Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26
  1. #1
    Rookie
    Points: 10,659, Level: 31
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 591
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Klubber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    417
    Points
    10,659
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    They're leaving for greener pastures in the Pac Ten. Yet, the Pac Ten's average revenue distribution was $10M for the 2009-10 school year, while the Big XII was at $11.6M. And like the Big XII, the Pac Ten has unequal revenue sharing.

    Without a Pac 16, there's now probably no conference network on the table, and they've added another team (possibly two with Utah) to share conference revenue.

    Both CU and Utah won't bring massive revenue earnings to the table, and if CU starts conference play in 2011, they'll owe the Big XII $10M. So exactly how does CU think they're better off in the Pac Ten?


    Last edited by Klubber; 06-15-2010 at 01:22 AM.

  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 55,041, Level: 72
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 509
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    AlleyAddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,608
    Points
    55,041
    Level
    72
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    they, like everyone else, probably figured everyone was bailing on the Big12. I bet they just tried to get out before everyone else did.



  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 97,613, Level: 97
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 1,437
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    9,150
    Points
    97,613
    Level
    97
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 212
    Given: 507

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by Klubber View Post
    They're leaving for greener pastures in the Pac Ten. Yet, the Pac Ten's average revenue distribution was $10M for the 2009-10 school year, while the Big XII was at $11.6M. And like the Big XII, the Pac Ten has unequal revenue sharing.

    Without a Pac 16, there's now probably no conference network on the table, and they've added another team (possibly two with Utah) to share conference revenue.

    Both CU and Utah won't bring massive revenue earnings to the table, and if CU starts conference play in 2011, they'll owe the Big XII $10M. So exactly how does CU think they're better off in the Pac Ten?
    A decent question. I'm not the person best-qualified to answer it.

    But I will anyway.

    Actually, my only guesses are:
    1. CU has wanted to join the Pac-10 for quite some time (from what I have read)
    2. CU may have feared implosion and thought it was safer to jump ... so it may not have been a short-term financial decision.


    Bass Lake Beacon: The best in local news satire

  4. #4
    Starter
    Points: 31,239, Level: 54
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 711
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    KneeGusto's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Squaw Creek
    Posts
    768
    Points
    31,239
    Level
    54
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4
    Given: 4

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclones500 View Post
    Actually, my only guesses are:
    1. CU has wanted to join the Pac-10 for quite some time (from what I have read)
    2. CU may have feared implosion and thought it was safer to jump ... so it may not have been a short-term financial decision.
    Nail and hammer have successfully met.

    Well done.


    --------
    Pereant osores!
    --------

  5. #5
    All-Star
    Points: 23,940, Level: 47
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 610
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures10000 Experience Points
    ketchupnmustard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,018
    Points
    23,940
    Level
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 9
    Given: 16

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by Klubber View Post
    They're leaving for greener pastures in the Pac Ten. Yet, the Pac Ten's average revenue distribution was $10M for the 2009-10 school year, while the Big XII was at $11.6M. And like the Big XII, the Pac Ten has unequal revenue sharing.

    Without a Pac 16, there's now probably no conference network on the table, and they've added another team (possibly two with Utah) to share conference revenue.

    Both CU and Utah won't bring massive revenue earnings to the table, and if CU starts conference play in 2011, they'll owe the Big XII $10M. So exactly how does CU think they're better off in the Pac Ten?
    If CU could not come up with the money to get rid of Hawkins, how can they afford to to pay the Big 12 exit fee?


    "The bass, the rock,
    The mic, the treble,
    I like my coffee black,
    Just like my metal."

  6. #6
    Cyclone42
    Guest

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by AlleyAddict View Post
    they, like everyone else, probably figured everyone was bailing on the Big12. I bet they just tried to get out before everyone else did.
    Don't remember what happened only a week ago? The powers-that-be at Colorado thought it would be a race against Baylor to get into the Pac-10. News came out that powerful individuals within the Texas state legislature were going to push to have Baylor included in a Pac-10 expansion over Colorado. This likely caused Colorado decision-makers to panic and up their timetable.

    I suspect this might partially explain why the rest of the Big12 stayed together. These same powers in the Texas legislature likely switched from trying to get Baylor into the Pac-10 to trying to keep the Big12 intact when they realized that all hope was lost on getting Baylor into the Pac-10.



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 216,512, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    27,440
    Points
    216,512
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 506
    Given: 48

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    The amputation of Colorado actually helped save the Big XII.......or is it Big X?



  8. #8
    Asst. Regional Manager
    Points: 244,014, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 52.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    mj4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    17,390
    Points
    244,014
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 810
    Given: 786

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    So they're going to pay a buyout fee and then make less money in the Pac 10 than the new proposed TV deal of the Big 12.


    @RandomGeoFacts

  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 154,821, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    weR138's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,516
    Points
    154,821
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 112
    Given: 31

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclones500 View Post
    A decent question. I'm not the person best-qualified to answer it.

    But I will anyway.

    Actually, my only guesses are:
    1. CU has wanted to join the Pac-10 for quite some time (from what I have read)
    2. CU may have feared implosion and thought it was safer to jump ... so it may not have been a short-term financial decision.
    This. The vote to go to the Big XII was was something like 5-4 by their regents. I think their fans have always been too cool for (B12) school.


    RIP Janice
    b. April 2012 d. April 2012
    9 posts
    May perpetual light shine upon him.

  10. #10
    Burgermeister!
    Points: 360,023, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    TykeClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    23,025
    Points
    360,023
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 323
    Given: 578

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by Stormin View Post
    The amputation of Colorado actually helped save the Big XII.......or is it Big X?
    Given the naming algorithm of the Big 10, the new conference name is the Big VIII.


    Asteroids are nature's way of asking "How's that space program going?"

  11. #11
    Speechless
    Points: 442,293, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    23,928
    Points
    442,293
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 191
    Given: 25

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    People, there is no buyout fee. They'll get a portion of their TV revenue in the coming 2 seasons withheld.



  12. #12
    Addict
    Points: 66,133, Level: 79
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 317
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    CyinCo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Clive, IA
    Posts
    5,442
    Points
    66,133
    Level
    79
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 41
    Given: 0

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Hindsight is 20/20. CU didn't want Baylor to take their spot in the PAC10, so they jumped to beat out Baylor. They also thought the new PAC10 deal would be a huge $$ windfall. None of this is relevant any longer because the teams stayed. CU gambled and missed.


    ISU Grad 1997.
    ISU Fan for Life.

    Not in CO anymore but I'm not changing my name :)

  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 82,728, Level: 89
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 1,022
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,901
    Points
    82,728
    Level
    89
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 116
    Given: 0

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by IcSyU View Post
    People, there is no buyout fee. They'll get a portion of their TV revenue in the coming 2 seasons withheld.
    Okay fine, the question then is how can they afford their coaches with $4 million less coming in for the next couple of years?



  14. #14
    Speechless
    Points: 257,117, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Cydkar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    15,812
    Points
    257,117
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 662
    Given: 553

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    In 5 years they know they will be in the Pac-whatever. Do we know we'll be in the B12 in 5 years? 10 years?



  15. #15
    Speechless
    Points: 442,293, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    23,928
    Points
    442,293
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 191
    Given: 25

    Re: So let me get this straight with Colorado...

    Quote Originally Posted by Clonehomer View Post
    Okay fine, the question then is how can they afford their coaches with $4 million less coming in for the next couple of years?
    The same way we could afford $50,000,000 in stadium improvements? You can always get more money...and you don't know that the Pac 10 won't step in and cover the revenue loss for them.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 07:00 PM