Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26
  1. #1
    Rookie
    Points: 11,658, Level: 32
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 292
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Klubber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    445
    Points
    11,658
    Level
    32
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 6

    So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    They're leaving for greener pastures in the Pac Ten. Yet, the Pac Ten's average revenue distribution was $10M for the 2009-10 school year, while the Big XII was at $11.6M. And like the Big XII, the Pac Ten has unequal revenue sharing.

    Without a Pac 16, there's now probably no conference network on the table, and they've added another team (possibly two with Utah) to share conference revenue.

    Both CU and Utah won't bring massive revenue earnings to the table, and if CU starts conference play in 2011, they'll owe the Big XII $10M. So exactly how does CU think they're better off in the Pac Ten?


    Last edited by Klubber; 06-15-2010 at 02:22 AM.

  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 52,634, Level: 71
    Level completed: 6%, Points required for next Level: 1,416
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    AlleyAddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,609
    Points
    52,634
    Level
    71
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    they, like everyone else, probably figured everyone was bailing on the Big12. I bet they just tried to get out before everyone else did.



  3. #3
    Legend
    Points: 148,634, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    12,494
    Points
    148,634
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,104
    Given: 2,167

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by Klubber View Post
    They're leaving for greener pastures in the Pac Ten. Yet, the Pac Ten's average revenue distribution was $10M for the 2009-10 school year, while the Big XII was at $11.6M. And like the Big XII, the Pac Ten has unequal revenue sharing.

    Without a Pac 16, there's now probably no conference network on the table, and they've added another team (possibly two with Utah) to share conference revenue.

    Both CU and Utah won't bring massive revenue earnings to the table, and if CU starts conference play in 2011, they'll owe the Big XII $10M. So exactly how does CU think they're better off in the Pac Ten?
    A decent question. I'm not the person best-qualified to answer it.

    But I will anyway.

    Actually, my only guesses are:
    1. CU has wanted to join the Pac-10 for quite some time (from what I have read)
    2. CU may have feared implosion and thought it was safer to jump ... so it may not have been a short-term financial decision.


    Bass Lake Beacon: The best in local news satire

  4. #4
    Starter
    Points: 33,248, Level: 56
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 1,002
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    KneeGusto's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Squaw Creek
    Posts
    812
    Points
    33,248
    Level
    56
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 43
    Given: 46

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclones500 View Post
    Actually, my only guesses are:
    1. CU has wanted to join the Pac-10 for quite some time (from what I have read)
    2. CU may have feared implosion and thought it was safer to jump ... so it may not have been a short-term financial decision.
    Nail and hammer have successfully met.

    Well done.


    --------
    Pereant osores!
    --------

  5. #5
    All-Star
    Points: 25,390, Level: 48
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 160
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience Points
    ketchupnmustard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,047
    Points
    25,390
    Level
    48
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 34

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by Klubber View Post
    They're leaving for greener pastures in the Pac Ten. Yet, the Pac Ten's average revenue distribution was $10M for the 2009-10 school year, while the Big XII was at $11.6M. And like the Big XII, the Pac Ten has unequal revenue sharing.

    Without a Pac 16, there's now probably no conference network on the table, and they've added another team (possibly two with Utah) to share conference revenue.

    Both CU and Utah won't bring massive revenue earnings to the table, and if CU starts conference play in 2011, they'll owe the Big XII $10M. So exactly how does CU think they're better off in the Pac Ten?
    If CU could not come up with the money to get rid of Hawkins, how can they afford to to pay the Big 12 exit fee?


    "The bass, the rock,
    The mic, the treble,
    I like my coffee black,
    Just like my metal."

  6. #6
    Cyclone42
    Guest

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by AlleyAddict View Post
    they, like everyone else, probably figured everyone was bailing on the Big12. I bet they just tried to get out before everyone else did.
    Don't remember what happened only a week ago? The powers-that-be at Colorado thought it would be a race against Baylor to get into the Pac-10. News came out that powerful individuals within the Texas state legislature were going to push to have Baylor included in a Pac-10 expansion over Colorado. This likely caused Colorado decision-makers to panic and up their timetable.

