stats for the players
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Starter
    Points: 20,484, Level: 43
    Level completed: 71%, Points required for next Level: 266
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran10000 Experience Points
    baller1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    807
    Points
    20,484
    Level
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14
    Given: 3

    stats for the players

    what is your starting five and what are your predictions for each player...

    Garrett- 9 ppg 6 assts
    Staiger- 9 ppg
    Gilstrap- 16 ppg 7 reb
    Brackins- 20 ppg 11 reb
    Hamilton- 5 ppg 5 reb

    Colvin- 3 ppg 3 assts
    Buckley- 3 ppg 1 assts
    Christopherson- 5 ppg
    Dendy- 5 ppg 5 rebs
    Vander beken- 5 ppg
    Boozer 2 ppg



  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 42,375, Level: 63
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 575
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience PointsYour first Group

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    SW Iowa
    Posts
    2,248
    Points
    42,375
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 70
    Given: 56

    Re: stats for the players

    what is your starting five and what are your predictions for each player...

    Garrett- 9 ppg 6 assts
    Staiger- 9 ppg
    Gilstrap- 16 ppg 7 reb
    Brackins- 20 ppg 11 reb
    Hamilton- 5 ppg 5 reb

    Colvin- 3 ppg 3 assts
    Buckley- 3 ppg 1 assts
    Christopherson- 5 ppg
    Dendy- 5 ppg 5 rebs
    Vander beken- 5 ppg
    Boozer 2 ppg
    I agree with your starting five except your stats add up to 82 points. I'm pretty sure we probably won't average 82 points per game over the course of a season. With the addition of Gilstrap, Brackins probably won't score quite as much this year because he won't have to.



  3. #3
    All-Star
    Points: 22,705, Level: 46
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 845
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    jj-cyclones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    1,885
    Points
    22,705
    Level
    46
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 55
    Given: 41

    Re: stats for the players

    82 points per game woud not be bad...

    Looking at your predictions, it looks like a total team effort. But if we play at a much faster pace this year then our d will pry give up around that many points as well.

    I just hope the 50 points per game is done with and we can consistently score around 80 points a game... (that would be great)



  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 283,517, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    16,775
    Points
    283,517
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 309
    Given: 47

    Re: stats for the players

    I'm thinking that Craig's PPG is going to come down this year since he will have more help around him.



  5. #5
    Speechless
    Points: 343,407, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Grimes, IA
    Posts
    32,600
    Points
    343,407
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 565
    Given: 356

    Re: stats for the players

    82ppg? Um, no.



  6. #6
    Starter
    Points: 20,484, Level: 43
    Level completed: 71%, Points required for next Level: 266
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran10000 Experience Points
    baller1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    807
    Points
    20,484
    Level
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14
    Given: 3

    Re: stats for the players

    you could just make your own predictions instead of criticizing mine. obniously we probably won't average 82 i was just putting numbers next to names.



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 261,186, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    BryceC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    16,867
    Points
    261,186
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 240
    Given: 0

    Re: stats for the players

    Garrett- 9 ppg 6 assts
    Christopherson- 6 ppg
    Gilstrap- 12 ppg 7 reb
    Brackins- 15 ppg 10 reb
    Hamilton- 6 ppg 5 reb

    Colvin- 3 ppg 3 assts
    Buckley- 3 ppg 1 assts
    Staiger- 6 ppg
    Dendy- 5 ppg 5 rebs
    Vander beken- 5 ppg
    Boozer 2 ppg




  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 350,872, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    isucyfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    19,874
    Points
    350,872
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 105
    Given: 2

    Re: stats for the players

    Quote Originally Posted by BryceC View Post
    Garrett- 9 ppg 6 assts
    Christopherson- 6 ppg
    Gilstrap- 12 ppg 7 reb
    Brackins- 15 ppg 10 reb
    Hamilton- 6 ppg 5 reb

    Colvin- 3 ppg 3 assts
    Buckley- 3 ppg 1 assts
    Staiger- 6 ppg
    Dendy- 5 ppg 5 rebs
    Vander beken- 5 ppg
    Boozer 2 ppg
    I think this is pretty close.

    I might put Christopherson and Dendy a little lower, and Gilstrap and Brackins a little higher. But we're talking just a couple of points, so I'm in line with this.



  9. #9
    All-Star
    Points: 34,659, Level: 57
    Level completed: 35%, Points required for next Level: 791
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,985
    Points
    34,659
    Level
    57
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 1

    Re: stats for the players

    I don't think Brackins' numbers will drop off as much as people think despite the talent being upgraded around him...if anything, Gilstrap will make it so teams can't just key on Brackins.

    I doubt Craig will have as many games where he is at 42 and 14, or 38 and 16...but I think he'll be more consistent than he was last year where he had some games where he just disappeared. (remember...Fizer's numbers went up when we added Tinsley and Horton)

    I also doubt we'll get as many ppg off of the bench as people are predicting despite our depth...although I do believe any one of the 4 or 5 people off of our bench have a chance at dropping ten or so points on any given night.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Mediacom 22
  • HOOPS: Iowa State vs. Drake
  • December 20, 2014
  • 04:00 PM