Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Starter
    Points: 21,359, Level: 44
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 291
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran10000 Experience Points
    baller1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    855
    Points
    21,359
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 49
    Given: 12

    stats for the players

    what is your starting five and what are your predictions for each player...

    Garrett- 9 ppg 6 assts
    Staiger- 9 ppg
    Gilstrap- 16 ppg 7 reb
    Brackins- 20 ppg 11 reb
    Hamilton- 5 ppg 5 reb

    Colvin- 3 ppg 3 assts
    Buckley- 3 ppg 1 assts
    Christopherson- 5 ppg
    Dendy- 5 ppg 5 rebs
    Vander beken- 5 ppg
    Boozer 2 ppg



  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 43,407, Level: 64
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 843
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience PointsYour first Group

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    SW Iowa
    Posts
    2,281
    Points
    43,407
    Level
    64
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 84
    Given: 74

    Re: stats for the players

    what is your starting five and what are your predictions for each player...

    Garrett- 9 ppg 6 assts
    Staiger- 9 ppg
    Gilstrap- 16 ppg 7 reb
    Brackins- 20 ppg 11 reb
    Hamilton- 5 ppg 5 reb

    Colvin- 3 ppg 3 assts
    Buckley- 3 ppg 1 assts
    Christopherson- 5 ppg
    Dendy- 5 ppg 5 rebs
    Vander beken- 5 ppg
    Boozer 2 ppg
    I agree with your starting five except your stats add up to 82 points. I'm pretty sure we probably won't average 82 points per game over the course of a season. With the addition of Gilstrap, Brackins probably won't score quite as much this year because he won't have to.



  3. #3
    Pro
    Points: 27,948, Level: 51
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 702
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    jj-cyclones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,051
    Points
    27,948
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 118
    Given: 75

    Re: stats for the players

    82 points per game woud not be bad...

    Looking at your predictions, it looks like a total team effort. But if we play at a much faster pace this year then our d will pry give up around that many points as well.

    I just hope the 50 points per game is done with and we can consistently score around 80 points a game... (that would be great)



  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 288,371, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    17,065
    Points
    288,371
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 517
    Given: 72

    Re: stats for the players

    I'm thinking that Craig's PPG is going to come down this year since he will have more help around him.



  5. #5
    Speechless
    Points: 353,585, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    33,325
    Points
    353,585
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,088
    Given: 626

    Re: stats for the players

    82ppg? Um, no.



  6. #6
    Starter
    Points: 21,359, Level: 44
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 291
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran10000 Experience Points
    baller1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    855
    Points
    21,359
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 49
    Given: 12

    Re: stats for the players

    you could just make your own predictions instead of criticizing mine. obniously we probably won't average 82 i was just putting numbers next to names.



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 265,898, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsCreated Album pictures
    BryceC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    17,218
    Points
    265,898
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 458
    Given: 0

    Re: stats for the players

    Garrett- 9 ppg 6 assts
    Christopherson- 6 ppg
    Gilstrap- 12 ppg 7 reb
    Brackins- 15 ppg 10 reb
    Hamilton- 6 ppg 5 reb

    Colvin- 3 ppg 3 assts
    Buckley- 3 ppg 1 assts
    Staiger- 6 ppg
    Dendy- 5 ppg 5 rebs
    Vander beken- 5 ppg
    Boozer 2 ppg




  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 351,828, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    isucyfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    19,873
    Points
    351,828
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 122
    Given: 6

    Re: stats for the players

    Quote Originally Posted by BryceC View Post
    Garrett- 9 ppg 6 assts
    Christopherson- 6 ppg
    Gilstrap- 12 ppg 7 reb
    Brackins- 15 ppg 10 reb
    Hamilton- 6 ppg 5 reb

    Colvin- 3 ppg 3 assts
    Buckley- 3 ppg 1 assts
    Staiger- 6 ppg
    Dendy- 5 ppg 5 rebs
    Vander beken- 5 ppg
    Boozer 2 ppg
    I think this is pretty close.

    I might put Christopherson and Dendy a little lower, and Gilstrap and Brackins a little higher. But we're talking just a couple of points, so I'm in line with this.



  9. #9
    Pro
    Points: 44,005, Level: 64
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 245
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,367
    Points
    44,005
    Level
    64
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 208
    Given: 114

    Re: stats for the players

    I don't think Brackins' numbers will drop off as much as people think despite the talent being upgraded around him...if anything, Gilstrap will make it so teams can't just key on Brackins.

    I doubt Craig will have as many games where he is at 42 and 14, or 38 and 16...but I think he'll be more consistent than he was last year where he had some games where he just disappeared. (remember...Fizer's numbers went up when we added Tinsley and Horton)

    I also doubt we'll get as many ppg off of the bench as people are predicting despite our depth...although I do believe any one of the 4 or 5 people off of our bench have a chance at dropping ten or so points on any given night.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.TV
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • September 5, 2015
  • 07:00 PM