Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 63
  1. #1
    Addict
    Points: 143,713, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation First ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CrossCyed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    9,386
    Points
    143,713
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 0

    Do you like new roster numbers?

    0 Antwon Oliver
    1 Dominique Buckley
    2 Chris Colvin
    3 Marquis Gilstrap
    4 Charles Boozer
    5 Lucca Staiger
    10 Diante Garrett
    11 Scott Christopherson
    12 Alex Dorr
    21 Craig Brackins
    22 Laron Dendy
    23 Jamie Vanderbeken
    34 LA Pomlee
    41 Justin Hamilton



  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 870,318, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    CycloneErik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jamerica
    Posts
    56,546
    Points
    870,318
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,205
    Given: 1,828

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Sure. No reason not to.


    Since we are an elite team now, let's go get that One Cyclone Moment.
    Make this one for the ages!




    http://rememberingdoria.wordpress.com/

  3. #3
    Walk On
    Points: 8,931, Level: 28
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 419
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    203
    Points
    8,931
    Level
    28
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    I wonder what kind of deal Oliver made to get Boozer's zero



  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 189,043, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    kingcy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Menlo, Iowa
    Posts
    17,657
    Points
    189,043
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 212
    Given: 142

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Why were they changed? Why dont they do the #40 thing anymore? Dorr would be perfect for that since he is from the same area as Chris Street was.


    The gap in our economy is between what we have and what we think we ought to have--and that is a moral problem, not an economic one. - Paul Heyne

  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 87,119, Level: 91
    Level completed: 83%, Points required for next Level: 331
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Erik4Cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    7,179
    Points
    87,119
    Level
    91
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 247
    Given: 169

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    I like the names better, but still not as much as the name on the front of the jersey.


    ISU license plates, just $50 at: http://www.iamvd.com/ovs/plates/index.htm
    "I am so proud to be your football coach!" - Paul Rhoads

    HOI-BALL!!!

  6. #6
    Pro
    Points: 119,141, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    balken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,643
    Points
    119,141
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4
    Given: 0

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Personally, I think they should not be limited by integers. How about 4.54 as your number? Or maybe use the pi symbol. How about a differential equation as your number. Then the ref would have to solve the equation before going to the scorer's table after a foul.



  7. #7
    Pro
    Points: 40,974, Level: 62
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 676
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    San Francisco Cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,001
    Points
    40,974
    Level
    62
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Quote Originally Posted by CrossCyed View Post
    0 Antwon Oliver
    1 Dominique Buckley
    2 Chris Colvin
    3 Marquis Gilstrap
    4 Charles Boozer
    5 Lucca Staiger
    10 Diante Garrett
    11 Scott Christopherson
    12 Alex Dorr
    21 Craig Brackins
    22 Laron Dendy
    23 Jamie Vanderbeken
    34 LA Pomlee
    41 Justin Hamilton
    I dislike them. Who can I write a letter of complaint to?



  8. #8
    Addict
    Points: 166,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    jaretac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Frigidaire
    Posts
    7,636
    Points
    166,691
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Quote Originally Posted by CrossCyed View Post
    0 Antwon Oliver
    1 Dominique Buckley
    2 Chris Colvin
    3 Marquis Gilstrap
    4 Charles Boozer
    5 Lucca Staiger
    10 Diante Garrett
    11 Scott Christopherson
    12 Alex Dorr
    21 Craig Brackins
    22 Laron Dendy
    23 Jamie Vanderbeken
    34 LA Pomlee
    41 Justin Hamilton
    I don't like them, I think we should use the old roman numerals

    I Dominique Buckley
    II Chris Colvin
    III Marquis Gilstrap
    IV Charles Boozer
    V Lucca Staiger
    X Diante Garrett
    XI Scott Christopherson
    XII Alex Dorr
    XXI Craig Brackins
    XXII Laron Dendy
    XXIII Jamie Vanderbeken
    XXXIV LA Pomlee
    XLI Justin Hamilton

    Much classier



  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 127,945, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    tim_redd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    7,437
    Points
    127,945
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 113
    Given: 65

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Quote Originally Posted by jaretac View Post
    I don't like them, I think we should use the old roman numerals

    I Dominique Buckley
    II Chris Colvin
    III Marquis Gilstrap
    IV Charles Boozer
    V Lucca Staiger
    X Diante Garrett
    XI Scott Christopherson
    XII Alex Dorr
    XXI Craig Brackins
    XXII Laron Dendy
    XXIII Jamie Vanderbeken
    XXXIV LA Pomlee
    XLI Justin Hamilton

    Much classier
    That would be so awesome...



  10. #10
    Legend
    Points: 146,976, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    cybsball20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    12,718
    Points
    146,976
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 181
    Given: 34

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Somebody should be wearing #40. Other than that, I don't get it...



    Follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/MarkHanrahan20

    Check out my blog
    http://markhanrahan.com

    and tune into "Extra Innings" Thursdays at 6pm on 1460kxno

  11. #11
    Recruit
    Points: 6,088, Level: 23
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 462
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    98
    Points
    6,088
    Level
    23
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Maybe it is just me but I never got why a cyclone player would be wereing 40. Not that I don't see the tragedy in the loss of a young life but I jus tnever thought it necessary on our team.



  12. #12
    Addict
    Points: 131,103, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    theshadow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    6,688
    Points
    131,103
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 104
    Given: 0

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Quote Originally Posted by kingcy View Post
    Why dont they do the #40 thing anymore?
    Because there's no point to it. There hasn't been a real meaning attached since about 1999.



  13. #13
    Starter
    Points: 17,383, Level: 40
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 667
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    715
    Points
    17,383
    Level
    40
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Quote Originally Posted by cybsball20 View Post
    Somebody should be wearing #40. Other than that, I don't get it...
    They're saving that for Barnes next year...



  14. #14
    Speechless
    Points: 737,152, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 82.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Cyclonepride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    A pineapple under the sea
    Posts
    48,074
    Points
    737,152
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,601
    Given: 760

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    I hate it. There's no number 7.

    7 is my favorite number.



  15. #15
    Walk On ZCyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    204
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Do you like new roster numbers?

    Quote Originally Posted by balken View Post
    Personally, I think they should not be limited by integers. How about 4.54 as your number? Or maybe use the pi symbol. How about a differential equation as your number. Then the ref would have to solve the equation before going to the scorer's table after a foul.
    Why limit it to mere real numbers? Throw a little "i' in there, and you can have imaginary players. Who knows, maybe we could sneak a few more onto the floor to deal with the jayhawks this year...



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: FS1
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 11:00 AM