Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 95,721, Level: 96
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 1,329
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,185
    Points
    95,721
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 0

    Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    I looked at the rivals rankings for the past two years (non premium) and Iowa State is now ranked 60th nationally with 20 recruits, compared to 63rd last year with 30 recruits. With a short recruiting season, how can this be?



  2. #2
    Addict
    Points: 51,035, Level: 69
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 115
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Drive4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    972
    Posts
    5,540
    Points
    51,035
    Level
    69
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 42

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    We are blessed



  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 277,865, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    16,533
    Points
    277,865
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 167
    Given: 15

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    I have two words: GENE CHIZIK



  4. #4
    Legend
    Points: 267,069, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    chuckd4735's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny, Iowa
    Posts
    14,201
    Points
    267,069
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 586
    Given: 147

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    We acctually have the same number of points this year as we did last year, its just that overall it ranks higher this year!



  5. #5
    All-Star
    Points: 25,304, Level: 48
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 246
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    BenEClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Lincoln, Ne
    Posts
    1,828
    Points
    25,304
    Level
    48
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4
    Given: 4

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    If I read it right, there are three commits who are not yet rated so they are factored in as Zero Stars. Add 3-5 more commits, adjust the star ratings and the class will be more respectable.


    “We’ve got a pretty good football conference, and we’ve got a pretty good conference overall. We’re still walking around with our heads held high and our chest out, about that.” Paul Rhoads

  6. #6
    Pro
    Points: 42,278, Level: 63
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 672
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    TheHelgo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,760
    Points
    42,278
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    Quote Originally Posted by BenEClone View Post
    If I read it right, there are three commits who are not yet rated so they are factored in as Zero Stars. Add 3-5 more commits, adjust the star ratings and the class will be more respectable.
    Maybe they truly are 0 stars....



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 94,915, Level: 95
    Level completed: 93%, Points required for next Level: 135
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    CYdTracked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    8,695
    Points
    94,915
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7
    Given: 7

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    I never buy into star ratings and recruiting ranks for our classes. We've uncovered some real gems in the past that were low star ratings and take Arnaud for instance. He was supposedly a 5 star before he signed with ISU then dropped to a 3 star. Had he signed with a big name school he wouldn't have dropped to a 3 star most likely.

    It's ISU, it's just assumed if you sign with us you aren't that good and if you sign with someone like Texas then you are good basically. Look at how many guys we have sent to the NFL that I bet you that were a 3 star recruit at best if not lower. Jordan Carstens probably didn't even get a star rating since he was a walk-on and he's been All-Big 12 and a starter in the NFL at times.

    It's all about signing guys that you can develop and can play well in your system.



  8. #8
    Pro
    Points: 57,646, Level: 74
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 904
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    2,319
    Points
    57,646
    Level
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 57
    Given: 0

    I don't buy the star conspiracy with us. But what

    I DO buy is there is a very postive coorelation between having a highly rated recruiting class and results on the field. Obviously there will be exceptions, but if you look at the consistently higher rated schools, they are consistently at the tops of their conferences and playing for BCS bowls. I don't know what would be worse - having highly rated recruiting classes we can trumpet and winning 1 conference game on a bad call, or having a team full of nobodys and never-will-bes winning 1 conference game on a bad call...



  9. #9
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 51,223, Level: 70
    Level completed: 6%, Points required for next Level: 1,327
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    CyclonesRule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines
    Posts
    3,745
    Points
    51,223
    Level
    70
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 10

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    This ranking according to them is still 11th in the Big XII.



  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 47,130, Level: 67
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 1,220
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Burnsville, MN
    Posts
    2,932
    Points
    47,130
    Level
    67
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 68
    Given: 15

    Re: I don't buy the star conspiracy with us. But what

    Quote Originally Posted by SpokaneCY View Post
    I DO buy is there is a very postive coorelation between having a highly rated recruiting class and results on the field. Obviously there will be exceptions, but if you look at the consistently higher rated schools, they are consistently at the tops of their conferences and playing for BCS bowls. I don't know what would be worse - having highly rated recruiting classes we can trumpet and winning 1 conference game on a bad call, or having a team full of nobodys and never-will-bes winning 1 conference game on a bad call...
    Everyone knows that any given player will see some degree of success if he plays at a Texas, USC, or other Powerhouse. Therefore if someone is recruited and signed by such a school, it is safe to put a nice high rating on that particular recruit. However, if someone commits to a school like Iowa State, they know there there will likely be less of a supporting cast, so the safe thing to do is to lower the rating of that player.
    Could be wrong here, but that is the way I see it. We will never have highly rated recruiting classes until we have consistant performers on the field.



  11. #11
    Prospect Achievements:
    Veteran1000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    Hopefully GC turns out to be a better coach than Zook at IL.

    Look at what Zook is pulling in for that school (and what he pulled in at Florida), yet it's very debatable that he's a good coach of the talent he pulls in. Look what Meyer was able to do with Zook's players.

    It's one thing to pull in the high ranking star players, it's another to coach them.



  12. #12
    All-Star
    Points: 19,993, Level: 43
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 757
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    flander1649's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    1,582
    Points
    19,993
    Level
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 8

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    Now ISU is #58 in the country with an average of 2.4 if they give Weir a 2 star ranking that will move the average up to 2.5.



  13. #13
    All-Star
    Points: 36,419, Level: 58
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 231
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    clonomaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,989
    Points
    36,419
    Level
    58
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    Quote Originally Posted by CyclonesRule View Post
    This ranking according to them is still 11th in the Big XII.

    At least we are not 12th. I think we were 11th last year too.

    Call me crazy but I am expecting to win at least 4 games this year. Anything less than 4 wins will be horrible.



  14. #14
    All-Star
    Points: 36,419, Level: 58
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 231
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    clonomaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    St Louis, MO
    Posts
    1,989
    Points
    36,419
    Level
    58
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    Quote Originally Posted by zooropa_ncr View Post
    Hopefully GC turns out to be a better coach than Zook at IL.

    Look at what Zook is pulling in for that school (and what he pulled in at Florida), yet it's very debatable that he's a good coach of the talent he pulls in. Look what Meyer was able to do with Zook's players.

    It's one thing to pull in the high ranking star players, it's another to coach them.

    Come on Man, Zook???? You are comparing Chizik to Zook??

    I hope you mean strictly recruiting-wise.



  15. #15
    Speechless
    Points: 117,937, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUAlum2002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Urbandale
    Posts
    15,488
    Points
    117,937
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 38
    Given: 58

    Re: Rivals: ISU 60th 2007: 63rd 2006..how can this be?

    Quote Originally Posted by clonomaniac View Post
    Come on Man, Zook???? You are comparing Chizik to Zook??

    I hope you mean strictly recruiting-wise.
    Yeah, lets wait to see Chizik coach some games before we compare his coaching abilities to the Zooker.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 11:00 AM