    I suspect this might partially explain why the rest of the Big12 stayed together. These same powers in the Texas legislature likely switched from trying to get Baylor into the Pac-10 to trying to keep the Big12 intact when they realized that all hope was lost on getting Baylor into the Pac-10.



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 238,462, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 56.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    32,344
    Points
    238,462
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,899
    Given: 206

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    The amputation of Colorado actually helped save the Big XII.......or is it Big X?



  8. #8
    Asst. Regional Manager
    Points: 319,919, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    mj4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    21,528
    Points
    319,919
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,282
    Given: 1,993

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    So they're going to pay a buyout fee and then make less money in the Pac 10 than the new proposed TV deal of the Big 12.


    @RandomGeoFacts

  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 159,826, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    weR138's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    8,444
    Points
    159,826
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 618
    Given: 167

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclones500 View Post
    A decent question. I'm not the person best-qualified to answer it.

    But I will anyway.

    Actually, my only guesses are:
    1. CU has wanted to join the Pac-10 for quite some time (from what I have read)
    2. CU may have feared implosion and thought it was safer to jump ... so it may not have been a short-term financial decision.
    This. The vote to go to the Big XII was was something like 5-4 by their regents. I think their fans have always been too cool for (B12) school.


    RIP Janice
    b. April 2012 d. April 2012
    9 posts
    May perpetual light shine upon him.

  10. #10
    Burgermeister!
    Points: 379,741, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    TykeClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    24,446
    Points
    379,741
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,262
    Given: 1,966

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by Stormin View Post
    The amputation of Colorado actually helped save the Big XII.......or is it Big X?
    Given the naming algorithm of the Big 10, the new conference name is the Big VIII.


    Asteroids are nature's way of asking "How's that space program going?"

  11. #11
    Speechless
    Points: 449,291, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    24,693
    Points
    449,291
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 663
    Given: 225

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    People, there is no buyout fee. They'll get a portion of their TV revenue in the coming 2 seasons withheld.



  12. #12
    Addict
    Points: 63,989, Level: 78
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 861
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    CyinCo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Clive, IA
    Posts
    5,624
    Points
    63,989
    Level
    78
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 170
    Given: 4

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Hindsight is 20/20. CU didn't want Baylor to take their spot in the PAC10, so they jumped to beat out Baylor. They also thought the new PAC10 deal would be a huge $$ windfall. None of this is relevant any longer because the teams stayed. CU gambled and missed.


    ISU Grad 1997.
    ISU Fan for Life.

    Not in CO anymore but I'm not changing my name :)

  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 89,940, Level: 93
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 1,310
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,350
    Points
    89,940
    Level
    93
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 720
    Given: 0

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by IcSyU View Post
    People, there is no buyout fee. They'll get a portion of their TV revenue in the coming 2 seasons withheld.
    Okay fine, the question then is how can they afford their coaches with $4 million less coming in for the next couple of years?



  14. #14
    Speechless
    Points: 299,184, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Cydkar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    18,638
    Points
    299,184
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,464
    Given: 1,913

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    In 5 years they know they will be in the Pac-whatever. Do we know we'll be in the B12 in 5 years? 10 years?



  15. #15
    Speechless
    Points: 449,291, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    24,693
    Points
    449,291
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 663
    Given: 225

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by Clonehomer View Post
    Okay fine, the question then is how can they afford their coaches with $4 million less coming in for the next couple of years?
    The same way we could afford $50,000,000 in stadium improvements? You can always get more money...and you don't know that the Pac 10 won't step in and cover the revenue loss for them.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: ESPN
  • HOOPS: Iowa State vs. Texas
  • February 13, 2016
  • 07:30 PM