Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 62
  1. #1
    Walk On Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    147
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Why not go for 2?

    Why not go for 2? If you gto for 2 the game rests entirely in YOUR hands! Its YOUR offense! our defense was a joke against K-State! leave it up to the Offense! Let the chips fall wear they may! Besides, ISU's kicking woes are NOTORIOUS the last 10 years or better!



  2. #2
    Legend
    Points: 402,129, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    cyclonedave25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14,289
    Points
    402,129
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 153
    Given: 61

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    He was 45 of 45 going into that blocked kick.
    If we went for 2 and failed, could you imagine the meltdown????
    This is a mute topic and will get nowhere.


    When Prepared, Fear No One.

  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 227,057, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 23.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience PointsCreated Album pictures
    Clones21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    17,558
    Points
    227,057
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    Should of went for the win


    "Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."

  4. #4
    Starter
    Points: 19,209, Level: 42
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 641
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran10000 Experience Points
    LeaningCy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    866
    Points
    19,209
    Level
    42
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 4

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    Because we would not have converted and you would have had to post a thread titled "Why not gor for 1?"


    Winning cures all.

  5. #5
    Speechless
    Points: 447,545, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    brianhos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Trenchtown
    Posts
    39,325
    Points
    447,545
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 46
    Given: 10

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    Because 99/100 you make that PAT and ISU had the momentum.


    They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Benjamin Franklin 1775

  6. #6
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 82,739, Level: 89
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 1,011
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    CRcyclone6's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Rapids
    Posts
    4,921
    Points
    82,739
    Level
    89
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 46
    Given: 237

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    Mahoney was 45-45 pats going into the game. no reason to go for 2.


    Are you a member?

  7. #7
    Pro
    Points: 56,895, Level: 73
    Level completed: 90%, Points required for next Level: 155
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    kilgore_trout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    2,043
    Points
    56,895
    Level
    73
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 29
    Given: 228

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    why is taking your chances at OT better than taking your chances at a 2 point conversion?


    I was a victim of a series of accidents, as are we all.

  8. #8
    Chile Mac is Back!
    Points: 298,306, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    LindenCy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    22,630
    Points
    298,306
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 131
    Given: 334

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    I don't think you should ever go for 2 at the end unless you are a major underdog and think it is your best shot. It either ends up great or horribly wrong.



  9. #9
    Legend
    Points: 310,022, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    CyCrazy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    In a Bunker
    Posts
    14,346
    Points
    310,022
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 25
    Given: 8

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    If rhoads would have gone for 2 his head would have needed to be examined..... He made the smart call



  10. #10
    Addict
    Points: 83,455, Level: 89
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 295
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hudson, Iowa
    Posts
    8,008
    Points
    83,455
    Level
    89
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 14

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    I think the right decision was made.



  11. #11
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 45,429, Level: 65
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 121
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Plano, TX
    Posts
    3,791
    Points
    45,429
    Level
    65
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 1

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    Going for 2 you only get 1 play to score, if you go to OT barring any major setbacks you get more chances to score, though I am sure you knew that.....Easy call, not one that should be debated in a conference game or unless like the poster above said, you are a big underdog.


    "It is the nature of man to rise to greatness if greatness is expected of him."
    John Steinbeck

    XBOXLive: MNclone
    PS3: JHudd23
    Twitter: JasonAH

  12. #12
    Pro
    Points: 72,629, Level: 83
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 521
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    TheCaptain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    3,092
    Points
    72,629
    Level
    83
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 2

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    I made a sarcastic post in the Game thread at the time saying "go for 2".

    The right decision was made.
    We should be discussing OT strategies...not this.


    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Excessive intake of alcohol, we all know, kills brain cells, but naturally it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this way regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. That's why you always feel smarter after a few beers.

  13. #13
    Speechless
    Points: 227,057, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 23.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience PointsCreated Album pictures
    Clones21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    17,558
    Points
    227,057
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCaptain View Post
    I made a sarcastic post in the Game thread at the time saying "go for 2".

    The right decision was made.
    We should be discussing OT strategies...not this.
    You werent being sarcastic


    "Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."

  14. #14
    All-Star
    Points: 20,560, Level: 43
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 190
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Cyclone90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Johnston, IA
    Posts
    1,383
    Points
    20,560
    Level
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 6

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    The 2007 NCAA average for two point conversions was .421. Is Iowa State's offense in it's current state, and without A-Rob, able to beat that percentage? Probably not. I'd rather go into OT with a far superior kicker. Our chance of winning would be better than .421.




  15. #15
    All-Star
    Points: 23,653, Level: 47
    Level completed: 11%, Points required for next Level: 897
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Quad Cities
    Posts
    1,377
    Points
    23,653
    Level
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 17

    Re: Why not gor for 2?

    First off, the defense did not play bad. They had a couple of short fields and had problems at the beginning adjusting to a new QB. Second, you are not the coach, thank GOD.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 06:00 PM