Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Publisher
    Points: 929,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation First ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    ChrisMWilliams's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    17,766
    Points
    929,691
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,619
    Given: 582

    VLOG: The NCAA Tournament Expansion Debate

    Brent Blum stopped by to help me debate this topic in today's VLOG.

    Enjoy.

    VLOG: The NCAA Tournament expansion debate | Cyclone Fanatic



  2. #2
    All-Star
    Points: 18,238, Level: 41
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 712
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    kkise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ankeny, Iowa
    Posts
    1,083
    Points
    18,238
    Level
    41
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 229

    Re: VLOG: The NCAA Tournament Expansion Debate

    If you expand the NCAA tournament, you should get rid of the NIT and others. I don't want the NCAA becoming like the bowl games, where mediocre teams have a post-season.


    Keepers of the Faith -- Member

    Keepers of the Faith is an alliance for those who are excited, enthusiastic, and optimistic about the direction of our men's basketball program. We reject the notion that one bad loss can derail the incredible progress of the past three years. To join, put this in your signature.

  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 437,567, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    65,708
    Points
    437,567
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,578
    Given: 1,232

    Re: VLOG: The NCAA Tournament Expansion Debate

    Put everyone in it. Then we do not have to weep when we do not make the tournament.


    Let Prohm's Posse Ride: Georges, Georgios, 3sus, Hallice, Deonte, Abdel, Monte, Matt, and McKaT.

  4. #4
    Addict
    Points: 132,317, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ianoconnor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    8,056
    Points
    132,317
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 994
    Given: 2,185

    Re: VLOG: The NCAA Tournament Expansion Debate

    It's already big enough.



  5. #5
    Pro
    Points: 38,681, Level: 60
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    2,681
    Points
    38,681
    Level
    60
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 81
    Given: 17

    Re: VLOG: The NCAA Tournament Expansion Debate

    I think its just about right now. Teams that have good seasons (~20+ wins, several quality wins) can make the tourney.

    The major argument (other than $$$) is that the legit 8 bubble teams will get it. But, then there will just be 8 more bubble teams that want to get it. It never stops.



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 51,749, Level: 70
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 801
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Drive4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    972
    Posts
    5,541
    Points
    51,749
    Level
    70
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 15
    Given: 43

    Re: VLOG: The NCAA Tournament Expansion Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by kkise View Post
    If you expand the NCAA tournament, you should get rid of the NIT and others. I don't want the NCAA becoming like the bowl games, where mediocre teams have a post-season.
    Agreed about getting rid of the NIT. That's the only scenario that I'd welcome the expansion. No NIT, no CBI, no other crappy post-season tournaments. All or nothing with the NCAA tournament.

    I really see no use in expanding, though. A lot of years, the 8,9,10, and 11 seed at-large selections are pretty crappy teams as it is. If you're any worse than that, do you really deserve to play in the tourney? If you go 7-9 in the Big 12 you aren't very good and those are the type of teams who will get in with the expansion.



  7. #7
    All-Star
    Points: 30,582, Level: 53
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 268
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,462
    Points
    30,582
    Level
    53
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 49
    Given: 1

    Re: VLOG: The NCAA Tournament Expansion Debate

    [QUOTE=ChrisMWilliams;1421920]Brent Blum stopped by to help me debate this topic in today's VLOG.
    QUOTE]

    Very bad idea to expand. Expansion essentially means adding the NIT teams to the Big Dance. I don't want to see any teams with sub .500 conference records in the NCAAs now. By expanding to 96, you would see a bunch of them and that's ludicrous.

    Let's all hope that none of the TV networks say yes to this stupid NCAA suggestion, if it gets suggested.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.TV
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • September 5, 2015
  • 07:00 PM