to publish that article. I understand that its HN but be real and not such a homer.

You know that was done on a video game simulation right?

 

[BigSkyCy2]

Scout.com: Iowa/ISU: Simulation Results

Apparently Bueker is gonna be our QB tomorrow... And we lose 16-14. Money gets a TD from Bueker and Smith returns an INT for a touchdown.

Seems likely!

If we got to the point where Bueker is our QB, I would be happy only losing 16-14.

 

[Cyclonestate78]

A perfect day in the high 60s, mid 70's?

Weather isn't going to be a factor whether it rains or not.

1. Our field is one of the best in the nation and it won't turn into a swamp like the crappy old field at Kinnick.

2. We have an experienced RB in A-Rob. He has been very solid hanging on to the football and Arnaud is also good at protecting the ball when he is running with it.

3. Iowa is a run first offense. Rainy conditions would force them to run the ball more then they normally do which would allow ISU to really load up the box on them. With no SG to worry about it isn't a scary proposition there at all.

4. Our WR's... They handled the rain in Iowa City last year very well. I don't think it would affect them at all.

With those points made I think you can see that rain or shine ISU will have the same plan of attack. The weather isn't going to change it much if at all.

 

[Cyclonestate78]

You know that was done on a video game simulation right?

Maybe they forgot to turn the AI down for the hawks to 1%. Obviously this simulation is invalid at that point. :biglaugh:

 

[CrossCyed]

If we got to the point where Bueker is our QB, I would be happy only losing 16-14.

Bueker would wreak havoc.

 

[ribsnwhiskey]

Anyone on here care to do a sim and see what happens? I would if I had the newest and latest video game system, but alas I don't.