Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30
  1. #1
    Starter Wingback's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    758
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 39,942, Level: 61
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 408
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    3GenClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Windsor Heights
    Posts
    2,073
    Points
    39,942
    Level
    61
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 53
    Given: 57

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Delany said after introducing Nebraska on June 11 that the league's top priority will be "competitive fairness." Second is maintaining rivalries. Third is geography.
    Wouldn't that have been nice if the Big 12 would have been originally structured around a similar formula?



  3. #3
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 41,363, Level: 62
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 287
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    HandSanitizer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bondurant, IA
    Posts
    3,620
    Points
    41,363
    Level
    62
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 36
    Given: 0

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Iowa, PSU, Wisky and Nebraska is a pretty solid division. That is 4 teams that could win the division and represent it any year. I don't see Ill or Minny doing anything.

    That division will suck in basketball though. Which should help Iowa out since they will most likely get to play PSU and nebraska 2 times each year.



  4. #4
    All-Star
    Points: 24,006, Level: 47
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 544
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    dtclones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    1,630
    Points
    24,006
    Level
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    So if the number one priority is competitive fairness, do they plan on changing the divisions when there is a shift of power to other schools. I know you can argue that schools like OSU have had a long history of success so thats why they are considered a top tier school, but you never know what could happen down the road.



  5. #5
    Legend
    Points: 209,272, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 23.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    MNCyGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    10,540
    Points
    209,272
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 398
    Given: 261

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Personally, I liked that 3-team "pod" idea that someone proposed, but I don't know how you'd schedule a conference championship game around that.



  6. #6
    Pro
    Points: 39,942, Level: 61
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 408
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    3GenClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Windsor Heights
    Posts
    2,073
    Points
    39,942
    Level
    61
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 53
    Given: 57

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Quote Originally Posted by dtclones View Post
    So if the number one priority is competitive fairness, do they plan on changing the divisions when there is a shift of power to other schools. I know you can argue that schools like OSU have had a long history of success so thats why they are considered a top tier school, but you never know what could happen down the road.
    I'm not sure that Michigan and tOSU would be too keen on being in the same division. Using current records now makes sense, but Michigan is not a school that will be at the bottom for very long. Could you imagine the ratings for a Michigan - Ohio St Big 10 Championship game in a couple years?



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 95,448, Level: 96
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 1,602
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    8,947
    Points
    95,448
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 180
    Given: 446

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Quote Originally Posted by dtclones View Post
    So if the number one priority is competitive fairness, do they plan on changing the divisions when there is a shift of power to other schools. I know you can argue that schools like OSU have had a long history of success so thats why they are considered a top tier school, but you never know what could happen down the road.
    I'm with you.

    Nobody knows if Penn State will remain huge after Paterno's era (officially) ends. No guarantee U-M will stay at powerhouse level (although I figure that'll get corrected in "or else" fashion very soon).

    Nebraska has as much of that "long history of success" as PSU, and more than Illinois, so flipping that strength to the East seems shortsighted, considering Wisconsin and Iowa have had legitimate success for an extended period. (That paragraph was painful to write for a couple of reasons, but I can't pretend it isn't true).

    I suppose SI's plan figures NW-Illinois is a rivalry-split that's manageable, in exchange to keep all other rivalries, most geography, and balance. But geography doesn't change, and competitive balance might.


    Bass Lake Beacon: The best in local news satire

  8. #8
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 41,363, Level: 62
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 287
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    HandSanitizer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Bondurant, IA
    Posts
    3,620
    Points
    41,363
    Level
    62
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 36
    Given: 0

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Quote Originally Posted by 3GenClone View Post
    I'm not sure that Michigan and tOSU would be too keen on being in the same division. Using current records now makes sense, but Michigan is not a school that will be at the bottom for very long. Could you imagine the ratings for a Michigan - Ohio St Big 10 Championship game in a couple years?


    But if they were not in the same division then they could possibly have to play each other 2 times in 1 year. They are not going to like that either.



  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 62,308, Level: 77
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 942
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class
    WalkingCY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    5,031
    Points
    62,308
    Level
    77
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 85
    Given: 115

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Big Ten sucks.



  10. #10
    Addict
    Points: 66,059, Level: 79
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 391
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Rural's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    5,742
    Points
    66,059
    Level
    79
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 176
    Given: 111

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Ohio State-Michigan will play in a non-threatening division, you can take that to the bank.



  11. #11
    All-Star
    Points: 33,834, Level: 56
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 416
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    MookInLincoln's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Waverly, NE
    Posts
    1,235
    Points
    33,834
    Level
    56
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Thank god there was a husker fan to bring us all a link about the new bigten divisions!!!

    I don't think any of us have seen a single column or article about the subject since the bugeaters turned benedict arnold

    *puke*


    I'm on twitter @mookjnsn ... me, not her.

  12. #12
    All-Star
    Points: 20,372, Level: 43
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 378
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    1,074
    Points
    20,372
    Level
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3
    Given: 0

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Does anyone remember when Neb, KSU, and CU were the stalwarts of the conference? The conference was split geographically for good reason.

    What does the Big 10 do when the competitive scales tip and a future imbalance happens?

    The big difference I see between the two conferences is that Texas is the recruiting seed ground all Big 12 schools pull from. Imo, this is what lead to the balance of power shifting to Texas and OU.

    The Big 10 doesn't have an "in conference" state that every school pulls a majority of their recruits from. (Ohio is probably the closest, but doesn't compare to Texas)



  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 154,439, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    weR138's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,439
    Points
    154,439
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 72
    Given: 20

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    "Competetive fairness" is a silly requirement imo. A conference commissioner should consider his teams as equals, they share revenue don't they?

    I can understand rivalries having to stay intact but those are typically geographic anyway. If they split, the B10 should split east-west. The trio of NU, Iowa and Wisc. should be considered on par w/ tOSU, Mich and PSU by the B10.


    RIP Janice
    b. April 2012 d. April 2012
    9 posts
    May perpetual light shine upon him.

  14. #14
    Addict
    Points: 66,343, Level: 79
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 107
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Rogue52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    5,773
    Points
    66,343
    Level
    79
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 28
    Given: 1

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    *YAWN*



  15. #15
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 49,253, Level: 68
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 497
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Central Iowa
    Posts
    4,011
    Points
    49,253
    Level
    68
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14
    Given: 194

    Re: The Latest on Big 10 Divisions (WGN Chicago)

    Quote Originally Posted by 3GenClone View Post
    Wouldn't that have been nice if the Big 12 would have been originally structured around a similar formula?

    How easily we forget that in '94 when the texas 12 er....the Big XII was formed that one thing that was paramount was maintaining the Texas--Oklahoma rivalry!!!

    That Rivalry Plus Geographic Purity brought us a very unbalanced conference that was doomed from the start.


    Texas should have headed up the south ...With Oklahoma and Nebraska heading up the north and then you would have had "Competitive Balance" and also it would have preserved the best rivalry aka Nebbie v. Okie!!!!

    Boys it was doomed from the start and I think that the over and under on this conference is about five fricking years!!!!! (butt then again i could be wrong



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Fox Sports 1
  • Iowa State vs. Kansas State
  • September 6, 2014
  • 11:00 AM